Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/php-tmp/upload) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 348

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361
achat en ligne trileptal solution acheter du stromectol en ligne vente aricept medication online la simvastatine zocor générique acheter dramamine pas cher sans ordonnance allegra plus mucinex formulaire remboursement plavix belgique acheter skelaxin en ligne forum achat dutas pharmacie achat lioresal en ligne avis diltiazem hcl er 240 mg prednisolone 20mg biogaran effets secondaires prednisolone effets secondaires chez le chien prednisolone goutte ophtalmique version générique pour advair arimidex anastrozole canada achat clomid 50mg forum achat en ligne haldol quebec warez generique erexor pas cher diltiazem pas cher en pharmacie achat en ligne crestor quebec streaming cialis 15 mg provera pas cher paris nice acheter clonidine générique en ligne femme et viagra où puis-je acheter xenical en australie acheter sarafem en ligne comprimé achat urispas livraison rapide a domicile acheter plavix effets secondaires vente tadacip sans ordonnance acheter risperdal consta effets secondaires achat fertomid pharmacie belgique acheter mestinon générique france amitriptyline et millepertuis vente feldene piroxicam injectable vente de crestor pas cher en france appareil photo batterie lithium pas cher qu'est-ce que l'amitriptyline 50 mg utilisé pour acheter isoptin 100mg pfizer achat en ligne sinequanone soldes viagra trois gratuit pilules viagra avis médical vente abilify sans ordonnance france achat en ligne cozaar 50 mg provera 5mg wikipédia keppra pas cher marques automobiles erythromycin 500 mg doziranje acheter cleocin en ligne achat maxalt lyoca vente de suprax pas cher en france legislation vente libre albenza suisse acheter mircette 100mg alli vente en ligne belgique acheter proscar en ligne jeux d'action reglan pas cher aldactone homme acheter à bas prix viagra en usa lozol pas cher france canada resultat trandate tachycardie 50 mg de prednisone pendant 2 jours comment acheter colospa sans ordonnance acheter diakof en france livraison 48h chrono lamisil et lamisilate peut on acheter du valtrex en pharmacie vente caverta 100 mg tablets femcare pas cher marques automobiles acheter elavil en france livraison rapide acheter du indinavir pas cher forum achat lopressor générique en belgique lioresal suisse ovaires polykystiques traitement clomid achat en ligne naltrexone revia 50mg cozaar goutte strattera pas chere cuisine acheter zoloft 100mg vente lamisilate avapro pas cher maroc torrent zyrtec pas cher voyages augmentin dents jaunes cytotec principe actif achat trandate prednisolone 20mg effet secondaire ou trouver du levitra pas cher forum achat torsemide en ligne achat calandre mini cooper nid d'abeille r560 achat anacin canada achat evista pas cher paris gain de poids de pilules de periactin vente zyprexa velotab 5 mg tegretol pas cher maroczik viagra supermarché vente hytrin france alli orlistat 60 mg en colombie coût de l'accutane avec de l'hymne achat zyrtec pas cher effet acheter antivert livraison 48h chrono 2 vente micardis france detrol pas cher avion pas la prise de deux 25 mg viagra achat en ligne wellbutrin acheter cardura sans ordonnance en belgique ou acheter saw palmetto sans ordonnance à bruxelles flagyl et sinusite achat en ligne finpecia quebec team femme prend viagra acheter cytotec en france livraison rapide combien de mg de surdosage bupropion sur paxil pas cher en ligne irantv achat tinidazole en belgique arava doctissimo pas cher cialis en ligne pharmacie canadienne acide folique et methotrexate effets du sevrage du cymbalta risperdal 1 mgr combien de temps dur le viagra achat ponstel canada risperdal procès achat crestor pas cher france vente de isoptin en pharmacie vente menosan vogel comment maigrir avec abilify acheter ophthacare sans ordonnance en belgique combien de temps propranolol 60 mg en dernier singulair et sommeil achat lopressor 100mg roxithromycin pas cheres tfc paroxetine et sueurs nocturnes lioresal 10 mg preis prometrium effets secondaires fiv glycomet pas cher marques voitures combien lisinopril 10 mg coût bula do medicamento orlistat 120mg achat en ligne cytotec stérilet zoloft prise le matin ou le soir risperdal nom generique comprar cialis 5mg no brasil albendazole pas cher livraison rapide albendazole cytotec et expulsion de l'oeuf acheter ayurslim en ligne livraison 24h achat atrovent en france livraison rapide advair costco vente levlen difference risperdal et fievre achat en ligne tamoxifene 20mg existe-il des versions génériques de viagra vente vermox des coupons pour le générique de lexapro augmentin prix inj effexor et absence de regles achat levitra 100mg pfizer desyrel pas cher indemnisation générique bystolic prix vrai erexin-v pas cher acheter yasmin en ligne canada atrovent vidal effet secondaire achat zaditor generique en france dépo provera enceinte acheter ethionamide en france achat en ligne lopressor pas cher acheter indocin générique en france metformin kyste ovarien acheter topamax en ligne livraison 24h achat en ligne de v-gel effexor+exposition au soleil achat eulexin en france et sans ordonnance kesan clomid 100mg achat en ligne fluoxetine prozac achat roxithromycin pharmacie france achat en ligne tinidazole 6000 astelin pas cher livraison rapide a domicile vente moduretic belgique dulcolax prix dans mercure de drogue flovent gargle achat en ligne bystolic nebivolol 5mg crestor et fertilité achat pyridium en suisse romande vasodilan pas cher index achat ditropan impuissance féminine costco singulair prix procardia 10 mg pendant la grossesse acheter plendil 100mg pfizer vente de duphalac generique vrai pletal pas cher forum trandate femme enceinte comtesse olivier de calan ventolin achat acheter seroflo sans ordonnance en espagne clozaril pas cher voyages achat hytrin générique en belgique pouvez-vous acheter viagra pharmacie betnovate pas cher avion disparu achat menosan himalayas vente zyprexa neuroleptique naturel dostinex pas cher maroczik acheter lithium livraison 48h chrono friche clomid test de grossesse faux positif atrovent pas cher indesign seroquel trouble panique achat duphalac nourrissons viagra bonne qualite vente finpecia sans ordonnance acheter arimidex prix ipad vente de citalopram en ligne acheter neurontin livraison 48h chrono achat en ligne de urispas cialis ou en acheter acheter reminyl sur internet en suisse kamagra 100 mg gel forum acheter lipothin générique france de chlorhydrate de bupropion xl 150 mg comprimé (glo) vente de allegra pas cher vente wellbutrin medicament acheter reglan meilleure façon de couper les comprimés de viagra inderal 30 mg vente libre trileptal espagne achat aleve pfizer en ligne clomid ovulation mais pas grossesse acheter lasix sans ordonnance allergie bactrim urticaire cialis 20 mg ára générique ou de marque synthroid flagyl plus alcool le fluconazole (diflucan) coût achat en ligne alesse 28 weeks achat differine en ligne ma banque ca-languedoc pletal pas cher avion télécommandé avez-vous besoin d'une prescription pour flonase effexor effets secondaires long terme coreg epgv bourgogne tinidazole 300 mg utilise pastèque viagra naturel acheter levlen 100mg achat kytril 1mg femcare pas cher voyage acheter pariet en ligne est-il un générique version de luvox achat en ligne cystone himalaya l'enfance achat cefadroxil en france rapide acheter du benzac en belgique stromectol prix en pharmacie viagra 100 mg preisvergleich gasex pas cher forum des vente colchicine pharmacie en france mestinon pas cher en ligne naruto cozaar pas cher forum routard viagra france achat cytotec en pharmacie clics achat casodex hormone cit costa aciclovir vente risperdaloro où acheter dostinex acheter lithium livraison 48h chrono zyprexa 20 mg coût augmentin et ballonnements qu'est-ce que la doxycycline mono 100mg cap amitriptyline 10mg pour l'arthrite achat en ligne probalan difference calendrier ovulation sous clomid zoloft 50 mg nausées qual o generico de aciclovir cymbalta et anesthésie combien de temps le stromectol agit il lipitor les ventes totales 2010 pamelor pas cher france canada foot feminin achat en ligne premarin quebec partage achat trileptal belgique vente libre generique lioresal pas cher en france buspar pas cher marques pas acheter du rumalaya pfizer erythromycin inde pas cher achat zithromax antibiotica acheter pas cher metformin en ligne acheter zocor en pharmacie split proscar pilules accutane costo achat toradol livraison rapide a domicile lariam pas cher marques houston vente de provera en ligne acheter alesse en pharmacie sans ordonnance phexin pas cher avion zyprexa et anorexie mentale acheter imuran sans ordonnance en belgique celebrex effets secondaires+forum achat en ligne de paxil naturel prix du lamictal lioresal pas cher marques voitures vente de floxin pas cher en france effets secondaires du crestor 5 achat bystolic en pharmacie sans ordonnance propranolol pas cher vols lipitor 40 mg pfizer viagra publicité qu'est ce que l aciclovir seroquel pour l'insomnie achat en ligne de ponstel pour achat en ligne trazodone sédation en vente cialis pharmacie en ligne l'histoire du viagra zyloprim pas cher en ligne sur viber achat alli pas cher paris lynoral pas cher maroc carte achat clomid générique augmentin grossesse et allaitement vente lopressor metoprolol migraines acheter reminyl sur internet sur l'internet achat en ligne olanzapine quebec partage implant dentaire et plavix peut on prendre motilium enceinte micardis comparaison des coûts de vente casodex sans ordonnance comment utiliser xenical orlistat 120mg acheter fertomid livraison 48h chrono 2 vente nitrofurantoin pharmacie en france acheter du trazodone pas cher en france desyrel pas cher clomid 100mg ovulation douleur doxycycline 50 mg de chlorhydrate de l'acné voveran pas cher ici mag viagra livraison buenos aires 3 mois de clomid celebrex pour hernie discale imitrex prescription assistance quand cymbalta générique aller 2013 achat coreg générique en ligne quanto costa levitra 10 mg orosolubile achat hytrin pas cher en belgique topamax pas cher en france effets secondaires zyprexa 10 mg vente de hydrea en france achat haldol livraison rapide colis acheter imitrex migraine grossesse prix avodart 0,5 mg clomid perte blanche propranolol er 80 mg migraine vente ampicillin en tunisie générique tricor prix generique anacin pas cher forum 90 mg armour synthroid équivalent acheter benemid sans ordonnance en espagne achat procardia belgique vente libre achat en ligne doxycycline vidal médical achat en ligne cyklokapron quebec acheter remeron en ligne canada pas d'effet secondaire avec clomid acheter zanaflex 100mg acheter calandre nivault acheter avodart calvitie wikipédia lasix pas cher avion papier vente de cyklokapron en pharmacie vente yasmin sans ordonnance effet secondaire effexor a long terme vente abilify sans ordonnance kamagra 100 mg cena olanzapine pas chere livraison rapide arimidex pas cher livraison gratuite nolvadex comprimés 40mg acheter atrovent inhalateur acheter nootropil sur internet je suis en alerte 100mg viagra ne fonctionne pas paxil pas cher en ligne acheter du duphalac pas cher paris prednisone fausse couche a pris deux 20mg cialis xenical ou l'acheter quelle est la différence entre prilosec ordonnance et en vente libre omeprazole achat zyban en ligne belgique doxycycline 100mg en australie achat baclofene internet promethazine pas cher maroc football achat fincar en suisse résultat des elections en françe effet secondaire viagra forum cymbalta aider avec le coût des ordonnances aristocort pas cher marocain acheter cialis en ligne de pièce de théâtre achat terramycin en pharmacie sans ordonnance ne kamagra pilules travail achat en ligne medrol 16mg methylprednisolone achat cialis en france livraison rapide prednisolone 20mg actav rcr rod20 médicament cozaar générique achat atarax canada prilosec generique pas cher en france acheter du viagra avec des bitcoins achat doxazosin 2mg procardia xl 30 mg abilify et anxiété généralisée achat en ligne flonase generique quand celebrex devenir un médicament générique zaditor pas chere achat tofranil canada lamictal pendant grossesse achat betnovate en ligne avis peut acheter tetracycline sans ordonnance costco prilosec coupon est cardizem générique lexapro prescriptions achat silagra en ligne acheter du bupropion pas cher acheter baclofen en france brest effexor et essoufflement clomid duphaston traitement wellbutrin effet secondaire indocin pas cher france canada direct flovent avant ventolin clomid duphaston et prise de poids cialis 20mg pharmacie en ligne peut on acheter du lozol en pharmacie sans ordonnance fosamax remboursement speman pas cher en ligne jeux multijoueurs achat en ligne trazodone prix vente du aspirin en pharmacie benzac pas cheres tfc vente fluoxetine pharmacie en france paxil utilisé le traitement du trouble bipolaire vente prilosec quand commencer le clomid lexapro générique citalopram cytotec ne marche pas acheter calan pas cher en france achat dostinex forum wawa le finastéride générique comprimés voltaren 25 mg k alli orlistat 60mg capsules de perte de poids de l'aide de recharge de 120 ea achat en ligne periactin 2015 en achat micronase pfizer tsh basse sous cordarone achat prandin legislation vente libre indocin suisse acheter fluoxetine pas cher et rapide plavix et ses generiques comment acheter du viagra comprimés tamoxifen pas cher forum downparadise aricept classe therapeutique legislation vente libre uroxatral suisse achat norvasc pfizer france acheter zovirax pommade ophtalmique pour chats canadiennes viagra sécurité levitra 10 mg cp orodispers anacin pas chere marque colchicine classe pharmacologique combien de temps faut-il pour 25 mg de zoloft pour travailler grepid clopidogrel 75mg achat en ligne de olanzapine générique doxycycline prévention paludisme 25 ou 50 mg de viagra costo inderal 40 mg pharmacie vente cytotec achat promethazine sirop evista pas cher indemnités nimotop famille acheter septilin en france livraison rapide acheter abilify livraison 48h chrono friche achat lamictal générique en france acheter nimotop en pharmacie sans ordonnance combien de temps dure cialis cordarone fibrose pulmonaire acheter zyprexa en ligne canada achat maxalt lyoconseil prednisone 20 mg description achat en ligne zocor vidalonline viagra pas cher indesign vente fucidin generique achat effexor lp 75mg albendazole pas cher voyage acheter du wellbutrin en belgique générique du médicament augmentin fosamax pas cher forum routard effexor 75 mg pour les bouffées de chaleur achat cialis par correspondance minocycline hcl 50 mg effets secondaires acheter trileptal sans ordonnance en espagne acheter yasmin pfizer en ligne tricor pas cher marques automobiles lamisil pas cher forum auto compazine pas cher forum auto acheter du lotrisone en pharmacie phenergan pas chere livraison rapide acheter du protonix en france acheter aspirin en ligne clomid et effet secondaire viagra canada prescription levitra 10 mg comprar va 25mg de benadryl me rendre somnolent vente viagra pfizer clomid un seul follicule acheter feldene sur internet forum achat provera pharmacie belgique achat zyprexa en ligne vente minocin sans ordonnance pharmacie achat diltiazem en suisse romande vente prinivil pfizer clonidine pas cher livraison rapide a domicile acheter actonel sur internet en suisse acheter du mobic en pharmacie en france vente cefixime posologie une femme enceinte peut prendre augmentin vente estrace acheter combivent générique en pharmacie diarex pas cher avion low
 
Common Law Review
 
Home arrow Articles arrow Issue 8 - Contract Law arrow 13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration
13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration PDF Print E-mail

When values change

Re-negotiating Consideration

Tereza Šimanovská

 

1. Introduction

Throughout history, a number of common law doctrines have developed to determine whether a contract was validly concluded and whether it is enforceable in law. One such doctrine is the need for a contract to be supported by consideration.

The basic idea behind the doctrine of consideration is reciprocity – i.e. a person should not be allowed to enforce another”s promise unless he or she has given or promised to give something in exchange for that promise.1 In essence, consideration is the “value” or “price” that one contributes towards a bargain.

Consideration must also be provided when modifying a contract. This rule of the orthodox doctrine of consideration has recently undergone a very significant change and it may have cast doubt on the future of consideration itself. The issue concerns the nature of consideration upon the variation or re-negotiation of a contract and, more specifically, when one party is promised additional money to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation.

 

2. Re-negotiation of a contract – Need for fresh consideration

Until recently it was well-established that performance of a pre-existing contractual duty owed to the other contractual party could not amount to good consideration. In plain words, when someone merely performs what he was already bound to do, such performance is not good consideration to enforce a promise of extra money. He did not provide anything additional – he did not provide any consideration for the extra money paid by the other party. It can be said that the promisee does “the same for more”.2

In reality, however, contractual renegotiations are commonplace in the daily commercial practice of almost all industries: whilst performing a previously-concluded contract, circumstances may arise which force the parties to renegotiate their agreement and alter the original price. Indeed, it seems rather unfair to deny the parties such a possibility.

When parties decide to modify a contract they should bear in mind that, just as consideration was necessary to create the original contract, “fresh” consideration is required to effect a valid modification of that original contract. There are two ways to ensure that a promise for extra money is enforceable. Either one party does something “more” than was required by the original agreement or that original agreement is discharged by both parties and a new agreement concluded.3 Traditionally, the courts have been unwilling to imply that an original agreement was “torn up” and a new one concluded – this is a conclusion they are willing to reach only where the evidence clearly supports such a finding. Regardless of how artificial these two ways may appear, if the parties wish to alter the price stipulated in the original contract, they should ensure there is fresh consideration for the promise of such additional money.

3. Traditional doctrine of Stilk v Myrick

This aspect of the consideration doctrine originates from the case of Stilk v Myrick.4 Myrick was a captain on a ship who employed Stilk to work on a Baltic Sea voyage. During the voyage two members of the crew deserted and the master promised that the remaining sailors could share the deserters” wages amongst themselves if they sailed the ship back home. Upon arrival at the dock, the master refused to honour that promise and Stilk sued for the sum. His claim failed.

When explaining the grounds upon which the judgment was decided, it must be emphasised that this case was published in two separate law reports, both of which offered different ratios. Nevertheless, Campbell”s report has generally been considered correct, and its ratio accepted as the precedent governing this area of law.5 The main reason it gives for the failure of Stilk”s claim is that the agreement lacked consideration. The sailors were not entitled to the additional payment because they merely did what they were obliged to do by virtue of their original contract. They provided no new consideration for the captain”s promise of extra money.

The other source, the Espinasse report, says that the main reason for the result was public policy. It was undesirable that it should be open to the sailors in the future to exercise improper pressure on their master to increase their wages. This report makes no reference to the fact that lack of consideration would bar the claim, and instead focuses on the need to avoid what would in modern law be referred to as economic duress.6 Economic duress exists when one party illegitimately abuses his or her superior economic power to coerce the other party into agreeing to a particular set of terms.7 A contract entered into under economic duress is voidable and may be set aside by the court.8

In any case, it has always been the first report that was applied. The rule about the existing duty laid by the Campbell report was followed many times afterwards,9 but has always been somewhat controversial. It simply does not seem fair that a party can breach his or her promise and get away with it, even if the other party acted upon that promise in good faith.

There have been some voices criticising this rule. For example, Lord Denning tried to escape it because it can often lead to unfair results. He stated in Ward v Byham10 that “a promise to perform an existing duty,11 or the performance of it, should be regarded as good consideration, because it is a benefit to the person to whom it is given.” The promisor in fact benefited from the situation – he obtained “factual benefit”.12

Nevertheless, most of the judiciary were not willing to come to such radical conclusions. In Ward v Byham the remaining judges expressly refused Lord Denning”s revolutionary proposition. Throughout history, rather than going against the traditional doctrine, courts were often ready to find consideration even where one could say that there was none to be found. Sometimes it is said that courts “invented consideration” to abide by the orthodox doctrine.13

4. Revolution against the old approach: No legal benefit necessary

The controversial case of Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd.14 might be labelled as falling into this category. This decision has dramatically changed the traditional doctrine regarding pre-existing contractual duty and has cast great uncertainty over the future development of consideration in this area.

 

4.1 Williams v Roffey

The Roffey Brothers were builders who contracted with a housing association to refurbish a block of 27 flats. They sub-contracted the carpentry work to Williams for £20,000. Williams got into financial difficulties and it was apparent that he might not be able to complete the work on time. It was mainly because Wiliams had underpriced his contract. The second reason was deficiency in William”s supervision of his workers. Roffey Bros. became worried that they would be liable under a penalty clause in their main contract and promised Williams an additional sum of £10,300. This was to be paid at the rate of £575 per flat on completion. Williams finished eight more flats but only received £1,500. Williams ultimately sued Roffey Bros. for the remaining sum.

The main issue before the Court of Appeals was whether Williams provided consideration for the additional £10,300 promised by Roffey Bros. The court held that the agreement to pay the extra money was enforceable. This came as a great surprise. It defied the traditional rule set out in Stilk v Myrick. What was the consideration provided by Williams? He only did the work that he was bound to do by his original agreement – he only performed a duty already owed to Roffey.

 

4.2 New form of consideration: Practical benefit

In Williams v. Roffey, the court found valid consideration in the practical benefit that Roffey obtained by his agreement with Williams. So far the practical/factual benefit (Denning) has been refused as good consideration. The argument has always been that consideration must be something of value in the eyes of law – something that provides or brings about a legal benefit.

What was this practical benefit? It consisted of a number of factors. The court held that it was the fact that Williams continued his work and did not breach the sub-contract. Therefore, Roffey avoided the trouble of looking for somebody else to complete the work. Furthermore, Roffey avoided the penalty payment for the delay under the main contract. Also, by directing the claimant to complete one flat at a time, the defendant was able to organize their work with other subcontractors in a more efficient manner. It is clear that the logic of “factual benefit” earlier argued by Lord Denning was applied here. Even though there was no legal benefit to Roffey, the contractual modification, in fact, benefited Roffey.

It is questionable whether this reasoning about “practical benefits” is persuasive enough to disregard the need for a legal benefit and change this rule in such a dramatic way. When looking at each of the “practical benefits”, one realizes that they do not consist of anything additional. Roffey would have received all of these benefits under the original contract, even if it were not modified. In fact, all of these new “advantages” were the very reason why they concluded the original contract. Williams was hired as the subcontractor to do the work. Therefore, the main purpose here was not to look for anyone else to do the job. Similarly, the fact that Roffey did not have to pay the penalty because the plaintiff continued the work was the very reason that a subcontractor would have been hired initially. The question is: how can this count as a fresh consideration? Was this not yet another “invented consideration” by the courts?

 

4.3 Practical benefit justified by commercial reality

On the other hand, it can be argued that this pragmatic decision finally concedes what can be called “commercial reality”. After all, it is a common practice in the building industry for the main contractor to increase sub-contractors” payments if the parties see that the price is too low. As the counsel for the plaintiff argued, “It would be unfortunate if English law deprived an acceptable commercial practice, which both parties regard as beneficial, of legal effect.” Thus, the court should look at the situation as it stands and acknowledge what in fact is beneficial for the parties, as opposed to seeking a theoretical “legal benefit”. The preference should be given to what the actual intention of the parties was when renegotiating the contract, so that their intended agreement is given effect. Would it not be unfair to negate their clear arrangement that was entered into voluntarily? Russel LJ said: “Consideration there must be but courts should be more ready to find its existence as to reflect the intention of the parties.”

Obviously, there are two competing principles to be weighed regarding the doctrine of consideration. It can be said that modifications are in the public interest and both parties should be encouraged to bargain their way out of an unanticipated difficulty. On the other hand, it is also desirable to hold parties to the contractual terms of their bargain.15 Clearly, there are pros and cons to each of the two conflicting interests.

 

5. Potential escape from a contract as a value?

Another issue should be contemplated in this area. It was said that Williams suffered a detriment by continuing the work and not breaching the contract. His counsel argued “he (Williams) might have been better off by breaking the contract, getting higher paid work elsewhere and paying such damages as the contractor can recover against him”.16 Can this constitute good consideration? Can this be anything of value in the eyes of law? This proposition seems to undermine the sanctity of contracts. It is an old principle of law that people should be held to their bargains – Pacta sunt servanda. Therefore, the legal practice should promote this principle and not acknowledge that a threatened breach of contract is a viable basis for finding consideration. Such reasoning does not seem correct as a part of legal practice.

Threatening with breach of contract to increase the agreed price is indeed walking on thin ice. As mentioned above, agreements that are achieved by illegitimate pressure exercised by the party with greater economic power can be set aside on the grounds of economic duress.17 It was very important that in Williams v Roffey duress was not established on the facts of the case. The main reason that the judgment was given for Williams was almost certainly because duress was not involved. Roffey called for the meeting because it was obvious that the work would not be finished as planned. Williams did not explicitly threaten with breach of contract.

 

6. Consequences of the new approach to consideration

Undoubtedly, Williams v Roffey significantly widened the scope of the doctrine of consideration. Promises to perform existing duties can now be good consideration when they lead to practical benefit. As the doctrine of duress is a relatively new concept (first acknowledged in 1976), in the past, courts used consideration in situations that would nowadays be judged in terms of duress. In situations like those in Stilk v Myrick, the judge could not avail himself of economic duress and instead used lack of consideration as the reason for his judgment. Thus, a case like Stilk would be decided differently today. Most likely, it would be brought as a duress case and not necessarily fail for lack of consideration. It could be stated that the Court of Appeals followed the reasoning from the Espinasse report.18

 

6.1 Reconciliation of Stilk v Myrick and Williams v Roffey

It would seem that Williams v Roffey overruled Stilk v Myrick, but the court emphasized that Stilk still remains good law and distinguished Williams v Roffey. Glidwell LJ said that Williams v Roffey does not contravene the principles from Stilk, but that it “refines and limits” the application of them. However, it is not wholly clear from the judgment on what basis the court arrived at this conclusion. The judges argued that the rigid approach to consideration in Stilk was only a product of the special conditions of the seafare in the 18th century, and that it was too harsh to exist without changes in the modern day. However, the two cases are very similar. Myrick also obtained practical benefit because the sailors continued performance of their contract. Furthermore, Williams v Roffey was later applied in an employment case19 where it was held that when an employee”s wage is increased, sufficient consideration for the increase is the fact that the employee continues his or her work and does not try to bargain for more money.20 Is this not exactly the same situation as in Stilk?

Even if the court was so resolute that Stilk has not been overruled, it seems difficult to defend this idea for much longer. The conclusion could be drawn that the only principle that has survived the attack of Williams v Roffey is that consideration is still required when modifying a contract, while Stilk has been overruled as to what counts as fresh consideration.21

6.2 Application in day-to-day business

It is without a doubt that “practical benefit” is now a recognized category that can be used in practice to establish consideration. Lawyers arguing enforcement of promises for extra payment when the consideration is of doubtful value should avail themselves of “practical benefit” and argue that effect should be given to “commercial reality.” Furthermore, lawyers should argue that it is in the interest of the parties to reach a viable solution that is acceptable to everyone. It is, after all, in the public interest to bargain one”s way out of a stalemate rather than end up in a costly litigation process.

On the other hand, it has become more difficult for the opposing party to attack such contractual modifications because it is no longer so simple to plead lack of consideration where some sort of benefit can be found. It should be argued that there is no legal or practical benefit, and therefore no consideration. The security of contracts should be emphasized – people should get what they bargain for and not be pushed to pay more if difficulties arise. Any sign of duress makes such modification unenforceable. Therefore, one should always look at the process of renegotiation. Simply, was there any sign of improper pressure from the party who was in the stronger contractual position? If so, economic duress should be pleaded as a vitiating factor to the promise.

Williams v Roffey has since been applied in two cases,22 both dealing with renegotiation of commercial contracts. In each case it was held that consideration lay in the “practical benefit” that one party obtained because the other party did not breach the contract and continued its performance.23

 

7. Conclusion: What is the future of consideration?

A new liberal approach has been set. Courts are now more willing to find consideration just to give effect to what they perceive as the actual intent of the parties. This tolerant attitude is counter-balanced by the use of duress as the tool to limit bargains that have been achieved by improper means. The issue is whether this situation is wholly satisfactory. Courts have not been clear enough about the future application of this new approach, and it is evident that the doctrine of consideration in this area has been plunged into confusion.

These reflections might lead to a more revolutionary interpretation of Williams v Roffey. Is there really a need for consideration when varying a contract? American law, for example, does not require it.24 Maybe it is finally time to stop being too afraid of changes and to move ahead. After all, is this not the real unexpressed meaning of Williams v Roffey? It seems that law would become more efficient without the formalistic burden of consideration when modifying a contract.

Reflections about contractual modifications might logically lead us even further. Is consideration necessary at all? It appears that consideration as a principle is still adhered to, but this effort has become somewhat forced. The civil law system can do well without consideration. There exists an increasing hostility towards the old doctrine. It has become more of a technical obstacle than a useful and essential tool. Maybe the modern law should finally get rid of this ancient principle and replace it with more effective doctrines.

Were the judges too afraid to explicitly admit that Williams v Roffey might be the beginning of the end of consideration?

Tereza Šimanovská is a second-year law student at the Faculty of Law, Charles University in Prague. She has spent one year in London, where she studied at the Faculty of Law at the University of Westminster.

 

 

 

Bibliography


Atiyah P S, Essays on Contract, 1st Edition, Reprinted (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2001)


Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005)


McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005)


Noble M, For Your Consideration, November 8 1991, New Law Journal, Butterworth &Co (Publishers) Ltd


Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005)


Treitel G, Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2002)

 

 

...................

1 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 85

2 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp147

3 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 96

4 Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Camp 317 and 6 Esp 129

5 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 95

6 Ibid

7 Ibid pp 358

8 Nevertheless, there is no evidence that the sailors in Stilk v Myrick actually used any pressure to get the extra money. On the contract, it was Myrick himself who promised the increase of wages because he needed to get the ship home. Thus, whilst no actual duress was proved in this, the decision aimed to pre-emptively prevent such situations occurring in the future.

9 For example Atlas Express v Kafco [1989] QB 833

10 Ward v Byham [1956] 1 WLR 496

11 However, here Lord Denning was concerned with a pre-existing duty deriving from public law, not a duty owed under a contract.

12 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp 145

13 Prof Treitel as cited in McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 86

14 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

15 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 99

16 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

17 However, a distinction should be made between threats of breach of contract that amount to economic duress and behaviour that only amounts to acceptable commercial pressure. It should be highlighted that at the moment the law is not very clear about where the exact borderline lays. It seems that not all threats of breach of contract are automatically illegal.

18 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 100

19 Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications [1993] IRLR 383

20 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

21 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp153

22 Anangel Atlas Compania Naviera SA v Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co Ltd (no 2) [1990] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 526; Simon Container Machinery Ltd v Emba Machinery AB [1998] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 429

23 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

24 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 102.

 
< Prev   Next >