Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/php-tmp/upload) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 348

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361
legislation vente libre lasuna suisse altace pas cher vols aldactone et acnĂ© acheter alavert pfizer belgique acheter duetact forum avis cephalexin 1000 mg pour les chiens achat indinavir en pharmacie en ligne coreg pas cher avion pas rosuvastatin pas cher france canada basket ce este anafranil descendre de 25 mg seroquel achat zyrtec pas chere achat azulfidine pfizer en ligne prometrium debut de grossesse acheter confido en ligne avis cozaar pas cher france canada direct achat en ligne bupron srlf achat indocin pharmacie sans ordonnance vente paroxetine pharmacie vente ayurslim libre achat remeron livraison rapide colis effets secondaires de la elavil dose de 30 mg nexium 40 mg vidal achat cymbalta gĂ©nĂ©rique en ligne xeloda 500mg coĂ»ts serdep 20mg fluoxetine achat en ligne allopurinol vidal marine cialis fabriquĂ© en france vrai aciclovir pas cher en france cymbalta et tabac micardis 20 mg effets secondaires achat en ligne coumadin acheter viagra pfizer sans ordonnance bupropion hcl 150mg xl onglet ce achat plendil en suisse rĂ©sultat des elections en françe ralista pas cher forum doctissimo motilium en belgique fluoxetine pas cher forum grossesse anafranil et lysanxia minomycin pas cher france canada hockey faut il une ordonnance pour acheter du cialis en pharmacie achat lithium acheter du menosan en pharmacie sans ordonnance ou acheter stromectol sans ordonnance Ă  bruxelles exelon pas cher en ligne pour l'emploi vente saw palmetto france fosamax pas cher avion papier acheter evista osteoporose corticale prometrium vente libre pharmacie suisse erythromycin pas cher maroc actualitĂ©s tofranil pas cher livraison rapide fleurs combien est viagra coĂ»t en bottes vente augmentin 500 gĂ©nĂ©rique vermox et oxyures viagra et sportif isotretinoin capsules usp 20 mg utilise acheter caverta en france sans ordonnance ponstel pas cher avion disparu achat dapoxetine en suisse achat fincar belgique vente libre lincocin pas cher inde achat haldol livraison rapide prise de clomid pour tomber enceinte achat duphalac en france livraison rapide n'prescription lamisil travail acheter effexor sans ordonnance mĂ©dicaments cystite achat seroflo en suisse acheter generique cialis en france mĂ©dicaments et grossesse zoloft vente chloramphenicol collyre antiallergique acheter du cozaar en belgique achat en ligne metoclopramide primperan enceinte kamagra gel effet secondaire clopidogrel du canada nolvadex autorisation seroquel pas cher comment souvent de prendre voltaren 50mg achat en ligne decadron quebec streaming vente differing achat en ligne trazodone forum viagra 24 heures plavix 75 le prix de l'inde fertomid pas cher livraison rapide a domicile peut acheter mentat sans ordonnance achat en ligne betnovate creamy l'augmentation de lexapro mg Ă  15 mg comment prendre comprimĂ©s cytotec tegretol fait il grossir diltiazem grageas 30 mg vente chloromycetin france ou assimilĂ© achat kytril pharmacie belge vente de prinivil generique achat prandin pas cher paris generic entocort pas cher en france clomid duphaston effet secondaire vente augmentin 1g dosage pouvez-vous prendre une demi-20mg cialis acheter furosemide 40 en france aujourd hui digoxin 0.125 mg par jour la clinique de la fibre 4 orlistat 150 mg àžŁàžČàž„àžČ zithromax pas cher livraison rapide fleurs vente de precose pas cher paris arret de travail cytotec prednisolone 30 mg pour l'asthme achat chloroquine en ligne sans ordonnance vente tetracycline 1% employeur pilule celebrex effet secondaire vente levlen en pharmacie achat en ligne accutane chibro proscar chute de cheveux feldene pas cher forum auto acheter benadryl 100mg prix acheter erythromycin sans ordonnance en france acheter reminyl livraison 48h chrono peugeot quand levitra est disponible comme un gĂ©nĂ©rique chloromycetin eye drops prix achat geriforte en suisse romande strattera pas cher index acheter colchicine internet forum maxalt pas cher forum grossesse pastilla de cialis 5 mg coumadin pas chere livraison rapide Ă  quelle frĂ©quence devriez-vous prendre 800 mg motrin effexor 75 et grossesse achat toradol en france combien de temps ne viagra 25 mg dernier l'efficacitĂ© de paxil gĂ©nĂ©rique comment arreter le zyprexa vente micronase levitra 5mg 10mg 20mg pelliculĂ© acheter erythromycin en ligne en australie xenical 120 mg rezeptfrei flagyl ovule avec ou sans ordonnance achat tamoxifen pfizer en ligne acheter bactroban indications musicales combien coĂ»te gĂ©nĂ©rique effexor coĂ»t achat lisinopril en ligne france venlor pas cher forum des acheter du carafate en pharmacie propecia cheveux blancs metoclopramide pas cher maroc football achat allegra chĂąlons achat elimite gĂ©nĂ©rique en ligne achat saw palmetto side effects levlen pas cher avion pas augmentin 652 mg achat en ligne clozaril prix clomid taux reussite prednisone douleurs articulaires achat levitra en ligne sans ordonnance achat proventil en belgique acheter skelaxin en pharmacie medicamento aldactone 50 mg acheter diarex en france avec paypal prix du evista en malaisie acheter dapoxetine en france livraison 48h chrono forum achat cialis sur internet acheter cardura pfizer acheter terramycin en france avec paypal infection urinaire sous augmentin acheter du serophene en france premarin vag la crĂšme des coĂ»ts acheter cystone sans ordonnance forum acheter dutas en ligne sans ordonnance allegra d costco pilules qui ressemblent lexapro acheter zyban pas cher avion acheter antabuse sur internet avis trazodone 100 mg comprimĂ© oral cefixime vente libre pharmacie suisse zyrtec pas chere chaussure achat ranitidine effervescente brioschi biaxin pas cher en ligne pour l'emploi vrai trandate pas cher en france cvs zyrtec d prix eulexin pas cher vols oĂč puis-je acheter ventolin sur les compteurs omnicef pas cher en ligne de mire acheter du cafergot pas cher acheter tricor original acheter nizagara pfizer vente brahmi difference achat xeloda 500 mg forum achat cialis pas cher en france zithromax agit combien de temps lamictal pas cher paris nice achat tegretol en ligne canada accutane vente libre de cialis annonce vente bupropion tunisie les effets secondaires du tegretol traitement hyperthyroidie sous cordarone acheter anacin sans ordonnance en belgique zyvox pas cher marquesboutique achat coumadin diet accutane inde pas cher cialis 4cpr riv 10 mg oĂč puis-je acheter propranolol au royaume-uni achat eulexin pas chere durĂ©e sevrage cymbalta apo-paroxetine 30mg zanaflex pas cher forum femara et oedeme generique nizagara pas cher legislation vente libre lamisil suisse c'est quoi le medicament clomid motilium pas cher avion tĂ©lĂ©commandĂ© quand avez-clopidogrel gĂ©nĂ©rique aller abilify alcool effets dapoxetine pas cher france canada direct vente vytorin libre generique mircette pas chere prednisone 20 mg utilisĂ© pour ce cialis pas cher marseille 2013 orlistat 120 mg prix en inde finpecia pas cher en ligne pour l'emploi cialis en ligne durant la nuit coumadin pas cher en pharmacie vente stromectol difference para quĂ© servir o remedio propranolol 40mg lamictal dc 50 mg cozunur 30 cigneme tableti fiyatı achat en ligne menosan achat vente estrace mĂ©dicament bactrim forte duree traitement acheter valtrex en ligne par virement bancaire lamisil vernis meilleur viagra prix en inde le coĂ»t de cialis au manitoba achat en ligne clonidine buymystyle acheter du aciphex en belgique sans ordonnance voltaren pas cher forum des achat zovirax 800 mg vente bupropion vidal en tamoxifen pilules pour la vente vente zestril hypertension pulmonaire achat geriforte gĂ©nĂ©rique en belgique forum ou acheter cialis en ligne achat en ligne de ginseng pour acheter betapace gĂ©nĂ©rique achat propranolol sans ordonnance forum hardware achat en ligne stromectol enfant 44 achat roxithromycine sandoz vente shatavari generique france vente nootropil achat en ligne celexa quebecos achat cymbalta en suisse ou au surinam avez-vous besoin d'ordonnance pour le viagra Ă  singapour achat atrovent nebuliseur achat en ligne cytotec fausse couche douleurs acheter glycomet 100mg achat lynoral generique zoloft 50 mg trop lamisil et bilan hepatique forum propecia effets secondaires clonidine pas chere voyage quand prendre clomid 100mg lipitor 20 mg para que servir achat lamictal 200 mg vente de orlistat en pharmacie vente amantadine parkinson disease meclizine pas cher forum grossesse l'interaction entre synthroid et les pilules contraceptives chloromycetin pas cher marques pas wellbutrin maux de tĂȘte propecia 5 mg 1mg vrai diabecon pas chere stromectol effets indĂ©sirables forum acheter lozol sans ordonnance vente minocycline biogaran avis achat en ligne micronase generic plus d'ovulation sous clomid achat uroxatral gĂ©nĂ©rique en belgique lipitor pas cher vol algerie lipitor pas cher marques voitures lynoral pas cher maroc annonces achat risperdal gĂ©nĂ©rique en belgique vente danazol pfizer medrol pas cher forum hardware vente duphalac notice d'utilisation amoxil pas cher en pharmacie viagra pour la vente en singapour vente de clomid pas cher forum medrol pas cher france canada direct exelon inde pas cher sevrage de lamictal effets possibles micardis sinusite afin gĂ©nĂ©rique cialis par tĂ©lĂ©phone achat en ligne de vantin naturel acheter abana en france pas cher acheter bupropion sans ordonnance en france zenegra pas cher france canada coupe du monde j'ai pris une dose de 2000 mg de seroquel achat nimotop generique acheter viagra site fiable wellbutrin xl de 450 mg de tdah olanzapine pas cher inde pour ou contre clomid finasteride 5mg vs avodart achat en ligne pariet rabĂ©prazole sandoz monitorage de l'ovulation clomid oĂč acheter prednisolone 5mg pour chien acheter lasuna pas cher en france cefixime pas cher indesign achat en ligne de pariet masculin effets secondaires abilify 5mg commander cialis sur le net brĂ»leur de graisse pilules de xenical achat colospa canada pletal pas cher marques vĂȘtements acheter acticin pfizer belgique augmentin abcĂšs dentaire lipitor changement de prix prix pour imuran quel entrain ce matin viagra rosuvastatin prix costco achat motrin achat zithromax en ligne maroc achat en ligne trental 400 coup vrai cafergot pas cher paris cabgolin pas cher marocain prednisolone contre la toux trileptal pas chere marque acheter du nootropil pas cher en france zovirax pas cher vol vente allopurinol mylan medicament achat en ligne exelon novartis suisse vente alli en france cialis 10 mg efficacitĂ© acheter haldol en france achat en ligne fluoxetine zydus laboratoire le motilium est il dangereux lisinopril 10 mg la perte de cheveux acheter duetact internet forum acheter du zofran en pharmacie acheter actos prix nobel acheter compazine en ligne acheter lamictal internet forum oĂč pouvez-vous acheter zithromax aldactone 100 mg posologia acheter viagra pfizer belgique combien coĂ»te nexium 40 mg coĂ»t sans assurance achat ceftin en ligne avis acheter du ditropan pas cher en france apo rosuvastatin 10 mg effets secondaires propranolol pendant la grossesse achat cafergot vente plavix clopidogrel 75mg achat en ligne diflucan quebec team achat en ligne levlen vente achat en ligne caverta 100 % achat tricor en ligne en france acheter du naprosyn generique sur internet effets secondaires de l'antibiotique augmentin vente de zithromax generique amitriptyline pas cher ici acheter viagra pharmacie acheter cholestoplex pas cher achat periactin en suisse ou au surinam achat carafate achat en ligne dilantin iveco prograf pas cher voyage effets secondaires cardizem achat en ligne synthroid comparaison viagra nous pharmacie prix acheter hoodia gordonii pure achat diflucan en france et sans ordonnance lamictal et anxiĂ©tĂ© acheter benzac sans ordonnance en pharmacie promethazine pas cher marques cabgolin pas cher marques vĂȘtements zoloft dosage pour le trouble d'anxiĂ©tĂ© plavix gĂ©nĂ©rique usa 500 mg de metformine une fois par jour peut on acheter du bupron sr en pharmacie diflucan pas cher france canada que es keflex 500 mg canadienne celebrex en ligne acheter tretinoin cream canada acheter du biaxin pas chere acheter nimotop livraison 48h chrono acheter finpecia 100mg achat en ligne buspar quebecoise xeloda et vertiges crestor et oedeme nexium pas cher livraison rapide fleurs acheter benicar 100mg pfizer cialis tadalafil 20 mg 30 lu indinavir pas cher en ligne upmc acheter anafranil pharmacie acheter paroxetine pas cher sans ordonnance achat en ligne serpina comparaison acheter bentyl en ligne en france bupropion sr gĂ©nĂ©rique fabricants zetia 10 mg en espanol trazodone pour insomnie achat en ligne eurax quebec acheter prednisone en ligne paypal etodolac pas cher livraison rapide colis achat advair 250 ml bouffĂ©es de chaleur avec clomid acheter levitra en ligne en toute sĂ©curitĂ© achat clonidine pas cher forum acheter indinavir sans ordonnance en espagne ce qui est aldactone 50 mg utilisĂ© pour cesser synthroid achat lexapro livraison rapide effets secondaires de chlorhydrate de diltiazem er 240 mg capsules generico de lamisil achat arava pharmacie sans ordonnance acheter risperdal en ligne par virement bancaire zaditor pas cher avion nexium msr tablette 40mg achat en ligne de betnovate pour colospa pas cher paris acheter avapro forum chibro proscar ordonnance achat en ligne plavix mĂ©dicament vĂ©tĂ©rinaire acheter exelon alzheimer dĂ©finition viagra pharmacie en ligne france acheter aricept gĂ©nĂ©rique quel site pour achat cialis aciclovir sirop posologie vente de cytotec au senegal renagel sonde vente de requip pas cher achat alli generique en france cholestoplex pas cher livraison rapide achat differin en ligne sans ordonnance vente ashwagandha pas cher vente suhagra prix acheter menosan forum discussion acheter aleve pharmacie acheter cafergot original en france remboursement viagra secu petite annonce cialis ic prednisolone 15mg sod acheter diclofenac en france sans ordonnance abilify 20 mg coĂ»t achat de pletal pfizer vytorin bula generico puis-je acheter ciprofloxacin over the counter uk vente ayurslim chine acheter zovirax lamictal doctissimo achat flomax livraison rapide colis allergie augmentin traitement achat en ligne zyban posologie cĂ©lestĂšne celadrin pas cher marques vĂȘtements aleve naproxen sodium comprimĂ©s de 220 mg usp amoxil pour angines vente celexa espagne achat en ligne tinidazole vente styplon pas cher forum wawa vente kamagra en ligne tunisie achat cardizem en france livraison rapide prednisone 5mg ordonnance costco prix en pharmacie de cialis une alternative moins coĂ»teuse aux crestor parlodel ne marche pas achat en ligne mestinon vente requip 1 mg effexor xr canada achat imitrex posologie euphytose acheter minocycline forum downparadise renagel pas cher france canada rugby augmentin fait il dormir trimox pas cher paris nice cystone pas chere marque achat florinef belgique vente libre plendil pas cher livraison rapide achat en ligne periactine sirop cialis revue en ligne pharmacie en ligne acheter micardis en ligne cialis 20 en ligne acheter colchicine vidal santĂ© canada ciprofloxacin ou acheter emsam sans ordonnance Ă  bruxelles achat risperdal en ligne acheter deltasone achat en ligne femara prix vente casodex france ou assimilĂ© acheter naprosyn gĂ©nĂ©rique en france eldepryl pas cher forum voyage vente seroquel en belgique qu'est-ce que les mĂ©dicaments gĂ©nĂ©riques prednisone pour vente himcocid en tunisie achat actonel en ligne maroc acheter medrol gĂ©nĂ©rique france avis cialis 20 generique saw palmetto pas chere cialis prix pharmacie paris finasteride 1 mg impotencia qu'est-ce que effexor xr 75mg flagyl ovules gardnerella astelin pas cher marquesboutique cialis et saignement de nez prednisone effets secondaires 25 mg calan 80 mg comprimĂ©s clonidine effets indĂ©sirables alli pas cher forum voyage achat v-gel en pharmacie en ligne
 
Common Law Review
 
Domù arrow Èlánky arrow Issue 8 - Contract Law arrow 13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration
13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration PDF Tisk E-mail

When values change

Re-negotiating Consideration

Tereza Šimanovská

 

1. Introduction

Throughout history, a number of common law doctrines have developed to determine whether a contract was validly concluded and whether it is enforceable in law. One such doctrine is the need for a contract to be supported by consideration.

The basic idea behind the doctrine of consideration is reciprocity – i.e. a person should not be allowed to enforce another”s promise unless he or she has given or promised to give something in exchange for that promise.1 In essence, consideration is the “value” or “price” that one contributes towards a bargain.

Consideration must also be provided when modifying a contract. This rule of the orthodox doctrine of consideration has recently undergone a very significant change and it may have cast doubt on the future of consideration itself. The issue concerns the nature of consideration upon the variation or re-negotiation of a contract and, more specifically, when one party is promised additional money to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation.

 

2. Re-negotiation of a contract – Need for fresh consideration

Until recently it was well-established that performance of a pre-existing contractual duty owed to the other contractual party could not amount to good consideration. In plain words, when someone merely performs what he was already bound to do, such performance is not good consideration to enforce a promise of extra money. He did not provide anything additional – he did not provide any consideration for the extra money paid by the other party. It can be said that the promisee does “the same for more”.2

In reality, however, contractual renegotiations are commonplace in the daily commercial practice of almost all industries: whilst performing a previously-concluded contract, circumstances may arise which force the parties to renegotiate their agreement and alter the original price. Indeed, it seems rather unfair to deny the parties such a possibility.

When parties decide to modify a contract they should bear in mind that, just as consideration was necessary to create the original contract, “fresh” consideration is required to effect a valid modification of that original contract. There are two ways to ensure that a promise for extra money is enforceable. Either one party does something “more” than was required by the original agreement or that original agreement is discharged by both parties and a new agreement concluded.3 Traditionally, the courts have been unwilling to imply that an original agreement was “torn up” and a new one concluded – this is a conclusion they are willing to reach only where the evidence clearly supports such a finding. Regardless of how artificial these two ways may appear, if the parties wish to alter the price stipulated in the original contract, they should ensure there is fresh consideration for the promise of such additional money.

3. Traditional doctrine of Stilk v Myrick

This aspect of the consideration doctrine originates from the case of Stilk v Myrick.4 Myrick was a captain on a ship who employed Stilk to work on a Baltic Sea voyage. During the voyage two members of the crew deserted and the master promised that the remaining sailors could share the deserters” wages amongst themselves if they sailed the ship back home. Upon arrival at the dock, the master refused to honour that promise and Stilk sued for the sum. His claim failed.

When explaining the grounds upon which the judgment was decided, it must be emphasised that this case was published in two separate law reports, both of which offered different ratios. Nevertheless, Campbell”s report has generally been considered correct, and its ratio accepted as the precedent governing this area of law.5 The main reason it gives for the failure of Stilk”s claim is that the agreement lacked consideration. The sailors were not entitled to the additional payment because they merely did what they were obliged to do by virtue of their original contract. They provided no new consideration for the captain”s promise of extra money.

The other source, the Espinasse report, says that the main reason for the result was public policy. It was undesirable that it should be open to the sailors in the future to exercise improper pressure on their master to increase their wages. This report makes no reference to the fact that lack of consideration would bar the claim, and instead focuses on the need to avoid what would in modern law be referred to as economic duress.6 Economic duress exists when one party illegitimately abuses his or her superior economic power to coerce the other party into agreeing to a particular set of terms.7 A contract entered into under economic duress is voidable and may be set aside by the court.8

In any case, it has always been the first report that was applied. The rule about the existing duty laid by the Campbell report was followed many times afterwards,9 but has always been somewhat controversial. It simply does not seem fair that a party can breach his or her promise and get away with it, even if the other party acted upon that promise in good faith.

There have been some voices criticising this rule. For example, Lord Denning tried to escape it because it can often lead to unfair results. He stated in Ward v Byham10 that “a promise to perform an existing duty,11 or the performance of it, should be regarded as good consideration, because it is a benefit to the person to whom it is given.” The promisor in fact benefited from the situation – he obtained “factual benefit”.12

Nevertheless, most of the judiciary were not willing to come to such radical conclusions. In Ward v Byham the remaining judges expressly refused Lord Denning”s revolutionary proposition. Throughout history, rather than going against the traditional doctrine, courts were often ready to find consideration even where one could say that there was none to be found. Sometimes it is said that courts “invented consideration” to abide by the orthodox doctrine.13

4. Revolution against the old approach: No legal benefit necessary

The controversial case of Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd.14 might be labelled as falling into this category. This decision has dramatically changed the traditional doctrine regarding pre-existing contractual duty and has cast great uncertainty over the future development of consideration in this area.

 

4.1 Williams v Roffey

The Roffey Brothers were builders who contracted with a housing association to refurbish a block of 27 flats. They sub-contracted the carpentry work to Williams for £20,000. Williams got into financial difficulties and it was apparent that he might not be able to complete the work on time. It was mainly because Wiliams had underpriced his contract. The second reason was deficiency in William”s supervision of his workers. Roffey Bros. became worried that they would be liable under a penalty clause in their main contract and promised Williams an additional sum of £10,300. This was to be paid at the rate of £575 per flat on completion. Williams finished eight more flats but only received £1,500. Williams ultimately sued Roffey Bros. for the remaining sum.

The main issue before the Court of Appeals was whether Williams provided consideration for the additional £10,300 promised by Roffey Bros. The court held that the agreement to pay the extra money was enforceable. This came as a great surprise. It defied the traditional rule set out in Stilk v Myrick. What was the consideration provided by Williams? He only did the work that he was bound to do by his original agreement – he only performed a duty already owed to Roffey.

 

4.2 New form of consideration: Practical benefit

In Williams v. Roffey, the court found valid consideration in the practical benefit that Roffey obtained by his agreement with Williams. So far the practical/factual benefit (Denning) has been refused as good consideration. The argument has always been that consideration must be something of value in the eyes of law – something that provides or brings about a legal benefit.

What was this practical benefit? It consisted of a number of factors. The court held that it was the fact that Williams continued his work and did not breach the sub-contract. Therefore, Roffey avoided the trouble of looking for somebody else to complete the work. Furthermore, Roffey avoided the penalty payment for the delay under the main contract. Also, by directing the claimant to complete one flat at a time, the defendant was able to organize their work with other subcontractors in a more efficient manner. It is clear that the logic of “factual benefit” earlier argued by Lord Denning was applied here. Even though there was no legal benefit to Roffey, the contractual modification, in fact, benefited Roffey.

It is questionable whether this reasoning about “practical benefits” is persuasive enough to disregard the need for a legal benefit and change this rule in such a dramatic way. When looking at each of the “practical benefits”, one realizes that they do not consist of anything additional. Roffey would have received all of these benefits under the original contract, even if it were not modified. In fact, all of these new “advantages” were the very reason why they concluded the original contract. Williams was hired as the subcontractor to do the work. Therefore, the main purpose here was not to look for anyone else to do the job. Similarly, the fact that Roffey did not have to pay the penalty because the plaintiff continued the work was the very reason that a subcontractor would have been hired initially. The question is: how can this count as a fresh consideration? Was this not yet another “invented consideration” by the courts?

 

4.3 Practical benefit justified by commercial reality

On the other hand, it can be argued that this pragmatic decision finally concedes what can be called “commercial reality”. After all, it is a common practice in the building industry for the main contractor to increase sub-contractors” payments if the parties see that the price is too low. As the counsel for the plaintiff argued, “It would be unfortunate if English law deprived an acceptable commercial practice, which both parties regard as beneficial, of legal effect.” Thus, the court should look at the situation as it stands and acknowledge what in fact is beneficial for the parties, as opposed to seeking a theoretical “legal benefit”. The preference should be given to what the actual intention of the parties was when renegotiating the contract, so that their intended agreement is given effect. Would it not be unfair to negate their clear arrangement that was entered into voluntarily? Russel LJ said: “Consideration there must be but courts should be more ready to find its existence as to reflect the intention of the parties.”

Obviously, there are two competing principles to be weighed regarding the doctrine of consideration. It can be said that modifications are in the public interest and both parties should be encouraged to bargain their way out of an unanticipated difficulty. On the other hand, it is also desirable to hold parties to the contractual terms of their bargain.15 Clearly, there are pros and cons to each of the two conflicting interests.

 

5. Potential escape from a contract as a value?

Another issue should be contemplated in this area. It was said that Williams suffered a detriment by continuing the work and not breaching the contract. His counsel argued “he (Williams) might have been better off by breaking the contract, getting higher paid work elsewhere and paying such damages as the contractor can recover against him”.16 Can this constitute good consideration? Can this be anything of value in the eyes of law? This proposition seems to undermine the sanctity of contracts. It is an old principle of law that people should be held to their bargains – Pacta sunt servanda. Therefore, the legal practice should promote this principle and not acknowledge that a threatened breach of contract is a viable basis for finding consideration. Such reasoning does not seem correct as a part of legal practice.

Threatening with breach of contract to increase the agreed price is indeed walking on thin ice. As mentioned above, agreements that are achieved by illegitimate pressure exercised by the party with greater economic power can be set aside on the grounds of economic duress.17 It was very important that in Williams v Roffey duress was not established on the facts of the case. The main reason that the judgment was given for Williams was almost certainly because duress was not involved. Roffey called for the meeting because it was obvious that the work would not be finished as planned. Williams did not explicitly threaten with breach of contract.

 

6. Consequences of the new approach to consideration

Undoubtedly, Williams v Roffey significantly widened the scope of the doctrine of consideration. Promises to perform existing duties can now be good consideration when they lead to practical benefit. As the doctrine of duress is a relatively new concept (first acknowledged in 1976), in the past, courts used consideration in situations that would nowadays be judged in terms of duress. In situations like those in Stilk v Myrick, the judge could not avail himself of economic duress and instead used lack of consideration as the reason for his judgment. Thus, a case like Stilk would be decided differently today. Most likely, it would be brought as a duress case and not necessarily fail for lack of consideration. It could be stated that the Court of Appeals followed the reasoning from the Espinasse report.18

 

6.1 Reconciliation of Stilk v Myrick and Williams v Roffey

It would seem that Williams v Roffey overruled Stilk v Myrick, but the court emphasized that Stilk still remains good law and distinguished Williams v Roffey. Glidwell LJ said that Williams v Roffey does not contravene the principles from Stilk, but that it “refines and limits” the application of them. However, it is not wholly clear from the judgment on what basis the court arrived at this conclusion. The judges argued that the rigid approach to consideration in Stilk was only a product of the special conditions of the seafare in the 18th century, and that it was too harsh to exist without changes in the modern day. However, the two cases are very similar. Myrick also obtained practical benefit because the sailors continued performance of their contract. Furthermore, Williams v Roffey was later applied in an employment case19 where it was held that when an employee”s wage is increased, sufficient consideration for the increase is the fact that the employee continues his or her work and does not try to bargain for more money.20 Is this not exactly the same situation as in Stilk?

Even if the court was so resolute that Stilk has not been overruled, it seems difficult to defend this idea for much longer. The conclusion could be drawn that the only principle that has survived the attack of Williams v Roffey is that consideration is still required when modifying a contract, while Stilk has been overruled as to what counts as fresh consideration.21

6.2 Application in day-to-day business

It is without a doubt that “practical benefit” is now a recognized category that can be used in practice to establish consideration. Lawyers arguing enforcement of promises for extra payment when the consideration is of doubtful value should avail themselves of “practical benefit” and argue that effect should be given to “commercial reality.” Furthermore, lawyers should argue that it is in the interest of the parties to reach a viable solution that is acceptable to everyone. It is, after all, in the public interest to bargain one”s way out of a stalemate rather than end up in a costly litigation process.

On the other hand, it has become more difficult for the opposing party to attack such contractual modifications because it is no longer so simple to plead lack of consideration where some sort of benefit can be found. It should be argued that there is no legal or practical benefit, and therefore no consideration. The security of contracts should be emphasized – people should get what they bargain for and not be pushed to pay more if difficulties arise. Any sign of duress makes such modification unenforceable. Therefore, one should always look at the process of renegotiation. Simply, was there any sign of improper pressure from the party who was in the stronger contractual position? If so, economic duress should be pleaded as a vitiating factor to the promise.

Williams v Roffey has since been applied in two cases,22 both dealing with renegotiation of commercial contracts. In each case it was held that consideration lay in the “practical benefit” that one party obtained because the other party did not breach the contract and continued its performance.23

 

7. Conclusion: What is the future of consideration?

A new liberal approach has been set. Courts are now more willing to find consideration just to give effect to what they perceive as the actual intent of the parties. This tolerant attitude is counter-balanced by the use of duress as the tool to limit bargains that have been achieved by improper means. The issue is whether this situation is wholly satisfactory. Courts have not been clear enough about the future application of this new approach, and it is evident that the doctrine of consideration in this area has been plunged into confusion.

These reflections might lead to a more revolutionary interpretation of Williams v Roffey. Is there really a need for consideration when varying a contract? American law, for example, does not require it.24 Maybe it is finally time to stop being too afraid of changes and to move ahead. After all, is this not the real unexpressed meaning of Williams v Roffey? It seems that law would become more efficient without the formalistic burden of consideration when modifying a contract.

Reflections about contractual modifications might logically lead us even further. Is consideration necessary at all? It appears that consideration as a principle is still adhered to, but this effort has become somewhat forced. The civil law system can do well without consideration. There exists an increasing hostility towards the old doctrine. It has become more of a technical obstacle than a useful and essential tool. Maybe the modern law should finally get rid of this ancient principle and replace it with more effective doctrines.

Were the judges too afraid to explicitly admit that Williams v Roffey might be the beginning of the end of consideration?

Tereza Šimanovská is a second-year law student at the Faculty of Law, Charles University in Prague. She has spent one year in London, where she studied at the Faculty of Law at the University of Westminster.

 

 

 

Bibliography


Atiyah P S, Essays on Contract, 1st Edition, Reprinted (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2001)


Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005)


McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005)


Noble M, For Your Consideration, November 8 1991, New Law Journal, Butterworth &Co (Publishers) Ltd


Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005)


Treitel G, Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2002)

 

 

...................

1 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 85

2 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp147

3 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 96

4 Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Camp 317 and 6 Esp 129

5 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 95

6 Ibid

7 Ibid pp 358

8 Nevertheless, there is no evidence that the sailors in Stilk v Myrick actually used any pressure to get the extra money. On the contract, it was Myrick himself who promised the increase of wages because he needed to get the ship home. Thus, whilst no actual duress was proved in this, the decision aimed to pre-emptively prevent such situations occurring in the future.

9 For example Atlas Express v Kafco [1989] QB 833

10 Ward v Byham [1956] 1 WLR 496

11 However, here Lord Denning was concerned with a pre-existing duty deriving from public law, not a duty owed under a contract.

12 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp 145

13 Prof Treitel as cited in McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 86

14 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

15 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 99

16 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

17 However, a distinction should be made between threats of breach of contract that amount to economic duress and behaviour that only amounts to acceptable commercial pressure. It should be highlighted that at the moment the law is not very clear about where the exact borderline lays. It seems that not all threats of breach of contract are automatically illegal.

18 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 100

19 Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications [1993] IRLR 383

20 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

21 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp153

22 Anangel Atlas Compania Naviera SA v Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co Ltd (no 2) [1990] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 526; Simon Container Machinery Ltd v Emba Machinery AB [1998] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 429

23 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

24 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 102.

 
< Pűedch.   Další >