Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/php-tmp/upload) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 348

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361
flagyl mutuabile use of clomid tablet clomid changing period strattera for ms fatigue prednisone dosage for respiratory does prednisone cause chest pains switching from rimadyl to prednisone accutane cause lymphoma discontinue propecia metformin effects in pregnancy lexapro heat exhaustion zoloft side effects difficulty swallowing not diabetic metformin can you take accutane and wellbutrin together phenergan oxycodone interaction how long can i use clomid how long to feel effects of viagra where to buy chinese viagra what happens if you drink whilst taking doxycycline taking synthroid and getting pregnant viagra and skin rash does lexapro cause weight loss 50 mg clomid success stories hydrocortisone to prednisone taper clomid pregnancy test negative flagyl to treat pancreatitis drugs not to take with cipro how long does it take metformin to work for pregnant cialis daily bestellen rosacea doxycycline hyclate prednisone treatment for neuropathy does prednisone make you grouchy accutane day 31 buy cialis online generic sleepy after taking clomid what time of day do you take accutane kamagra viagra jelly uk doxycycline side nausea doxycycline hyclate cream ciprofloxacin for breast infection levitra tablets used for lymphoma in cats and prednisone incomplete miscarriage cytotec flagyl and topamax prednisolone dosing guidelines cymbalta interaction with lisinopril cost of zoloft generic does clomid make you ovulate more than one a month compare cialis and levitra what does prednisone do to a diabetes can zoloft cause anhedonia hydrochlorothiazide and sulfa drugs cialis daily stopped working metformin causes anxiety is there a generic estrace zoloft fast heartbeat red bull mas viagra cialis sri lanka what happens when u drink alcohol with flagyl how long does kamagra take to work should you take lasix at night prednisone make dogs hungry tempe viagra spray which is good viagra or cialis does cialis increase your heart rate doxycycline what are they used for therapeutic classification of ventolin better viagra or cialis diflucan tablets used for doxycycline 100mg for humans zoloft 150 mg for anxiety flu vaccine prednisolone can you take viagra lisinopril diflucan pregnancy safety side effects of drug prednisone effectiveness of generic synthroid lithium and zoloft combination target travel viagra lexapro and test anxiety cialis and viagra sales how long do zithromax stay in your system can i have one beer while taking flagyl generic levitra buy eating soy with synthroid doxycycline valtrex zoloft vs prozac vs lexapro natures viagra herb tick prophylaxis doxycycline lisinopril and thrombocytopenia how long does it take flagyl to start working for c diff does everyone get moon face from prednisone viagra nursing considerations calcium and cipro clomid and testing for ovulation viagra contact information shooting pains clomid doxycycline and seroquel ciprofloxacin class of drugs restoril and lexapro can you take promethazine with doxycycline stopped taking cipro ovarian cysts while on clomid doxycycline 100mg pictures ciprofloxacin drowsy cipro to treat travelers diarrhea accutane side effects blood in urine mild acne accutane results can you take ciprofloxacin and hydrocodone interaction between prednisone and aspirin ampicillin iv dose for infants flagyl reaction in dogs doxycycline for canker sores metformin and clomid not working metformin coq10 compare prednisolone to prednisone does cipro deplete magnesium what medications can you not take with metformin can lexapro cause kidney disease will zoloft make you feel high viagra movie comedy ampicillin urine color how long does cialis last forum cheap zoloft online arrow lisinopril 5 is prednisone bad on the liver oral prednisone for allergies taking lexapro and levothyroxine is it ok to take melatonin with synthroid viagra with wellbutrin can i take 1 2 cialis cialis and high blood pressure medication zoloft took months to work lexapro cipro interaction cd 11 on clomid female viagra works ciprofloxacin antibiotics for bacterial infection headache after stopping synthroid flagyl contre infection urinaire is viagra considered a controlled substance 20 mm follicle on clomid can i take prednisone with celebrex boots viagra pgd amoxicillin or cephalexin for strep throat taking buspar and ativan together effects of prednisone long term use zithromax miscarriage viagra commercial with horses music cephalexin 500mg photo metformin first used lexapro dosing for depression prednisone without prescriptions viagra is contraindicated with what medications bactrim lexapro interaction my boyfriend viagra accutane and retin a together can you mix wine and prednisone kamagra rx does old viagra lose its potency how to relieve nausea from metformin can you take lexapro with zyprexa seroquel zithromax tachycardia prednisone withdrawal can you buy viagra over the counter at cvs phenergan for sandfly bites kamagra contact difference between lexapro and luvox trt hcg clomid viagra trazodone interaction can clomid be taken anytime of the day does doxycycline work for bacterial infections metformin in heart failure zoloft breakthrough anxiety how long can it take to get pregnant on clomid is valtrex the same as acyclovir how long for zoloft to clear your system will flagyl treat trichomoniasis doxycycline hyclate horse how many days after clomid does ovulation treatment for viagra overdose is viagra good for prostate cialis permanent blindness how to get prescription for metformin doxycycline sexually transmitted how take viagra work better trichomoniasis treatment doxycycline viagra cialis or levitra which is better cutting down lisinopril what does accutane do to sebaceous glands doxycycline for bacterial vag cipro certificate of founding statement are losartan and lisinopril the same can you mix levitra and cialis zithromax 500 t pak prednisone to stop migraines did you lose weight after going off zoloft diflucan 50 mg notice clomid in nz mixing lisinopril and alcohol femara better than clomid diflucan canine dosage is prednisone used to treat asthma prednisone feline arthritis cialis preis apotheke ciprofloxacin vs alcohol ciprofloxacin chocolate losartan potassium and viagra 100mg of zoloft during pregnancy what does doxycycline do for the body transitioning from lexapro to celexa headache cialis remedy stopping lexapro while pregnant ventolin or proair where can i get cytotec in the uk reviews lexapro anxiety zoloft nausea in the morning strattera how long does it take to work can missing a dose of metformin make you sick prednisone effect on hair growth propecia arthritis cialis strategy how soon does metformin work for weight loss post accutane scar treatment what is cephalexin 500mg capsules cytotec at 4 weeks should clomid be taken before or after food accutane timeframe order provigil canada accutane confidence lasix iv drug will clomid cause constipation clomid 50 mg cp b 5 symptoms of prednisone withdrawal in dogs does prednisone increase performance generic phenergan vc with codeine strep throat treatment flagyl i want to stop taking lisinopril what is the strongest dose of valtrex pinworms treatment vermox can i take panadol with flagyl cipro and strep throat bystolic drug interactions lexapro pcos and clomid 100mg success stories lexapro and low t prednisone 10mg dogs lowest viagra prices will lexapro raise blood sugar flagyl rash treatment do i need to eat when i take cipro estrace cream and coumadin viagra online purchase canada cephalexin 250 mg msds cialis 2 tablet fiyatı how much phenergan can i give my 2 year old zoloft and 12 year old lexapro celexa differences prednisone circulation what's after clomid uk can clomid be purchased online taking zoloft and codeine viagra online purchase uk ideal cialis dosage does strattera make you gain or lose weight where to get viagra in dhaka zoloft candida accutane protein in urine cipro news 2013 cephalexin and acidophilus phenergan purpose avkare inc metformin success rates with clomid and iui vitex agnus castus and metformin cephalexin interactions with metformin how many guys take propecia cymbalta and zoloft contraindications how to ask my doctor for cialis doxycycline for dry cough health one levitra zithromax ok take while pregnant buspar causing erectile dysfunction cialis zyrtec interaction pediatric dosage of prednisone is viagra safe for a 16 year old losartan potassium vs losartan hydrochlorothiazide us pharmacy prices for cialis does clomid have birth defects is it illegal to cross viagra from mexico can you take two 25 mg viagra how long does it take for prednisone to work on rash ciprofloxacin urinary tract infection dosage zithromax tick bite does zoloft mess with your metabolism hotel a cipro all inclusive does accutane give headaches nolvadex for sale in canada maximum metformin dose daily ventolin drug class clomid sore nipples provigil used for weight loss arimidex and clomid for pct synthroid focus home remedies instead of viagra is zoloft approved for anxiety cephalexin and gluten is diflucan taken orally what is metformin pregnancy zoloft wellbutrin lamictal 20 mg cialis side effects do they sell cytotec over the counter ibuprofen 600 and ciprofloxacin metformin ct scan contrast dye can i take lexapro and viibryd together prednisolone male fertility can i take zyrtec and zoloft together does prednisone give you high blood pressure how to take ciprofloxacin hydrochloride 500 mg can i take antibiotics while on clomid where to purchase viagra in delhi liquid viagra cialis clomid tablets for twins horizon prednisone side effects cialis viagra doctor prescribed strattera depression coming off lexapro is viagra help premature ejaculation taking metformin without having diabetes does zoloft cause high blood sugar can you take cipro and valtrex together iui success stories with clomid and ovidrel cytotec dose prior to iud insertion retail cost for synthroid maximum daily dose provigil where can i buy cytotec pills in the philippines can you work out on clomid pharmacokinetics cephalexin metformin and melatonin nolvadex with testosterone enanthate can cipro be used for an ear infection cialis saudi arabia success stories with iui and clomid high estradiol levels after clomid accutane in the army common side effects viagra accutane results after 1 week avoiding zoloft weight gain clomid treatment for azoospermia ampicillin flagyl what is the daily dose of valtrex stomach bloating cipro cialis jelly uk diagnosis for lasix cipro otc calcinosis cutis prednisone zoloft hair pulling lisinopril and diclofenac clomid steroid late af clomid celexa lexapro dosage comparison valtrex uses side effects interactions drugs use of synthroid during pregnancy discharge teaching for cipro accutane and cetaphil how long doxycycline take to work for blepharitis can metformin cause lactation does buspar increase dopamine lexapro news article can i have a tb test while on prednisone propecia vs finasteride generic can synthroid and metformin be taken together doxycycline scratchy throat prednisone induced peripheral neuropathy viagra 100mg blue can you take ginkgo biloba and lexapro can you take prednisone with a blood thinner cipro sore joints buy clomid online from mexico flagyl for aspiration pneumonia cymbalta cialis interaction lexapro in third trimester pregnancy what is the usual dosage of lasix asthma cold prednisone nolvadex and strength what happens if i quit zoloft cold turkey how effective is ciprofloxacin for chlamydia accidentally took 2 propecia diazepam buspar cialis dapoxetine 80mg accutane eye color change can you take claritin d with accutane clomid days 1 5 pregnant 40 mg strattera vs adderall prednisone prednisolone feline buy cialis italy upping dosage of lexapro ciprofloxacin used for kidney infection what are the ingredients in strattera does taking half viagra work how to take viagra tablets levitra cialis viagra comparison prednisone effects on insulin can you take viagra with celexa what works better viagra or levitra or cialis antabuse injection australia prednisone and benadryl taken together levitra vs cialis and viagra when to take valtrex daily acne ejaculation accutane prednisone dosage for severe allergic reaction side effects of prednisone blood pressure is lisinopril a potassium sparing drug can you take ibuprofen while on cipro zithromax and imodium metformin monitoring labs using abilify with zoloft can valtrex cause infertility what to expect with synthroid clomid dosage every month doxycycline and teeth whitening lisinopril spirig 20 doxycycline to treat dog ear infection how to get rid of dry skin on accutane cialis online 123 cipro side effects chest pain me tome 6 cytotec how to stop hair thinning from accutane can you give a dog benadryl with prednisone what can i take to help me sleep while on prednisone what is the side effect of doxycycline capsule high estrogen levels on clomid can accutane cause knee pain phenergan with codeine pediatric dose lexapro celexa conversion can i take buspar with celexa prednisone causing hyperactivity natural viagra pomegranate forum where to buy viagra online dose of phenergan in infants how to withdraw from lexapro 10 mg buy viagra in south africa online amoxil bd suspensao prednisone cause hair loss in dogs advil and lexapro interaction will i ovulate on 100mg clomid strattera nlm is tretinoin cream the same as accutane international cialis weight gain with metformin for pcos propecia reviews amazon doubling synthroid dose lasix dose in blood transfusion kamagra jelly facts how to manage weight gain from prednisone how long does cytotec take to terminate pregnancy viagra cost at walmart pharmacy what is the cost for lexapro diflucan and mirena effectiveness ciprofloxacin taste loss can lisinopril increased potassium levels viagra solubility viagra 25 mg is enough why would i lose weight on prednisone metformin and ammonia what dose of doxycycline for sinus infection prednisone allergy alternative diflucan treatment for chlamydia all i need to know about zoloft has anyone tried clomid prednisone folic acid prednisone withdrawal and adrenal gland diflucan for nail infection dose of amoxil for dogs taking clomid for three months buspar side effects nervousness image of prednisone lisinopril ww 270 can you take xanax with diflucan how to take glipizide and metformin prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension for dogs can i take 2 year old doxycycline flagyl suspension concentration zoloft side effects overdose clomid while pregnant birth defects pharmacy prices for strattera prednisolone sodium phosphate solubility ph ovulation sous clomid ventolin gotas argentina does lexapro stop blushing how do you know when you need viagra synthroid and celebrex valtrex daily suppressive prednisone and panic attacks can i use monistat with flagyl whey protein powder and metformin therapeutic category of viagra how often to take ventolin inhaler will doxycycline treat mouth infection can valtrex and azithromycin be taken together when does clomid expire synthroid contraindications herbs viagra kidney damage can alcohol make zoloft not work
 
Common Law Review
 
Domů arrow Články arrow Issue 8 - Contract Law arrow 13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration
13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration PDF Tisk E-mail

When values change

Re-negotiating Consideration

Tereza Šimanovská

 

1. Introduction

Throughout history, a number of common law doctrines have developed to determine whether a contract was validly concluded and whether it is enforceable in law. One such doctrine is the need for a contract to be supported by consideration.

The basic idea behind the doctrine of consideration is reciprocity – i.e. a person should not be allowed to enforce another”s promise unless he or she has given or promised to give something in exchange for that promise.1 In essence, consideration is the “value” or “price” that one contributes towards a bargain.

Consideration must also be provided when modifying a contract. This rule of the orthodox doctrine of consideration has recently undergone a very significant change and it may have cast doubt on the future of consideration itself. The issue concerns the nature of consideration upon the variation or re-negotiation of a contract and, more specifically, when one party is promised additional money to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation.

 

2. Re-negotiation of a contract – Need for fresh consideration

Until recently it was well-established that performance of a pre-existing contractual duty owed to the other contractual party could not amount to good consideration. In plain words, when someone merely performs what he was already bound to do, such performance is not good consideration to enforce a promise of extra money. He did not provide anything additional – he did not provide any consideration for the extra money paid by the other party. It can be said that the promisee does “the same for more”.2

In reality, however, contractual renegotiations are commonplace in the daily commercial practice of almost all industries: whilst performing a previously-concluded contract, circumstances may arise which force the parties to renegotiate their agreement and alter the original price. Indeed, it seems rather unfair to deny the parties such a possibility.

When parties decide to modify a contract they should bear in mind that, just as consideration was necessary to create the original contract, “fresh” consideration is required to effect a valid modification of that original contract. There are two ways to ensure that a promise for extra money is enforceable. Either one party does something “more” than was required by the original agreement or that original agreement is discharged by both parties and a new agreement concluded.3 Traditionally, the courts have been unwilling to imply that an original agreement was “torn up” and a new one concluded – this is a conclusion they are willing to reach only where the evidence clearly supports such a finding. Regardless of how artificial these two ways may appear, if the parties wish to alter the price stipulated in the original contract, they should ensure there is fresh consideration for the promise of such additional money.

3. Traditional doctrine of Stilk v Myrick

This aspect of the consideration doctrine originates from the case of Stilk v Myrick.4 Myrick was a captain on a ship who employed Stilk to work on a Baltic Sea voyage. During the voyage two members of the crew deserted and the master promised that the remaining sailors could share the deserters” wages amongst themselves if they sailed the ship back home. Upon arrival at the dock, the master refused to honour that promise and Stilk sued for the sum. His claim failed.

When explaining the grounds upon which the judgment was decided, it must be emphasised that this case was published in two separate law reports, both of which offered different ratios. Nevertheless, Campbell”s report has generally been considered correct, and its ratio accepted as the precedent governing this area of law.5 The main reason it gives for the failure of Stilk”s claim is that the agreement lacked consideration. The sailors were not entitled to the additional payment because they merely did what they were obliged to do by virtue of their original contract. They provided no new consideration for the captain”s promise of extra money.

The other source, the Espinasse report, says that the main reason for the result was public policy. It was undesirable that it should be open to the sailors in the future to exercise improper pressure on their master to increase their wages. This report makes no reference to the fact that lack of consideration would bar the claim, and instead focuses on the need to avoid what would in modern law be referred to as economic duress.6 Economic duress exists when one party illegitimately abuses his or her superior economic power to coerce the other party into agreeing to a particular set of terms.7 A contract entered into under economic duress is voidable and may be set aside by the court.8

In any case, it has always been the first report that was applied. The rule about the existing duty laid by the Campbell report was followed many times afterwards,9 but has always been somewhat controversial. It simply does not seem fair that a party can breach his or her promise and get away with it, even if the other party acted upon that promise in good faith.

There have been some voices criticising this rule. For example, Lord Denning tried to escape it because it can often lead to unfair results. He stated in Ward v Byham10 that “a promise to perform an existing duty,11 or the performance of it, should be regarded as good consideration, because it is a benefit to the person to whom it is given.” The promisor in fact benefited from the situation – he obtained “factual benefit”.12

Nevertheless, most of the judiciary were not willing to come to such radical conclusions. In Ward v Byham the remaining judges expressly refused Lord Denning”s revolutionary proposition. Throughout history, rather than going against the traditional doctrine, courts were often ready to find consideration even where one could say that there was none to be found. Sometimes it is said that courts “invented consideration” to abide by the orthodox doctrine.13

4. Revolution against the old approach: No legal benefit necessary

The controversial case of Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd.14 might be labelled as falling into this category. This decision has dramatically changed the traditional doctrine regarding pre-existing contractual duty and has cast great uncertainty over the future development of consideration in this area.

 

4.1 Williams v Roffey

The Roffey Brothers were builders who contracted with a housing association to refurbish a block of 27 flats. They sub-contracted the carpentry work to Williams for £20,000. Williams got into financial difficulties and it was apparent that he might not be able to complete the work on time. It was mainly because Wiliams had underpriced his contract. The second reason was deficiency in William”s supervision of his workers. Roffey Bros. became worried that they would be liable under a penalty clause in their main contract and promised Williams an additional sum of £10,300. This was to be paid at the rate of £575 per flat on completion. Williams finished eight more flats but only received £1,500. Williams ultimately sued Roffey Bros. for the remaining sum.

The main issue before the Court of Appeals was whether Williams provided consideration for the additional £10,300 promised by Roffey Bros. The court held that the agreement to pay the extra money was enforceable. This came as a great surprise. It defied the traditional rule set out in Stilk v Myrick. What was the consideration provided by Williams? He only did the work that he was bound to do by his original agreement – he only performed a duty already owed to Roffey.

 

4.2 New form of consideration: Practical benefit

In Williams v. Roffey, the court found valid consideration in the practical benefit that Roffey obtained by his agreement with Williams. So far the practical/factual benefit (Denning) has been refused as good consideration. The argument has always been that consideration must be something of value in the eyes of law – something that provides or brings about a legal benefit.

What was this practical benefit? It consisted of a number of factors. The court held that it was the fact that Williams continued his work and did not breach the sub-contract. Therefore, Roffey avoided the trouble of looking for somebody else to complete the work. Furthermore, Roffey avoided the penalty payment for the delay under the main contract. Also, by directing the claimant to complete one flat at a time, the defendant was able to organize their work with other subcontractors in a more efficient manner. It is clear that the logic of “factual benefit” earlier argued by Lord Denning was applied here. Even though there was no legal benefit to Roffey, the contractual modification, in fact, benefited Roffey.

It is questionable whether this reasoning about “practical benefits” is persuasive enough to disregard the need for a legal benefit and change this rule in such a dramatic way. When looking at each of the “practical benefits”, one realizes that they do not consist of anything additional. Roffey would have received all of these benefits under the original contract, even if it were not modified. In fact, all of these new “advantages” were the very reason why they concluded the original contract. Williams was hired as the subcontractor to do the work. Therefore, the main purpose here was not to look for anyone else to do the job. Similarly, the fact that Roffey did not have to pay the penalty because the plaintiff continued the work was the very reason that a subcontractor would have been hired initially. The question is: how can this count as a fresh consideration? Was this not yet another “invented consideration” by the courts?

 

4.3 Practical benefit justified by commercial reality

On the other hand, it can be argued that this pragmatic decision finally concedes what can be called “commercial reality”. After all, it is a common practice in the building industry for the main contractor to increase sub-contractors” payments if the parties see that the price is too low. As the counsel for the plaintiff argued, “It would be unfortunate if English law deprived an acceptable commercial practice, which both parties regard as beneficial, of legal effect.” Thus, the court should look at the situation as it stands and acknowledge what in fact is beneficial for the parties, as opposed to seeking a theoretical “legal benefit”. The preference should be given to what the actual intention of the parties was when renegotiating the contract, so that their intended agreement is given effect. Would it not be unfair to negate their clear arrangement that was entered into voluntarily? Russel LJ said: “Consideration there must be but courts should be more ready to find its existence as to reflect the intention of the parties.”

Obviously, there are two competing principles to be weighed regarding the doctrine of consideration. It can be said that modifications are in the public interest and both parties should be encouraged to bargain their way out of an unanticipated difficulty. On the other hand, it is also desirable to hold parties to the contractual terms of their bargain.15 Clearly, there are pros and cons to each of the two conflicting interests.

 

5. Potential escape from a contract as a value?

Another issue should be contemplated in this area. It was said that Williams suffered a detriment by continuing the work and not breaching the contract. His counsel argued “he (Williams) might have been better off by breaking the contract, getting higher paid work elsewhere and paying such damages as the contractor can recover against him”.16 Can this constitute good consideration? Can this be anything of value in the eyes of law? This proposition seems to undermine the sanctity of contracts. It is an old principle of law that people should be held to their bargains – Pacta sunt servanda. Therefore, the legal practice should promote this principle and not acknowledge that a threatened breach of contract is a viable basis for finding consideration. Such reasoning does not seem correct as a part of legal practice.

Threatening with breach of contract to increase the agreed price is indeed walking on thin ice. As mentioned above, agreements that are achieved by illegitimate pressure exercised by the party with greater economic power can be set aside on the grounds of economic duress.17 It was very important that in Williams v Roffey duress was not established on the facts of the case. The main reason that the judgment was given for Williams was almost certainly because duress was not involved. Roffey called for the meeting because it was obvious that the work would not be finished as planned. Williams did not explicitly threaten with breach of contract.

 

6. Consequences of the new approach to consideration

Undoubtedly, Williams v Roffey significantly widened the scope of the doctrine of consideration. Promises to perform existing duties can now be good consideration when they lead to practical benefit. As the doctrine of duress is a relatively new concept (first acknowledged in 1976), in the past, courts used consideration in situations that would nowadays be judged in terms of duress. In situations like those in Stilk v Myrick, the judge could not avail himself of economic duress and instead used lack of consideration as the reason for his judgment. Thus, a case like Stilk would be decided differently today. Most likely, it would be brought as a duress case and not necessarily fail for lack of consideration. It could be stated that the Court of Appeals followed the reasoning from the Espinasse report.18

 

6.1 Reconciliation of Stilk v Myrick and Williams v Roffey

It would seem that Williams v Roffey overruled Stilk v Myrick, but the court emphasized that Stilk still remains good law and distinguished Williams v Roffey. Glidwell LJ said that Williams v Roffey does not contravene the principles from Stilk, but that it “refines and limits” the application of them. However, it is not wholly clear from the judgment on what basis the court arrived at this conclusion. The judges argued that the rigid approach to consideration in Stilk was only a product of the special conditions of the seafare in the 18th century, and that it was too harsh to exist without changes in the modern day. However, the two cases are very similar. Myrick also obtained practical benefit because the sailors continued performance of their contract. Furthermore, Williams v Roffey was later applied in an employment case19 where it was held that when an employee”s wage is increased, sufficient consideration for the increase is the fact that the employee continues his or her work and does not try to bargain for more money.20 Is this not exactly the same situation as in Stilk?

Even if the court was so resolute that Stilk has not been overruled, it seems difficult to defend this idea for much longer. The conclusion could be drawn that the only principle that has survived the attack of Williams v Roffey is that consideration is still required when modifying a contract, while Stilk has been overruled as to what counts as fresh consideration.21

6.2 Application in day-to-day business

It is without a doubt that “practical benefit” is now a recognized category that can be used in practice to establish consideration. Lawyers arguing enforcement of promises for extra payment when the consideration is of doubtful value should avail themselves of “practical benefit” and argue that effect should be given to “commercial reality.” Furthermore, lawyers should argue that it is in the interest of the parties to reach a viable solution that is acceptable to everyone. It is, after all, in the public interest to bargain one”s way out of a stalemate rather than end up in a costly litigation process.

On the other hand, it has become more difficult for the opposing party to attack such contractual modifications because it is no longer so simple to plead lack of consideration where some sort of benefit can be found. It should be argued that there is no legal or practical benefit, and therefore no consideration. The security of contracts should be emphasized – people should get what they bargain for and not be pushed to pay more if difficulties arise. Any sign of duress makes such modification unenforceable. Therefore, one should always look at the process of renegotiation. Simply, was there any sign of improper pressure from the party who was in the stronger contractual position? If so, economic duress should be pleaded as a vitiating factor to the promise.

Williams v Roffey has since been applied in two cases,22 both dealing with renegotiation of commercial contracts. In each case it was held that consideration lay in the “practical benefit” that one party obtained because the other party did not breach the contract and continued its performance.23

 

7. Conclusion: What is the future of consideration?

A new liberal approach has been set. Courts are now more willing to find consideration just to give effect to what they perceive as the actual intent of the parties. This tolerant attitude is counter-balanced by the use of duress as the tool to limit bargains that have been achieved by improper means. The issue is whether this situation is wholly satisfactory. Courts have not been clear enough about the future application of this new approach, and it is evident that the doctrine of consideration in this area has been plunged into confusion.

These reflections might lead to a more revolutionary interpretation of Williams v Roffey. Is there really a need for consideration when varying a contract? American law, for example, does not require it.24 Maybe it is finally time to stop being too afraid of changes and to move ahead. After all, is this not the real unexpressed meaning of Williams v Roffey? It seems that law would become more efficient without the formalistic burden of consideration when modifying a contract.

Reflections about contractual modifications might logically lead us even further. Is consideration necessary at all? It appears that consideration as a principle is still adhered to, but this effort has become somewhat forced. The civil law system can do well without consideration. There exists an increasing hostility towards the old doctrine. It has become more of a technical obstacle than a useful and essential tool. Maybe the modern law should finally get rid of this ancient principle and replace it with more effective doctrines.

Were the judges too afraid to explicitly admit that Williams v Roffey might be the beginning of the end of consideration?

Tereza Šimanovská is a second-year law student at the Faculty of Law, Charles University in Prague. She has spent one year in London, where she studied at the Faculty of Law at the University of Westminster.

 

 

 

Bibliography


Atiyah P S, Essays on Contract, 1st Edition, Reprinted (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2001)


Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005)


McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005)


Noble M, For Your Consideration, November 8 1991, New Law Journal, Butterworth &Co (Publishers) Ltd


Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005)


Treitel G, Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2002)

 

 

...................

1 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 85

2 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp147

3 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 96

4 Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Camp 317 and 6 Esp 129

5 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 95

6 Ibid

7 Ibid pp 358

8 Nevertheless, there is no evidence that the sailors in Stilk v Myrick actually used any pressure to get the extra money. On the contract, it was Myrick himself who promised the increase of wages because he needed to get the ship home. Thus, whilst no actual duress was proved in this, the decision aimed to pre-emptively prevent such situations occurring in the future.

9 For example Atlas Express v Kafco [1989] QB 833

10 Ward v Byham [1956] 1 WLR 496

11 However, here Lord Denning was concerned with a pre-existing duty deriving from public law, not a duty owed under a contract.

12 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp 145

13 Prof Treitel as cited in McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 86

14 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

15 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 99

16 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

17 However, a distinction should be made between threats of breach of contract that amount to economic duress and behaviour that only amounts to acceptable commercial pressure. It should be highlighted that at the moment the law is not very clear about where the exact borderline lays. It seems that not all threats of breach of contract are automatically illegal.

18 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 100

19 Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications [1993] IRLR 383

20 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

21 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp153

22 Anangel Atlas Compania Naviera SA v Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co Ltd (no 2) [1990] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 526; Simon Container Machinery Ltd v Emba Machinery AB [1998] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 429

23 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

24 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 102.

 
< Předch.   Další >