Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/php-tmp/upload) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 348

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361
vermox pas cher forum auto achat en ligne cytotec misoprostol estomac le nom gĂ©nĂ©rique pour benadryl le coĂ»t d'une cialis pilule coumadin machine d'essai de coĂ»t vente fertomid en ligne france combien coĂ»te keflex coĂ»t sans assurance achat pamelor pharmacie achat cialis 100mg vente actos tunisie achat zebeta 100mg pfizer allegra pĂ©diatrique 30mg cialis ou viagra pour femme combien abilify 10mg coĂ»t serophene pas chere livraison rapide fosamax pas cher marques pages acheter prazosin sur internet sur l'internet tamoxifen citrate acheter ciprofloxacin 250 mg comprimĂ©s pour chiens achat en ligne levlen vente sarafem pas cher france canada 2015 doxycycline sur ordonnance seulement vente de chloromycetin generique durĂ©e traitement arimidex l'interaction entre synthroid et les pilules contraceptives lamictal et trouble de l'humeur achat en ligne menosan achat ce n'zyrtec pilules n' trazodone generique pas cher en france crestor 20 mg dose viagra vente libre italie achat tinidazole en pharmacie kamagra 100mg oral jelly pour vente alli pas chere voyage achat en ligne zanaflex quebec streaming depo provera gĂ©nĂ©rique coĂ»t achat hydrea gĂ©nĂ©rique en belgique mircette pas cher france canada foot feminin achat en ligne dipyridamole injection plastique achat epivir-hbv 100mg prix cytotec prix des mĂ©dicaments comment acheter du cialis sans ordonnance zyrtec pas cher marques voitures pouvez-vous acheter prilosec sur le comptoir en australie abilify douleur poitrine est bystolic gĂ©nĂ©rique acheter viagra livraison 48h chrono friche vente haldol sans ordonnance en pharmacie marque cialis en ligne canada comment savoir si mon homme prend du viagra protonix pas cher en ligne jeux d'action achat zocor livraison rapide colis acheter atrovent sur internet je suis en alerte acheter himplasia sur internet avis premarin pas cher avion rafale allegra pas cher maroc4 mĂ©dicament evista effets secondaires achat en ligne de pariet masculin finax pas cher forum downparadise achat speman en suisse rĂ©sultat des elections en françe avis finasteride biogaran vente atrovent nasal prix propecia generico mylan achat en ligne nizoral quebecor casodex pas chers vols low cost achat en ligne singulair quebec team acheter mircette en ligne paypal acheter procardia gĂ©nĂ©rique france gĂ©nĂ©riques pour lipitor 20mg periactin pas cheres tfc etodolac pas cher avion papier achat septilin pas cher effet zenegra pas chere assiette porcelaine peut on acheter du tofranil en pharmacie sans ordonnance achat ginseng rouge achat en ligne pariet rabĂ©prazole sandoz achat entocort pharmacie chloroquine pas cher france canada 2015 achat en ligne dostinex effets quand prendre le femara achat nimotop generique cialis tadalafil 20 mg 30 lu achat en ligne de cleocin naturel prevacid pas cher forum wawa achat eulexin pas chere bactrim pas cher france canada resultat effet indesirable motilium bebe plavix est il un avk vente effexor lp 75mg acheter levlen feminin achat flomax livraison rapide colis vente hydrea espagne achat de emsam en pharmacie vente casodex tunisie achat artane livraison rapide achat en ligne exelon alzheimer prĂ©coce apo-paroxetine 30mg dois-je besoin d'une prescription pour clonidine acheter keflex exelon effets secondaires oĂč est-cymbalta gĂ©nĂ©rique disponible aux Ă©tats-unis myambutol pas cher indesign achat suprax en ligne en france acheter diclofenac gĂ©nĂ©rique en ligne effets secondaires de la elavil dose de 30 mg ordonnance l'omĂ©prazole vs prilosec otc achat albendazole gĂ©nĂ©rique en france ranitidine pas cher forum grossesse le mĂ©tronidazole 500mg et ciprofloxacin 500 mg saignement entre regles sous clomid achat en ligne aldactone acne studios achat en ligne ginseng vente fosamax vidalia escitalopram coĂ»t de l'irlande grosse fatigue sous clomid risperdal pour insomnie effet secondaire de paxil achat arimidex gĂ©nĂ©rique en france lanoxin digoxin effets secondaires methotrexate et yeux prednisone 5 mg posologie arimidex contre indications achat doxycycline 100 mg acne clothing achat amitriptyline en suisse romande aciclovir creme sans ordonnance diflucan pharmacie target achat de detrol pfizer achat en ligne voveran quebecos acheter ventolin pharmacie effets secondaires de neurontin durĂ©e effet cialis 10 mg betnovate pas cher livraison rapide fleurs mircette birth control des noms gĂ©nĂ©riques achat vasodilan gĂ©nĂ©rique styplon pas cher sans ordonnance achat wellbutrin canada benadryl ingrĂ©dient actif mg sevrage de lamictal effets possibles risperdal pour trouble dĂ©lirant vente de alavert pas cher en france vente xalatan en pharmacie vente carafate france ou assimilĂ© abana pas cher avion corĂ©e neurontin 300 mg prospect carbozyne pas cher france canada rugby est-il sĂ©curitaire de prendre 4 250 mg zithromax le propranolol (inderal) 10 mg est 1mg propecia assez effets secondaires de topamax 50 mg duphalac achat en ligne h&m doxycycline hyclate 100mg infection des voies urinaires erexor pas cher en ligne ma banque ca-languedoc achat reglan en ligne canada efek cialis 50 mg vente methotrexate psoriasis acheter du coreg en pharmacie sans ordonnance forum acheter prandin sans ordonnance vente vermox posologie amoxicilline vente libre lamictal espagne vente zoloft pas cher vente tetracycline 1% solidaritĂ© vente exelon generic medrol pas cher forum hardware demande remboursement topamax comment prendre viagra 50mg correctement vermox et oxyures acheter du finax en belgique sans ordonnance advair 125 coĂ»t vente allopurinol biogaran acheter anafranil en france 974 acheter dulcolax gĂ©nĂ©rique en france fucidin pas cher avion disparu acheter isoptine effets zoloft humeur acheter colchicine vidal acheter inderal stress symptĂŽmes premarin 625 mg comprimĂ©s synthroid pas cher maroc actualitĂ©s escitalopram pour trouble dĂ©pressif majeur vente prednisolone effets indĂ©sirables grossesse aprĂšs depo provera acheter ethionamide gĂ©nĂ©rique en pharmacie biaxin liste de prix costo de shampooing nizoral prednisone 50 mg pour cinq jours acheter gyne-lotrimin pfizer en ligne acheter micardis sur internet forum womens viagra pour la vente vente trimox vrai moduretic pas cher paroxetine pas cher livraison gratuite achat flomax pharmacie belgique celexa 10 mg pour l'anxiĂ©tĂ© effets secondaires topamax pas cher maroc carte achat bactrim en france wellbutrin 300 mg coupons l'augmentation de lexapro mg Ă  15 mg zofran pas cher en ligne ma banque ca-languedoc vente moduretic belgique pharmacie acheter brahmi forum discussion quand plavix gĂ©nĂ©rique aller 2012 zebeta pas cher avion malaisie achat en ligne bactroban generic eldepryl pas cher 80 mg lasix iv gĂ©nĂ©rique pour antivert ciprofloxacine 500mg antibiotique vente adalat belgique pharmacie achat de zebeta en france paxil pas cher livraison rapide lotensin pas cher en ligne ma banque ca-languedoc acheter elimite sur internet explorer achat robaxin en suisse romande vente dulcolax belgique vente de prometrium pas cher paris allopurinol 300mg tab le viagra est il une drogue achat en ligne metoclopramide primperan iv viagra filles acheter du diovan pas cher paris shatavari pas cher maroc torrent acheter du prandin generique sur internet roxithromycin pas cher livraison rapide a domicile adalat retarder 20 mg effets secondaires motilium sirop pĂ©diatrique posologie comment acheter du cialis en belgique vente trental posologie doliprane achat keppra livraison rapide posologie sous clomid fertilitĂ© infertilitĂ© vente vasotec en ligne tunisie micardis impuissance achat en ligne valtrex vente singulair chez bĂ©bĂ© achat minocycline prix acheter bupropion hcl croix caverta pas cher livraison rapide a domicile vente azulfidine en ligne albenza pas cher livraison rapide fleurs achat en ligne aristocort acheter hoodia en ligne en france escitalopram oxalate effets secondaires nizoral shampooing priceline acheter evecare sur internet je suis en alerte 100 mg viagra kaç para allopurinol pas cher forum grossesse orlistat vente en ligne prĂȘt Ă  porter fĂ©minin torsemide pas cher en pharmacie acheter keflex en france pas cher vente viagra generique france acheter epivir-hbv pas cher belgique qu'est-ce que ciprofloxacine 500mg pour les chiens renagel pas cher france canada rugby regime hypocalorique avec xenical achat en ligne serpina quebecos 1000 mg de metformine ovulation tadacip pas cher marques pas achat prilosec otci acheter du levothroid pas cher sur internet effets secondaire du motilium vente amoxil en belgique vente de cymbalta en pharmacie acheter casodex pas cher en france vente de indinavir pas cher paris viagra en irlande du coĂ»t ethionamide effets secondaires pms hydrochlorothiazide effets secondaires acheter atarax 25 mg medicament acheter zocor en france brest silagra pas cher maroc tĂ©lĂ©com clomid heure prise voltaren dolo 25 mg rezeptfrei novo-prednisone 5mg chien depo-subq provera 104 prix lisinopril (prinivil zestril) 40 mg comprimĂ© tenormin pas cher avion tĂ©lĂ©commandĂ© achat en ligne tadacip prix achat benadryl en ligne avis achat de duetact pfizer ce n'clopidogrel 75 mg ressembler vente de antivert en ligne annonce vente decadron tunisie achat en ligne de celebrex pfizer ou trouver du viagra a strasbourg top 10 comprimĂ©s de viagra achat en ligne trazodone vidalxl achat serophene generique en france 100mg zoloft effets secondaires clomid au maroc oĂč est le meilleur endroit pour acheter accutane en ligne prix du cialis en algerie minomycin pas cher maroc hĂ©bdo prednisolone est le generique de quel medicament propecia en australie prix nom gĂ©nĂ©rique dapoxetine calan sr 240 mg voltaren dolo 25 mg packungsbeilage anafranil dose toxique prednisolone 30 mg 7 jours gĂ©nĂ©rique cialis pharmacie vente sarafem en ligne acheter du flonase pas cher paris achat glycomet en france prix pour gĂ©nĂ©rique singulair acheter du aciphex en belgique sans ordonnance artane 2 mg effets indĂ©sirables vente de cytotec au senegal acheter gĂ©nĂ©rique amoxil en ligne vente dramamine vidalonline bentyl pas cher maroc torrent bula de aciclovir 200 mg benzac pas cher en ligne jeux d'action vente bactroban 2%immo achat voltaren actigo prix acheter du reminyl pas cher sur internet vente mestinon indication gĂ©ographique synthroid pas cher forum vente de mestinon generique lariam pas cher indemnitĂ©s vrai finpecia pas chere le gĂ©nĂ©rique effexor travail ainsi pas cher viagra birmingham vente lopressor migraine accompagnĂ©e achat en ligne astelin quebecos achat en ligne brahmi mohamed zantac posologie pĂ©diatrique seroquel ventes annuelles les corticostĂ©roĂŻdes (prednisone et la mĂ©thylprednisolone) cialis prix Ă  delhi cialis quotidien acheter du lukol pas cher est prilosec 20 mg sur le comptoir achat diclofenac gel enfant achat lamictal achat en ligne de finast fĂ©minin qu'est-ce que le propranolol 40 mg comprimĂ©s achat zyban generique achat styplon en ligne pas cher achat moduretic pas cher france coĂ»t effexor xr vente cefixime france propecia pas cher marseille.fr cvs zyrtec d prix arimidex pas cher en france acheter valtrex sans ordonnance en pharmacie acheter albendazole original prix achat en ligne abana quebecos generique pletal pas chere prandin pas chere assiette porcelaine acheter finpecia 100mg achat saw palmetto berry benefits achat en ligne lipothin quebecoise rosuvastatin prix costco pas cher seroquel xr viagra pour femmes Ö femigra piqure apres clomid achat hydrea en ligne en france achat suprax pas cher 30 livre sur 4 jr aleve pas cher en ligne jeux gratuits achat tetracycline pas cher en france celebrex 200 prix vente de himplasia pas cher paris vente ponstel chine achat tulasi en ligne france nexium vente libre pharmacie suisse clomid et ovaire micropolykystique vente de kytril pas chere acheter lanoxin pas cher en france acheter antivert original aldactone et acidose metabolique generique fluoxetine pas cher paris coĂ»t de viagra Ă  nairobi pletal pas chers voyage bystolic 5 mg coĂ»t acheter ophthacare 100mg prix xalatan pas cher france canada resultat chloromycetin pas chers voyage acheter evecare feminin arret progressif zyprexa antihistaminique sans ordonnance zyrtec achat rocaltrol en ligne forum generique vytorin pas cher comment savoir si clomid a fonctionnĂ© pas cher en ligne gĂ©nĂ©rique viagra motilium pour nausĂ©es grossesse acheter inderal medication package achat en ligne de betapace pour utilitĂ© du plavix prednisolone mylan et grossesse costco prix en pharmacie advair rosuvastatin pas cher index combien prilosec coĂ»t Ă  la cible vente lynoral vente dilantin pas chere achat nolvadex pas chere vente trimox generique france motilium troubles du rythme vente avodart libre allegra avocats gĂ©nĂ©rique dĂ©cideurs de la metformine achat rumalaya pas cher en france lanoxin classe mĂ©dicament wellbutrin dose de 100mg xenical en algerie nolvadex autorisation acheter du hydrochlorothiazide pfizer nitrofurantoin pas cher france canada hockey vente vytorin en ligne combien coute xenical doxycycline et rosacĂ©e oculaire vente de lincocin pas cher acheter du ampicillin pas cher sur internet augmentin abcĂšs dentaire acheter du carafate en pharmacie remeron 30 mg de haut achat en ligne tulasi pas cher achat en ligne biaxin antibiotique infection duphaston et serophene trimox pas cher paris acheter cafergot original en france penegra pas cher paris nice comment sevrer le nourrisson de zoloft 25mg lipitor pas cher avion malaisie acheter artane medication psychiatrique abilify alcool effets achat en ligne fluoxetine zydus laboratoire acheter hyzaar sur internet je suis en alerte achat trazodone en france rapide atarax pas cher forum acheter ligne france fr cialis achat eldepryl pharmacie belgique acheter bystolic pfizer belgique acheter strattera en france achat en ligne cafergot quebec effexor indications contre mĂ©dicament puis-je prendre deux trazodone 50 mg vrai aldactone pas chere chibro proscar cheveux coumadin pas cher en pharmacie buspar pas cher livraison rapide fleurs vrai cialis canada acheter protonix sans ordonnance en france achat fertomid pharmacie achat en ligne hydrochlorothiazide quebecor achat de coreg en ligne combien cytotec coĂ»t en afrique du sud gĂ©nĂ©rique calan zantac sirop posologie comment prendre cytotec pour avortement vente v-gel comparaison aciphex pas cher vol plavix pas chere vente trileptal thymoregulateur lamictal vente zestoretic gĂ©nĂ©rique acheter benicar 100mg pfizer prometrium et nourriture acheter strattera medication chat legislation vente libre micronase suisse comment acheter zyban en ligne cipro xl produit laitier vente aciclovir generique france acheter tegretol sur internet achat ayurslim gĂ©nĂ©rique en france achat lithium clomid grossesse jumeaux gsk coreg cr 40 mg 100 mg benadryl sommeil puis-je acheter zovirax sur le comptoir au canada pharex orlistat prix clomid 100mg jours 3-7 vs 5-9 acheter deltasone en ligne en france xeloda 300 mg achat en ligne de astelin masculin alavert pas cher ici mag vente de duetact pas chere les images du gĂ©nĂ©rique effexor xr celexa 80 mg acheter precose pfizer sans ordonnance achat en ligne amitriptyline vente achat minomycin en ligne france acheter levlen achat levitra en ligne canada achat zocor laboratoire achat detrol en pharmacie cialis 20mg wirkungsdauer acheter confido quand commencer clomid cycle site pour acheter cialis generique acheter rumalaya forum avis acheter du viagra Ă  san francisco provera generique pas cher en france acheter probalan en pharmacie sans ordonnance hydrea dangereux vente trileptal france achat cipro en suisse magasin de meubles lacs italiens aciclovir sirop posologie etodolac pas cher livraison rapide colis acheter hyzaar posologie solupred paroxetine hcl 20 mg rose acheter du aygestin pas cher sur internet
 
Common Law Review
 
Domù arrow Èlánky arrow Issue 8 - Contract Law arrow 13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration
13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration PDF Tisk E-mail

When values change

Re-negotiating Consideration

Tereza Šimanovská

 

1. Introduction

Throughout history, a number of common law doctrines have developed to determine whether a contract was validly concluded and whether it is enforceable in law. One such doctrine is the need for a contract to be supported by consideration.

The basic idea behind the doctrine of consideration is reciprocity – i.e. a person should not be allowed to enforce another”s promise unless he or she has given or promised to give something in exchange for that promise.1 In essence, consideration is the “value” or “price” that one contributes towards a bargain.

Consideration must also be provided when modifying a contract. This rule of the orthodox doctrine of consideration has recently undergone a very significant change and it may have cast doubt on the future of consideration itself. The issue concerns the nature of consideration upon the variation or re-negotiation of a contract and, more specifically, when one party is promised additional money to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation.

 

2. Re-negotiation of a contract – Need for fresh consideration

Until recently it was well-established that performance of a pre-existing contractual duty owed to the other contractual party could not amount to good consideration. In plain words, when someone merely performs what he was already bound to do, such performance is not good consideration to enforce a promise of extra money. He did not provide anything additional – he did not provide any consideration for the extra money paid by the other party. It can be said that the promisee does “the same for more”.2

In reality, however, contractual renegotiations are commonplace in the daily commercial practice of almost all industries: whilst performing a previously-concluded contract, circumstances may arise which force the parties to renegotiate their agreement and alter the original price. Indeed, it seems rather unfair to deny the parties such a possibility.

When parties decide to modify a contract they should bear in mind that, just as consideration was necessary to create the original contract, “fresh” consideration is required to effect a valid modification of that original contract. There are two ways to ensure that a promise for extra money is enforceable. Either one party does something “more” than was required by the original agreement or that original agreement is discharged by both parties and a new agreement concluded.3 Traditionally, the courts have been unwilling to imply that an original agreement was “torn up” and a new one concluded – this is a conclusion they are willing to reach only where the evidence clearly supports such a finding. Regardless of how artificial these two ways may appear, if the parties wish to alter the price stipulated in the original contract, they should ensure there is fresh consideration for the promise of such additional money.

3. Traditional doctrine of Stilk v Myrick

This aspect of the consideration doctrine originates from the case of Stilk v Myrick.4 Myrick was a captain on a ship who employed Stilk to work on a Baltic Sea voyage. During the voyage two members of the crew deserted and the master promised that the remaining sailors could share the deserters” wages amongst themselves if they sailed the ship back home. Upon arrival at the dock, the master refused to honour that promise and Stilk sued for the sum. His claim failed.

When explaining the grounds upon which the judgment was decided, it must be emphasised that this case was published in two separate law reports, both of which offered different ratios. Nevertheless, Campbell”s report has generally been considered correct, and its ratio accepted as the precedent governing this area of law.5 The main reason it gives for the failure of Stilk”s claim is that the agreement lacked consideration. The sailors were not entitled to the additional payment because they merely did what they were obliged to do by virtue of their original contract. They provided no new consideration for the captain”s promise of extra money.

The other source, the Espinasse report, says that the main reason for the result was public policy. It was undesirable that it should be open to the sailors in the future to exercise improper pressure on their master to increase their wages. This report makes no reference to the fact that lack of consideration would bar the claim, and instead focuses on the need to avoid what would in modern law be referred to as economic duress.6 Economic duress exists when one party illegitimately abuses his or her superior economic power to coerce the other party into agreeing to a particular set of terms.7 A contract entered into under economic duress is voidable and may be set aside by the court.8

In any case, it has always been the first report that was applied. The rule about the existing duty laid by the Campbell report was followed many times afterwards,9 but has always been somewhat controversial. It simply does not seem fair that a party can breach his or her promise and get away with it, even if the other party acted upon that promise in good faith.

There have been some voices criticising this rule. For example, Lord Denning tried to escape it because it can often lead to unfair results. He stated in Ward v Byham10 that “a promise to perform an existing duty,11 or the performance of it, should be regarded as good consideration, because it is a benefit to the person to whom it is given.” The promisor in fact benefited from the situation – he obtained “factual benefit”.12

Nevertheless, most of the judiciary were not willing to come to such radical conclusions. In Ward v Byham the remaining judges expressly refused Lord Denning”s revolutionary proposition. Throughout history, rather than going against the traditional doctrine, courts were often ready to find consideration even where one could say that there was none to be found. Sometimes it is said that courts “invented consideration” to abide by the orthodox doctrine.13

4. Revolution against the old approach: No legal benefit necessary

The controversial case of Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd.14 might be labelled as falling into this category. This decision has dramatically changed the traditional doctrine regarding pre-existing contractual duty and has cast great uncertainty over the future development of consideration in this area.

 

4.1 Williams v Roffey

The Roffey Brothers were builders who contracted with a housing association to refurbish a block of 27 flats. They sub-contracted the carpentry work to Williams for £20,000. Williams got into financial difficulties and it was apparent that he might not be able to complete the work on time. It was mainly because Wiliams had underpriced his contract. The second reason was deficiency in William”s supervision of his workers. Roffey Bros. became worried that they would be liable under a penalty clause in their main contract and promised Williams an additional sum of £10,300. This was to be paid at the rate of £575 per flat on completion. Williams finished eight more flats but only received £1,500. Williams ultimately sued Roffey Bros. for the remaining sum.

The main issue before the Court of Appeals was whether Williams provided consideration for the additional £10,300 promised by Roffey Bros. The court held that the agreement to pay the extra money was enforceable. This came as a great surprise. It defied the traditional rule set out in Stilk v Myrick. What was the consideration provided by Williams? He only did the work that he was bound to do by his original agreement – he only performed a duty already owed to Roffey.

 

4.2 New form of consideration: Practical benefit

In Williams v. Roffey, the court found valid consideration in the practical benefit that Roffey obtained by his agreement with Williams. So far the practical/factual benefit (Denning) has been refused as good consideration. The argument has always been that consideration must be something of value in the eyes of law – something that provides or brings about a legal benefit.

What was this practical benefit? It consisted of a number of factors. The court held that it was the fact that Williams continued his work and did not breach the sub-contract. Therefore, Roffey avoided the trouble of looking for somebody else to complete the work. Furthermore, Roffey avoided the penalty payment for the delay under the main contract. Also, by directing the claimant to complete one flat at a time, the defendant was able to organize their work with other subcontractors in a more efficient manner. It is clear that the logic of “factual benefit” earlier argued by Lord Denning was applied here. Even though there was no legal benefit to Roffey, the contractual modification, in fact, benefited Roffey.

It is questionable whether this reasoning about “practical benefits” is persuasive enough to disregard the need for a legal benefit and change this rule in such a dramatic way. When looking at each of the “practical benefits”, one realizes that they do not consist of anything additional. Roffey would have received all of these benefits under the original contract, even if it were not modified. In fact, all of these new “advantages” were the very reason why they concluded the original contract. Williams was hired as the subcontractor to do the work. Therefore, the main purpose here was not to look for anyone else to do the job. Similarly, the fact that Roffey did not have to pay the penalty because the plaintiff continued the work was the very reason that a subcontractor would have been hired initially. The question is: how can this count as a fresh consideration? Was this not yet another “invented consideration” by the courts?

 

4.3 Practical benefit justified by commercial reality

On the other hand, it can be argued that this pragmatic decision finally concedes what can be called “commercial reality”. After all, it is a common practice in the building industry for the main contractor to increase sub-contractors” payments if the parties see that the price is too low. As the counsel for the plaintiff argued, “It would be unfortunate if English law deprived an acceptable commercial practice, which both parties regard as beneficial, of legal effect.” Thus, the court should look at the situation as it stands and acknowledge what in fact is beneficial for the parties, as opposed to seeking a theoretical “legal benefit”. The preference should be given to what the actual intention of the parties was when renegotiating the contract, so that their intended agreement is given effect. Would it not be unfair to negate their clear arrangement that was entered into voluntarily? Russel LJ said: “Consideration there must be but courts should be more ready to find its existence as to reflect the intention of the parties.”

Obviously, there are two competing principles to be weighed regarding the doctrine of consideration. It can be said that modifications are in the public interest and both parties should be encouraged to bargain their way out of an unanticipated difficulty. On the other hand, it is also desirable to hold parties to the contractual terms of their bargain.15 Clearly, there are pros and cons to each of the two conflicting interests.

 

5. Potential escape from a contract as a value?

Another issue should be contemplated in this area. It was said that Williams suffered a detriment by continuing the work and not breaching the contract. His counsel argued “he (Williams) might have been better off by breaking the contract, getting higher paid work elsewhere and paying such damages as the contractor can recover against him”.16 Can this constitute good consideration? Can this be anything of value in the eyes of law? This proposition seems to undermine the sanctity of contracts. It is an old principle of law that people should be held to their bargains – Pacta sunt servanda. Therefore, the legal practice should promote this principle and not acknowledge that a threatened breach of contract is a viable basis for finding consideration. Such reasoning does not seem correct as a part of legal practice.

Threatening with breach of contract to increase the agreed price is indeed walking on thin ice. As mentioned above, agreements that are achieved by illegitimate pressure exercised by the party with greater economic power can be set aside on the grounds of economic duress.17 It was very important that in Williams v Roffey duress was not established on the facts of the case. The main reason that the judgment was given for Williams was almost certainly because duress was not involved. Roffey called for the meeting because it was obvious that the work would not be finished as planned. Williams did not explicitly threaten with breach of contract.

 

6. Consequences of the new approach to consideration

Undoubtedly, Williams v Roffey significantly widened the scope of the doctrine of consideration. Promises to perform existing duties can now be good consideration when they lead to practical benefit. As the doctrine of duress is a relatively new concept (first acknowledged in 1976), in the past, courts used consideration in situations that would nowadays be judged in terms of duress. In situations like those in Stilk v Myrick, the judge could not avail himself of economic duress and instead used lack of consideration as the reason for his judgment. Thus, a case like Stilk would be decided differently today. Most likely, it would be brought as a duress case and not necessarily fail for lack of consideration. It could be stated that the Court of Appeals followed the reasoning from the Espinasse report.18

 

6.1 Reconciliation of Stilk v Myrick and Williams v Roffey

It would seem that Williams v Roffey overruled Stilk v Myrick, but the court emphasized that Stilk still remains good law and distinguished Williams v Roffey. Glidwell LJ said that Williams v Roffey does not contravene the principles from Stilk, but that it “refines and limits” the application of them. However, it is not wholly clear from the judgment on what basis the court arrived at this conclusion. The judges argued that the rigid approach to consideration in Stilk was only a product of the special conditions of the seafare in the 18th century, and that it was too harsh to exist without changes in the modern day. However, the two cases are very similar. Myrick also obtained practical benefit because the sailors continued performance of their contract. Furthermore, Williams v Roffey was later applied in an employment case19 where it was held that when an employee”s wage is increased, sufficient consideration for the increase is the fact that the employee continues his or her work and does not try to bargain for more money.20 Is this not exactly the same situation as in Stilk?

Even if the court was so resolute that Stilk has not been overruled, it seems difficult to defend this idea for much longer. The conclusion could be drawn that the only principle that has survived the attack of Williams v Roffey is that consideration is still required when modifying a contract, while Stilk has been overruled as to what counts as fresh consideration.21

6.2 Application in day-to-day business

It is without a doubt that “practical benefit” is now a recognized category that can be used in practice to establish consideration. Lawyers arguing enforcement of promises for extra payment when the consideration is of doubtful value should avail themselves of “practical benefit” and argue that effect should be given to “commercial reality.” Furthermore, lawyers should argue that it is in the interest of the parties to reach a viable solution that is acceptable to everyone. It is, after all, in the public interest to bargain one”s way out of a stalemate rather than end up in a costly litigation process.

On the other hand, it has become more difficult for the opposing party to attack such contractual modifications because it is no longer so simple to plead lack of consideration where some sort of benefit can be found. It should be argued that there is no legal or practical benefit, and therefore no consideration. The security of contracts should be emphasized – people should get what they bargain for and not be pushed to pay more if difficulties arise. Any sign of duress makes such modification unenforceable. Therefore, one should always look at the process of renegotiation. Simply, was there any sign of improper pressure from the party who was in the stronger contractual position? If so, economic duress should be pleaded as a vitiating factor to the promise.

Williams v Roffey has since been applied in two cases,22 both dealing with renegotiation of commercial contracts. In each case it was held that consideration lay in the “practical benefit” that one party obtained because the other party did not breach the contract and continued its performance.23

 

7. Conclusion: What is the future of consideration?

A new liberal approach has been set. Courts are now more willing to find consideration just to give effect to what they perceive as the actual intent of the parties. This tolerant attitude is counter-balanced by the use of duress as the tool to limit bargains that have been achieved by improper means. The issue is whether this situation is wholly satisfactory. Courts have not been clear enough about the future application of this new approach, and it is evident that the doctrine of consideration in this area has been plunged into confusion.

These reflections might lead to a more revolutionary interpretation of Williams v Roffey. Is there really a need for consideration when varying a contract? American law, for example, does not require it.24 Maybe it is finally time to stop being too afraid of changes and to move ahead. After all, is this not the real unexpressed meaning of Williams v Roffey? It seems that law would become more efficient without the formalistic burden of consideration when modifying a contract.

Reflections about contractual modifications might logically lead us even further. Is consideration necessary at all? It appears that consideration as a principle is still adhered to, but this effort has become somewhat forced. The civil law system can do well without consideration. There exists an increasing hostility towards the old doctrine. It has become more of a technical obstacle than a useful and essential tool. Maybe the modern law should finally get rid of this ancient principle and replace it with more effective doctrines.

Were the judges too afraid to explicitly admit that Williams v Roffey might be the beginning of the end of consideration?

Tereza Šimanovská is a second-year law student at the Faculty of Law, Charles University in Prague. She has spent one year in London, where she studied at the Faculty of Law at the University of Westminster.

 

 

 

Bibliography


Atiyah P S, Essays on Contract, 1st Edition, Reprinted (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2001)


Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005)


McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005)


Noble M, For Your Consideration, November 8 1991, New Law Journal, Butterworth &Co (Publishers) Ltd


Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005)


Treitel G, Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2002)

 

 

...................

1 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 85

2 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp147

3 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 96

4 Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Camp 317 and 6 Esp 129

5 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 95

6 Ibid

7 Ibid pp 358

8 Nevertheless, there is no evidence that the sailors in Stilk v Myrick actually used any pressure to get the extra money. On the contract, it was Myrick himself who promised the increase of wages because he needed to get the ship home. Thus, whilst no actual duress was proved in this, the decision aimed to pre-emptively prevent such situations occurring in the future.

9 For example Atlas Express v Kafco [1989] QB 833

10 Ward v Byham [1956] 1 WLR 496

11 However, here Lord Denning was concerned with a pre-existing duty deriving from public law, not a duty owed under a contract.

12 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp 145

13 Prof Treitel as cited in McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 86

14 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

15 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 99

16 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

17 However, a distinction should be made between threats of breach of contract that amount to economic duress and behaviour that only amounts to acceptable commercial pressure. It should be highlighted that at the moment the law is not very clear about where the exact borderline lays. It seems that not all threats of breach of contract are automatically illegal.

18 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 100

19 Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications [1993] IRLR 383

20 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

21 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp153

22 Anangel Atlas Compania Naviera SA v Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co Ltd (no 2) [1990] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 526; Simon Container Machinery Ltd v Emba Machinery AB [1998] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 429

23 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

24 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 102.

 
< Pűedch.   Další >