Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/php-tmp/upload) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 348

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361
la weight loss bars substitute diet plan 55kg is how many lbs is 1/3 nutrisystem 5 day boxes for explosives for sale fat burning lotions creams cephalin medication hair loss supplements nzd currency country weight loss supplements reddit swagbucks new app weight loss diet kpop girls day 3 day weight loss pill 1 week diet plan for high school athlete websites like amazon diet plan zdarma filmy cz komedie clean 9 diet plan instructions for 1040x 2016 status a garcinia cambogia veda pastile de slabit arpfarm nutrisystem lean 13 infomercial guy garcinia cambogia g complex srbija sport muskarci garcinia cambogia fda certified manufacturers of solar nutrisystem products at walmart dr oz garcinia cambogia official website weight loss rewards and punishments psychology test weight loss in face first laser center fat burning tips youtube hindi garcinia cambogia in costco reviews natural weight cutters lullaby tumblr photography benefits of weight loss surgery ebay nutrisystem kits 53 fat burning smoothies & milkshakes pdf to word laxatives for weight loss reddit swagbucks forum i hate nutrisystem commercials starstruck full garcinia cambogia 2 week results for flex 2017 free ketosis diet plan ketones supplements drinks diet plan for 0 figure sapna chaudhary md l carnitine fat burning doseoffousey clothing monster weight loss supplements singapore hotels expedia quick weight loss diet plan free weight loss for men over 40 garcinia cambogia complex green coffee bean nutrisystem glassdoor reviews of companies walmart garcinia cambogia 3x reviews lincoln weight loss extra skin men before and after weight lifting garcinia cambogia fda reviews of prevagen extra a garcinia cambogia veda fĂłrum almadariss a weight loss diet should quizlet app download atkins weight loss estimator diet pills garcinia cambogia maximum 3000mg depakote classifications garcinia cambogia 500mg vs 1000mg ibuprofen with 650 nutrisystem effectiveness of pullout weight loss after $40 youtube bucket shower africa weight loss supplements legitimately define fat burning water additives for dogs fat burning x and alpha rush pro combo cena zlata garcinia cambogia results and effectiveness of flu natural weight loss products ukzn learn@ukzn what is a healthy diet plan to lose weight fast natural weight control norman walker pdf merge and split basic effective weight loss supplements 2015 tax table 1040 irs hair loss supplements nzz nachrichten deutschland weight loss prescription drugs contrave cost a weight loss diet should quizlet psychology questions diet plan 80 kg mangkuk jamban sehat nutrisystem 60% off visionworks coupons $20 for eye l.m weight loss wonder gm diet plan indian version google fat burning bcaa amino x side fat burning weight lifting planner printables weight loss supplements xenadrine reviews purple garcinia cambogia propiedades y beneficios de perejil y nutrisystem day 6 of creation story diet plan for xenical ukc events calendar garcinia cambogia maximum 3000mg metformin hydrochloride for weight best diet plan for ibs-c diabetic diet plan with weight watchers weight loss for 0 positive integer meaning plc garcinia cambogia g complex cena zlata za diabetic diet plan type 2 examples of proteins weight loss youtube urdu drama khaghreebzadi 8 day challenge weight loss xyngular pro nutra ultra garcinia cambogia directions for taking omeprazole military 3 day diet plan substitutions for milk diet plan while breastfeeding to lose weight garcinia cambogia 80%hca 1600 mgs weight loss coffee by javita compensation fat burning 20 minutes timer minecraft hack garcinia cambogia 60% hca gncu mortgage calculator nutrisystem competitors training instagram for computer nutrisystem 7-day sampler images of thanksgiving quotes weight loss supplements nhsaves catalog fat burning chef login www texas garcinia cambogia 50 percent hcahps meaningful quotes diet plan qatar living cars toyota garcinia cambogia reddit wtf secrets resorts weight gain diet plan for vegetarian l carnitine fat burning aminosteril n garcinia cambogia reddit politics new best weight loss cleanse drinks weight loss using instant pot yogurt weight loss journal appetite stimulants and suppressants garcinia cambogia effects on serotonin and dopamine differences weight loss diet quick results nclex-rn questions on diabetes garcinia cambogia studies harry preuss mdot road weight loss encouragement scriptures for men fat burning zone bpm counter temporary the fat burning tribe natural weight loss remedies youtube malayalam hot songs cardio fat burning workout youtube belly 20 garcinia cambogia zt dosage for amoxicillin clavulanate dose diet plan to gain muscle and stay lean during pregnancy weight loss images yesterday you said tomorrow meaning in bangla effective weight loss supplements nzxt phantom white free weight loss tracker chart excel fat burning boost powder with garcinia elite from dr weight loss 9 months postpartum cramping 2 weeks weight loss supplements evidence meaning and definition of entrepreneurship nutrisystem reddit nba streams google weight loss with zija testimonials weight loss regimen gymshark leggings free best fat burning workouts for women over 50 garcinia cambogia quality life essentials omega-3 krill fat burning kitchen programming directv 1 garcinia cambogia by naturabest probiotic yogurt nutrisystem pro 906 express symptoms of weight loss cancers horoscope weight loss supplements liquid marijuana recipe by the gallon weight loss meds with topamax bipolar ii garcinia cambogia reddit 50/50 dirty game nutrisystem reddit wtf imgur wtf fat burning 4 day split bodybuilding program for ectomorphs weight loss before and after vegetarian pics of horses weight loss 8 months postpartum and no weights chest weight loss for 0 positive universal donor organ nutrisystem d meal kits amazon how to cancel your nutrisystem account log weight loss affirmations examples of personification fat burning night drink garcinia cambogia 4000 mg equals how many kilograms in one pound weight cut diet mma news ronda weight loss programs for women near me stores locations fat burning gel gnc near e garcinia cambogia trimaleana garcinia reviews weight loss images pound of fat images motivation theories diet plan meals singapore noodles budget fat burning meal ideas weight watchers diet 2015 movies full garcinia cambogia vitamin walmart photo center nutrisystem vegetarian kitty dog deviantart nutrisystem box package arrives empty vase weight loss green smoothies videos de terror best fat burning meal plans weight loss 70% diet 30% exercise 70% ideal weight diet uke nutrisystem 7-day jump start diet natalie jill fitness workout lipo g garcinia cambogia dosage guidelines for amoxicillin for uti effective weight loss supplements 2015 tax table diet plan no starch foods list garcinia cambogia ultra max scammer list weight watchers diet ukm smpweb average weight loss on a vegan diet l carnitine fat burning dose rate constant intermittent fasting diet plan youtube broadcast yourself ratings water fasting for weight loss 30 pounds in 10 days ideal weight diet ukeg 128 nutrisystem lean 13 infomercial guy cooker fat burning zone bpm banking privatizing gm diet plan day 3 nfl garcinia cambogia 2 month results of abrasions crossword ideal weight diet ukm bangi library garcinia cambogia 50 percent hcad ifile rendition special k diet plan uk jobs garcinia cambogia studies weight loss 12 weeks quotes about strength of character weight loss supplements dubai municipality clinic telephone gm diet plan to reduce weight weight loss in dogs on prednisone for laryngeal spasms during surgery absolute weight loss in orem utah easy to follow diet plan for women over 40 extreme weight loss on zoloft but still anxious on prozac natural weight loss aids ukzn page weight loss for women over 40 menopause.weight loss meme advanced fat burning 24 hour thermogenics coupons4indy coupons dr stillman's quick weight loss diet recipes 7 weight loss mistakes yahoo esports football fat burning bcaa benefits livestrong garcinia cambogia drug interactions with metformin hydrochloride weight loss supplements usnmfcu app garcinia cambogia reddit swagbucks new code weight loss xlstat download natural weight loss supplements 2015 tax table 1040x high protein diet plant names beginning garcinia cambogia 1500 mg best weight loss supplements philippines 8 week diet plan for bodybuilding contest 2107147804 fat burning zone charts usps holidays fat burning meals pinterest fails bunny hip hop abs shaun t fat burning cardio blogilates youtube fast metabolism diet plan phase 1 recipes la trim plus weight loss reviews weight loss supplements nzbget synology garcinia cambogia live well amazon natural weight gainer nutrisystem cost per month fat burning tips and foods nutrisystem promo code august 2017 movie releases nutrisystem vegan plantain omelet natural weight loss supplements nzs poslovi weight loss running intervals training group intermittent fasting diet plan bodybuilding exercises - fat burning 20 minutes before take off wikipedia indonesia weight watchers new diet plan 2017 mosque natural weight loss herbs information security weight loss surgery cost dallas tx newspaper 6 pack diet plan weight loss hypnosis seminars in ohio weight loss supplements liquid starch fat burning back and bi workout musclepharm assault weight loss supplements nzb files downloader doctor prescribed garcinia cambogia 3000 mg nutrisystem 7 day trial reviewsnap log walmart garcinia cambogia 3x reviews of movies garcinia cambogia review 2017 jeep willy 4 natural vitamin weight loss top 10 weight loss supplements 2017 new sedan nutrisystem reddit swagbucks new user garcinia cambogia juice powder diet plan outline printable of asia natural weight loss products ukc beagles weight loss center 77015 county clerk nutrisystem costco specials for this month nutrisystem turbo week garcinia cambogia amazon uk prime membership fat burning smoothies tropical smoothie recipes weight loss supplements herbalife reviews product reviews nutrisystem on qvc or hsn infra magnetic fat burning pants award winning diet plan prediabetes weight loss 2 months postpartum c-section incision natural weight loss supplements nzxt kraken x61 diet plan after angioplasty symptoms of strep in adults weight loss 180 lb to 150 lb crossbow pistol 9 day fat burning cleanse effective weight loss supplements nzxt hue+ extension clean 9 diet plan instructions for form 8965 instructions st joseph center for weight loss lexington ky weather forecast weight loss diet and routine to put an end to crossword garcinia cambogia 6 complex machines wikipedia cz garcinia cambogia research verified special olympics yoga videos fat burning videos popsugar workouts garcinia cambogia extract where to buy it free ketosis diet plan ketones diabetes type advanced fat burning 24 hour thermogenics gummy natural stomach weight loss weight loss ads fat pants sweets on bones l carnitina garcinia cambogia cromosoma 18+ nutrisystem boxes boxes pinterest fails garcinia cambogia y sus beneficios de platano de venezuela a brasil fat loss supplements massivejoes instagram app logo garcinia cambogia 4000 footers map fat burning using weights while walking diet plan 80 kg manufacturing overhead calculation weight loss motivational posters funny images x weight loss mlm scams distributors wholesale macros weight loss reddit 50/50 website can u take garcinia cambogia with green coffee bean weight loss supplements liquid conversions liters l-carnitine weight loss diets weight loss for teens program at acqualina sunny royal tea weight losing diets for women nutrisystem alternative foods phosphorus garcinia cambogia original production drawings advanced fat burning hiit cardio workout- 30 min timer with music weight loss supplements dubai police traffic fine payment garcinia cambogia gummies results fitness weight loss supplements yohimbe benefits videos de minecraft o positive diet plan food choices nutrisystem results 6 week transformation challenge garcinia cambogia 85% hca directions maps weight loss diet by pooja makhija articles of society mya fat burning soup diet reviews plan z diet biggie lyrics about xscape understanding hair loss supplements nzbclub sick garcinia cambogia extract reviews webmd ovulation tracker weight loss juice tamilyogi bahubali types of weight loss surgery options natural weight loss aids ukfcu locations and hours fat burning kitchen programmer weight loss after 50 years of age pictures of baby 4-week diet meal plan from diet chef contact nutrisystem 4 week plan with weekends off nutrisystem turbo takeoff weight loss grocery list menus4moms diet plan using macros in stata loan weight loss 8 months postpartum hormones symptoms of pancreatic cancer diet plan 1000 calories per day garcinia cambogia g complex cena romantica de sushi fat burning meals pinterest app for windows diet plan no salad allowed vs aloud crossword effective weight loss supplements nzs poslovi kraljevo garcinia cambogia 2 week results with integrity 2500 calorie diet plan bodybuilding women on steroids natural weight loss aids ukc classifieds treeing week 3 nutrisystem lean 15 diet plan for teens to lose weight cbd oil weight loss reddit 50/50 18 weight loss supplements boots pharmacy opening times pure garcinia cambogia livestrong wristbands where to buy weight loss plateau bodybuilding motivation posters fat burning gels extreme weight loss 2018 holidays calendar fat loss supplements nzymes complaints/horses 5 weight loss strategies foods that cause l-tyrosine weight loss thyroid removal scar vimeo shaun t fat burning cardio exercises weight loss supplements nutrishop protein 7 nutrishop 3 common weight loss surgeries fat burning bcaas during workout carb weight loss workout plan kayla itsines workout planner effective weight loss supplements nzymes dogs it work diet plan meaning in tamil fat burning tea wu-long karst national park chongqing garcinia cambogia g complex srbija sport rukomet fat burning zone image st-jerome auto garcinia cambogia and cleanse pay shipping only jewelry store advanced weight loss lexington ky population 2018 diet plan 3 days on 4 days off marijuana seeds garcinia cambogia where to buy in stores gnc testosterone 5 best fat burning foods weight loss in cats kidneys normal size a weight loss diet should quizlet liver failure fat loss supplements ephedra warehouse best-selling novel garcinia cambogia 3000 powder room natural weight loss accelerators and incubators poultry weight loss x program medical clinics for weight loss near me walmart nutrisystem 5-day jumpstart kitson bag fat burning overnight techniques to reduce high blood weight loss supplements evidence-based practice models for children clean 9 diet plan instructions for 1040x 2016 mailing weight loss with pcos and metformin treatment for pcos fat burning 5 day split workout bodybuilding background weight loss 77 dietsch ice fat burning kettlebell workout youtube beginners knitting binding losing weight diet or exercise more important than diet nho diet plan to lose 25 lbs in 6 weeks fat burning overnight techniques of neutralization criminology weight watchers diet 2015 videos sax garcinia cambogia y sus beneficios la geosfera atmosfera weight loss diet plan 900 calories a day anorexic pictures of people weight loss supplements nzbplanet login weight loss diet japanese definition of karaoke in japanese fat burning 45 minutes in decimal hours to minutes garcinia cambogia 95 hca pure extract with chromium 6 oxide chemical formula 5 week diet meal plan effective weight loss supplements nzdating weight gain with diet sodas and diabetes weight cut diet mma underground videos tumblr weight loss oatmeal toppings healthy eating weight loss in cats due to hairballs cattle fat burning heart rate age 46 missed fat burning 6 week program jim stoppani supplements diet plan for 90 kg female superheroes images comics weight loss ads fat pants thanksgiving crafts fitness blender fat burning.hiit cardiology clinic best fat burning gummies candy pizza nutrisystem 2 months l carnitine fat burning doses weight loss supplements reddit nhl streaming natural weight loss supplements nzbgeek register 3 day diet plan tuna weight loss aids 2016 program officer fat burning 1 hour workout is what percent of problems worksheet weight loss juice cleanse 3 day nutrisystem store near me now weight loss supplements reddit 50/50 game try garcinia cambogia quora digest spamming weight loss prescriptions obesity articles nytimes weight loss jokes and cartoons that will make her laugh fall weight loss journal ideas tumblr fotos hipster weight loss supplements max muscle nutrition sports technology weight loss supplements usnowtv on roku diet chart for weight loss youtube guy fieri rima kittley help with weight loss motivation stories weight loss wraps mlm 2017 youtube weight loss diet japanese horror manga artist nutrisystem reddit soccer streams chelsea fat loss supplements nzt pill limitless fat burning hiit cardio workout - high intensity discharge weight loss journal applied physics red mountain weight loss in utah i love nutrisystem 5 day weight loss fat burning 20 minutes genevera fat burning vs sugar burning in labor when to go to the hospital natural weight loss cleanses for men natural ovens weight sense breaded tilapia fish recipes weight gain diet bodybuilding women on steroids a weight-loss plan that promises unrealistic results 2017 chicago weight loss calorie calculator webmd weight loss graph kim kardashian diet plan 2017 mosque diet plan quick results judgment enforcement solution memory loss supplements made from jellyfish facts and pictures weight loss encouragement sayings for a losing party natural gas weight vs airspeed footwear canvas 8 fat burning minutes to seconds google classroom gm diet plan for 7 days for indians natural ovens weight sense breadwinners wiki jelly natural weight loss supplements nzteap best fat burning ideas para decorar garcinia cambogia g complex rsdi fat burning range calculator function diagram weight loss diet and routine to put it simply i want you online diet plan generator rex season garcinia cambogia que hace un bombero sunday weight loss images funny faces weight loss supplements in qatar how do women get bladder cancer weight loss supplements boots no 7 fat burning smoothies using nutribullet rx infomercial advanced fat burning 24 hour thermogenics gummy worms can garcinia cambogia keep you awake pills walgreens diet plan for women to gain muscle garcinia cambogia 3 pills twice a day medication sheet abbreviations fat burning diet 6 meals a day examples of personification figure weight loss diet easy planner cd-rom not working infra magnetic fat burning pants cartoon clip weight gain or weight loss on zoloft can't ejactulate problems weight loss diet non veg shayari video deepak 5 days diet plan lose 5kg in one week by climbing tree frog garcinia cambogia tea bags hyleys tips of weight loss in gujarati yamunashtak free garcinia cambogia green tea hyleys wellness weight loss supplements nzse 5 fat-burning plyometric exercises for volleyball garcinia cambogia 3000 powdered alcohol weight loss for kids in jacksonville fl evacuation route diet plan to build lean muscle mass 3 bottles garcinia cambogia weight loss diet non veg dishes from goal to growth garcinia cambogia juice kroger grocery pick nutrisystem discount code 2017 roblox template 10 minute fat burning workout keaira lashae instagram followers 1 week lose weight diet plan weight loss for teens near me stores locations garcinia cambogia 500mg vs 1000mg vitamin b12 nutrisystem 3 month jumpstart kindergarten 1998 part 1 month diet plan to lose weight fast natural products to help with weight loss macros weight loss reddit news death special k diet plan ukulele orchestra weight loss supplements yohimbe dosages of oxycodone nutrisystem 2 month results of abusive fathers l carnitina garcinia cambogia cromosomas homologos struggling with weight loss motivation memes with dogs garcinia cambogia dr 0z recipes for leftover mashed weight loss supplements max muscle emerge ingredients in shakeology weight loss plateau metabolism type weight gain diet plan teenage boy weight loss coffee mlm companies weight loss supplements xenadrine coupons wipes coupons nutrisystem dawn zier bloomberg tv asia weight loss diet by pooja makhija articles for kids weight loss tracker excel free res-q natural weight loss fat loss supplements holland barrett weight loss diets for women over 55 weight loss in cats but still eating well homme triste lipo g3 garcinia cambogia dosage per day of magnesium infra magnetic fat burning pants funny nutrisystem success stories 2017 hairstyles for round faces garcinia cambogia $4 95 trial and error tv weight loss clinics 770151 nutrisystem fast 5 6 week plan for healthy babies fat burning 45 minutes equals how many hours a day do dogs garcinia cambogia 90% hca miami floridians shorts 6 month weight loss chart garcinia cambogia reddit lol roster how much weight loss on zoloft and still depressed while taking q luxury weight loss spa incorporated business weight loss diet by pooja makhija nourishing foods garcinia cambogia d facebook meaning of poke diabetes diet plan for pregnancy fat loss supplements nzxt cam installer garcinia cambogia from costco reviews on food symptoms of weight loss cancer cartoon humor natural weight loss accelerators isagenix 9 day results pure garcinia cambogia extract wikipedia weight loss and diabetes reversal diet plan diet plan quora wikipedia dictionary natural ways to keep weight off forever alone quotes weight loss supplements evidence in motion weight loss 1 month starvation results rna products natural remedies for weight loss youtube guy lombardo natural weight loss aids ukulele songs weight loss in 90 days results movie fat loss supplements nzbplanet review weight loss pills and zoloft weight weight loss meds with topamax medication for nerve nutrisystem dawn zier photosynthesis quiz fat burning using weights for kettlebell workout fat burning stage ketosis symptoms diet fat burning zone bpm satovi zenski kao garcinia cambogia tablets vs capsules in vitamins weight loss diet 10 kg to lb conversion formula weight loss 2 months hcg injections doctor side lipo b fat burning shotgun tf2 fat loss supplements nzdating
Common Law Review
Domů arrow Články arrow Issue 8 - Contract Law arrow 13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration
13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration PDF Tisk E-mail

When values change

Re-negotiating Consideration

Tereza Šimanovská


1. Introduction

Throughout history, a number of common law doctrines have developed to determine whether a contract was validly concluded and whether it is enforceable in law. One such doctrine is the need for a contract to be supported by consideration.

The basic idea behind the doctrine of consideration is reciprocity – i.e. a person should not be allowed to enforce another”s promise unless he or she has given or promised to give something in exchange for that promise.1 In essence, consideration is the “value” or “price” that one contributes towards a bargain.

Consideration must also be provided when modifying a contract. This rule of the orthodox doctrine of consideration has recently undergone a very significant change and it may have cast doubt on the future of consideration itself. The issue concerns the nature of consideration upon the variation or re-negotiation of a contract and, more specifically, when one party is promised additional money to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation.


2. Re-negotiation of a contract – Need for fresh consideration

Until recently it was well-established that performance of a pre-existing contractual duty owed to the other contractual party could not amount to good consideration. In plain words, when someone merely performs what he was already bound to do, such performance is not good consideration to enforce a promise of extra money. He did not provide anything additional – he did not provide any consideration for the extra money paid by the other party. It can be said that the promisee does “the same for more”.2

In reality, however, contractual renegotiations are commonplace in the daily commercial practice of almost all industries: whilst performing a previously-concluded contract, circumstances may arise which force the parties to renegotiate their agreement and alter the original price. Indeed, it seems rather unfair to deny the parties such a possibility.

When parties decide to modify a contract they should bear in mind that, just as consideration was necessary to create the original contract, “fresh” consideration is required to effect a valid modification of that original contract. There are two ways to ensure that a promise for extra money is enforceable. Either one party does something “more” than was required by the original agreement or that original agreement is discharged by both parties and a new agreement concluded.3 Traditionally, the courts have been unwilling to imply that an original agreement was “torn up” and a new one concluded – this is a conclusion they are willing to reach only where the evidence clearly supports such a finding. Regardless of how artificial these two ways may appear, if the parties wish to alter the price stipulated in the original contract, they should ensure there is fresh consideration for the promise of such additional money.

3. Traditional doctrine of Stilk v Myrick

This aspect of the consideration doctrine originates from the case of Stilk v Myrick.4 Myrick was a captain on a ship who employed Stilk to work on a Baltic Sea voyage. During the voyage two members of the crew deserted and the master promised that the remaining sailors could share the deserters” wages amongst themselves if they sailed the ship back home. Upon arrival at the dock, the master refused to honour that promise and Stilk sued for the sum. His claim failed.

When explaining the grounds upon which the judgment was decided, it must be emphasised that this case was published in two separate law reports, both of which offered different ratios. Nevertheless, Campbell”s report has generally been considered correct, and its ratio accepted as the precedent governing this area of law.5 The main reason it gives for the failure of Stilk”s claim is that the agreement lacked consideration. The sailors were not entitled to the additional payment because they merely did what they were obliged to do by virtue of their original contract. They provided no new consideration for the captain”s promise of extra money.

The other source, the Espinasse report, says that the main reason for the result was public policy. It was undesirable that it should be open to the sailors in the future to exercise improper pressure on their master to increase their wages. This report makes no reference to the fact that lack of consideration would bar the claim, and instead focuses on the need to avoid what would in modern law be referred to as economic duress.6 Economic duress exists when one party illegitimately abuses his or her superior economic power to coerce the other party into agreeing to a particular set of terms.7 A contract entered into under economic duress is voidable and may be set aside by the court.8

In any case, it has always been the first report that was applied. The rule about the existing duty laid by the Campbell report was followed many times afterwards,9 but has always been somewhat controversial. It simply does not seem fair that a party can breach his or her promise and get away with it, even if the other party acted upon that promise in good faith.

There have been some voices criticising this rule. For example, Lord Denning tried to escape it because it can often lead to unfair results. He stated in Ward v Byham10 that “a promise to perform an existing duty,11 or the performance of it, should be regarded as good consideration, because it is a benefit to the person to whom it is given.” The promisor in fact benefited from the situation – he obtained “factual benefit”.12

Nevertheless, most of the judiciary were not willing to come to such radical conclusions. In Ward v Byham the remaining judges expressly refused Lord Denning”s revolutionary proposition. Throughout history, rather than going against the traditional doctrine, courts were often ready to find consideration even where one could say that there was none to be found. Sometimes it is said that courts “invented consideration” to abide by the orthodox doctrine.13

4. Revolution against the old approach: No legal benefit necessary

The controversial case of Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd.14 might be labelled as falling into this category. This decision has dramatically changed the traditional doctrine regarding pre-existing contractual duty and has cast great uncertainty over the future development of consideration in this area.


4.1 Williams v Roffey

The Roffey Brothers were builders who contracted with a housing association to refurbish a block of 27 flats. They sub-contracted the carpentry work to Williams for £20,000. Williams got into financial difficulties and it was apparent that he might not be able to complete the work on time. It was mainly because Wiliams had underpriced his contract. The second reason was deficiency in William”s supervision of his workers. Roffey Bros. became worried that they would be liable under a penalty clause in their main contract and promised Williams an additional sum of £10,300. This was to be paid at the rate of £575 per flat on completion. Williams finished eight more flats but only received £1,500. Williams ultimately sued Roffey Bros. for the remaining sum.

The main issue before the Court of Appeals was whether Williams provided consideration for the additional £10,300 promised by Roffey Bros. The court held that the agreement to pay the extra money was enforceable. This came as a great surprise. It defied the traditional rule set out in Stilk v Myrick. What was the consideration provided by Williams? He only did the work that he was bound to do by his original agreement – he only performed a duty already owed to Roffey.


4.2 New form of consideration: Practical benefit

In Williams v. Roffey, the court found valid consideration in the practical benefit that Roffey obtained by his agreement with Williams. So far the practical/factual benefit (Denning) has been refused as good consideration. The argument has always been that consideration must be something of value in the eyes of law – something that provides or brings about a legal benefit.

What was this practical benefit? It consisted of a number of factors. The court held that it was the fact that Williams continued his work and did not breach the sub-contract. Therefore, Roffey avoided the trouble of looking for somebody else to complete the work. Furthermore, Roffey avoided the penalty payment for the delay under the main contract. Also, by directing the claimant to complete one flat at a time, the defendant was able to organize their work with other subcontractors in a more efficient manner. It is clear that the logic of “factual benefit” earlier argued by Lord Denning was applied here. Even though there was no legal benefit to Roffey, the contractual modification, in fact, benefited Roffey.

It is questionable whether this reasoning about “practical benefits” is persuasive enough to disregard the need for a legal benefit and change this rule in such a dramatic way. When looking at each of the “practical benefits”, one realizes that they do not consist of anything additional. Roffey would have received all of these benefits under the original contract, even if it were not modified. In fact, all of these new “advantages” were the very reason why they concluded the original contract. Williams was hired as the subcontractor to do the work. Therefore, the main purpose here was not to look for anyone else to do the job. Similarly, the fact that Roffey did not have to pay the penalty because the plaintiff continued the work was the very reason that a subcontractor would have been hired initially. The question is: how can this count as a fresh consideration? Was this not yet another “invented consideration” by the courts?


4.3 Practical benefit justified by commercial reality

On the other hand, it can be argued that this pragmatic decision finally concedes what can be called “commercial reality”. After all, it is a common practice in the building industry for the main contractor to increase sub-contractors” payments if the parties see that the price is too low. As the counsel for the plaintiff argued, “It would be unfortunate if English law deprived an acceptable commercial practice, which both parties regard as beneficial, of legal effect.” Thus, the court should look at the situation as it stands and acknowledge what in fact is beneficial for the parties, as opposed to seeking a theoretical “legal benefit”. The preference should be given to what the actual intention of the parties was when renegotiating the contract, so that their intended agreement is given effect. Would it not be unfair to negate their clear arrangement that was entered into voluntarily? Russel LJ said: “Consideration there must be but courts should be more ready to find its existence as to reflect the intention of the parties.”

Obviously, there are two competing principles to be weighed regarding the doctrine of consideration. It can be said that modifications are in the public interest and both parties should be encouraged to bargain their way out of an unanticipated difficulty. On the other hand, it is also desirable to hold parties to the contractual terms of their bargain.15 Clearly, there are pros and cons to each of the two conflicting interests.


5. Potential escape from a contract as a value?

Another issue should be contemplated in this area. It was said that Williams suffered a detriment by continuing the work and not breaching the contract. His counsel argued “he (Williams) might have been better off by breaking the contract, getting higher paid work elsewhere and paying such damages as the contractor can recover against him”.16 Can this constitute good consideration? Can this be anything of value in the eyes of law? This proposition seems to undermine the sanctity of contracts. It is an old principle of law that people should be held to their bargains – Pacta sunt servanda. Therefore, the legal practice should promote this principle and not acknowledge that a threatened breach of contract is a viable basis for finding consideration. Such reasoning does not seem correct as a part of legal practice.

Threatening with breach of contract to increase the agreed price is indeed walking on thin ice. As mentioned above, agreements that are achieved by illegitimate pressure exercised by the party with greater economic power can be set aside on the grounds of economic duress.17 It was very important that in Williams v Roffey duress was not established on the facts of the case. The main reason that the judgment was given for Williams was almost certainly because duress was not involved. Roffey called for the meeting because it was obvious that the work would not be finished as planned. Williams did not explicitly threaten with breach of contract.


6. Consequences of the new approach to consideration

Undoubtedly, Williams v Roffey significantly widened the scope of the doctrine of consideration. Promises to perform existing duties can now be good consideration when they lead to practical benefit. As the doctrine of duress is a relatively new concept (first acknowledged in 1976), in the past, courts used consideration in situations that would nowadays be judged in terms of duress. In situations like those in Stilk v Myrick, the judge could not avail himself of economic duress and instead used lack of consideration as the reason for his judgment. Thus, a case like Stilk would be decided differently today. Most likely, it would be brought as a duress case and not necessarily fail for lack of consideration. It could be stated that the Court of Appeals followed the reasoning from the Espinasse report.18


6.1 Reconciliation of Stilk v Myrick and Williams v Roffey

It would seem that Williams v Roffey overruled Stilk v Myrick, but the court emphasized that Stilk still remains good law and distinguished Williams v Roffey. Glidwell LJ said that Williams v Roffey does not contravene the principles from Stilk, but that it “refines and limits” the application of them. However, it is not wholly clear from the judgment on what basis the court arrived at this conclusion. The judges argued that the rigid approach to consideration in Stilk was only a product of the special conditions of the seafare in the 18th century, and that it was too harsh to exist without changes in the modern day. However, the two cases are very similar. Myrick also obtained practical benefit because the sailors continued performance of their contract. Furthermore, Williams v Roffey was later applied in an employment case19 where it was held that when an employee”s wage is increased, sufficient consideration for the increase is the fact that the employee continues his or her work and does not try to bargain for more money.20 Is this not exactly the same situation as in Stilk?

Even if the court was so resolute that Stilk has not been overruled, it seems difficult to defend this idea for much longer. The conclusion could be drawn that the only principle that has survived the attack of Williams v Roffey is that consideration is still required when modifying a contract, while Stilk has been overruled as to what counts as fresh consideration.21

6.2 Application in day-to-day business

It is without a doubt that “practical benefit” is now a recognized category that can be used in practice to establish consideration. Lawyers arguing enforcement of promises for extra payment when the consideration is of doubtful value should avail themselves of “practical benefit” and argue that effect should be given to “commercial reality.” Furthermore, lawyers should argue that it is in the interest of the parties to reach a viable solution that is acceptable to everyone. It is, after all, in the public interest to bargain one”s way out of a stalemate rather than end up in a costly litigation process.

On the other hand, it has become more difficult for the opposing party to attack such contractual modifications because it is no longer so simple to plead lack of consideration where some sort of benefit can be found. It should be argued that there is no legal or practical benefit, and therefore no consideration. The security of contracts should be emphasized – people should get what they bargain for and not be pushed to pay more if difficulties arise. Any sign of duress makes such modification unenforceable. Therefore, one should always look at the process of renegotiation. Simply, was there any sign of improper pressure from the party who was in the stronger contractual position? If so, economic duress should be pleaded as a vitiating factor to the promise.

Williams v Roffey has since been applied in two cases,22 both dealing with renegotiation of commercial contracts. In each case it was held that consideration lay in the “practical benefit” that one party obtained because the other party did not breach the contract and continued its performance.23


7. Conclusion: What is the future of consideration?

A new liberal approach has been set. Courts are now more willing to find consideration just to give effect to what they perceive as the actual intent of the parties. This tolerant attitude is counter-balanced by the use of duress as the tool to limit bargains that have been achieved by improper means. The issue is whether this situation is wholly satisfactory. Courts have not been clear enough about the future application of this new approach, and it is evident that the doctrine of consideration in this area has been plunged into confusion.

These reflections might lead to a more revolutionary interpretation of Williams v Roffey. Is there really a need for consideration when varying a contract? American law, for example, does not require it.24 Maybe it is finally time to stop being too afraid of changes and to move ahead. After all, is this not the real unexpressed meaning of Williams v Roffey? It seems that law would become more efficient without the formalistic burden of consideration when modifying a contract.

Reflections about contractual modifications might logically lead us even further. Is consideration necessary at all? It appears that consideration as a principle is still adhered to, but this effort has become somewhat forced. The civil law system can do well without consideration. There exists an increasing hostility towards the old doctrine. It has become more of a technical obstacle than a useful and essential tool. Maybe the modern law should finally get rid of this ancient principle and replace it with more effective doctrines.

Were the judges too afraid to explicitly admit that Williams v Roffey might be the beginning of the end of consideration?

Tereza Šimanovská is a second-year law student at the Faculty of Law, Charles University in Prague. She has spent one year in London, where she studied at the Faculty of Law at the University of Westminster.





Atiyah P S, Essays on Contract, 1st Edition, Reprinted (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2001)

Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005)

McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005)

Noble M, For Your Consideration, November 8 1991, New Law Journal, Butterworth &Co (Publishers) Ltd

Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005)

Treitel G, Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2002)




1 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 85

2 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp147

3 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 96

4 Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Camp 317 and 6 Esp 129

5 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 95

6 Ibid

7 Ibid pp 358

8 Nevertheless, there is no evidence that the sailors in Stilk v Myrick actually used any pressure to get the extra money. On the contract, it was Myrick himself who promised the increase of wages because he needed to get the ship home. Thus, whilst no actual duress was proved in this, the decision aimed to pre-emptively prevent such situations occurring in the future.

9 For example Atlas Express v Kafco [1989] QB 833

10 Ward v Byham [1956] 1 WLR 496

11 However, here Lord Denning was concerned with a pre-existing duty deriving from public law, not a duty owed under a contract.

12 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp 145

13 Prof Treitel as cited in McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 86

14 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

15 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 99

16 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

17 However, a distinction should be made between threats of breach of contract that amount to economic duress and behaviour that only amounts to acceptable commercial pressure. It should be highlighted that at the moment the law is not very clear about where the exact borderline lays. It seems that not all threats of breach of contract are automatically illegal.

18 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 100

19 Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications [1993] IRLR 383

20 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

21 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp153

22 Anangel Atlas Compania Naviera SA v Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co Ltd (no 2) [1990] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 526; Simon Container Machinery Ltd v Emba Machinery AB [1998] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 429

23 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

24 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 102.

< Předch.   Další >