Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/php-tmp/upload) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 348

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361
qu'est ce que le mĂ©dicament clomid augmentin forte 250 mg acheter oxytrol bourges basket achat en ligne lamisil vrai sominex pas cher paris achat suhagra pas cher paris voveran pas cher vols minocycline pas cher en ligne jeux multijoueurs legislation vente libre baclofen suisse vente clomid france achat lotensin en ligne avis methotrexate 2.5 mg dose qui fabrique cymbalta gĂ©nĂ©rique achat suprax pfizer en ligne acheter mircette 100mg vente levlen en france acheter eldepryl pas cher en france requip gĂ©nĂ©rique nom achat aldactone vidal mĂ©dicaments rhinocort aqua acheter nizagara tablets vente chloramphenicol en ligne france abilify pas cher avion malaisie achat amoxil livraison rapide fleurs shatavari pas cher marques vĂȘtements zocor effets indĂ©sirables caverta pas cher livraison rapide caverta gĂ©nĂ©rique claritin examens achat en ligne ranitidine effets actonel pas cher maroc football vente paxil en ligne acheter du viagra en ligne de piĂšce de thĂ©Ăątre dulcolax vente libres effet secondaire du depo provera nexium prix cvs legislation vente libre artane suisse acheter oxytrol livraison 48h chrono 2 achat en ligne de finast benadryl sirop nom gĂ©nĂ©rique acheter naprosyn en pharmacie forum levitra 5 mg par jour achat bactroban pharmacie sans ordonnance vente zyprexa neuroleptique naturel acheter tinidazole 500 mg comprimĂ©s acheter paroxetine en ligne jeux multijoueurs aciclovir pas cher marques pages vente prevacid en ligne france gĂ©nĂ©rique synthroid abbott mĂ©dicament cozaar gĂ©nĂ©rique singulair 20 mg dose achat allegra generique gĂ©nĂ©rique voltaren 1 gel difference entre le viagra et le cialis vente vermox sans ordonnance en pharmacie vente betnovate vasotec pas cher voyages levitra coĂ»t vs viagra des coĂ»ts cymbalta et jambes sans repos des noms gĂ©nĂ©riques pour alesse contrĂŽle des naissances achat cymbalta en belgique voltaren gel et soleil achat zyprexa en ligne effet secondaire lasix vente strattera espagne vente etodolac peut lipitor gĂ©nĂ©rique la cause du diabĂšte viagra canada prescription acheter prandin 100mg prix augmentin offre 1000 mg ekƟi sözlĂŒk celebrex autorisation prise cytotec pour ivg acheter aspirin pfizer lynoral pas cher maroc carte achat en ligne imuran precaution acheter ranitidine forum discussion achat en ligne augmentin generic hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg la perte de poids plavix plaquettes sanguines prix du levitra en inde coĂ»t benicar sans assurance acheter cytotec sur internet en suisse acheter propecia en france l'ecole est obligatoire a quel age acheter penegra pharmacie en ligne clomid pour l'homme acheter detrol en pharmacie forum achat trazodone en ligne avis gĂ©nĂ©rique viagra sans ordonnance ashwagandha pas cher livraison rapide colis sarafem pas cher avion disparu achat micardis une femme enceinte peut prendre augmentin vente citalopram vidal associates zenegra pas cher vol acheter azulfidine pfizer belgique sumycin pas cher voyage vente zantac pour bebe anafranil photosensibilisation viagra pour homme au maroc costco prilosec coupon fluoxetine 20 mg drug facts tegretol vente libre suisse acheter fluoxetine pas cher et rapide achat prednisolone 20mg sandoz wellbutrin 150 mg et perte de poids metformin hcl 500 mg teva acheter ampicillin sans ordonnance en belgique levlen pas cher vol algerie erythromycin 500mg vidipha achat en ligne bactroban pommade biafine vente metoclopramide hcl lyon vente motrin belgique finpecia pas cher france canada hockey provera pas cher en ligne jeux multijoueurs combien est viagra gĂ©nĂ©rique au canada yasmin pas chere voyage midamor pas cher indemnisation coĂ»t de viagra tesco augmentin et yaourt forum achat phexin en ligne vente oxytrol en ligne achat lasix pas cher en belgique pasteque et le viagra sinemet pas cher france canada direct gĂ©nĂ©rique viagra faible coĂ»t risque avec le viagra orlistat prix walmart propranolol pas cher vols alesse pour l'acnĂ© vente confido gĂ©nĂ©rique achat geriforte en france et sans ordonnance tamoxifen citrate 20mg utilise acheter vasodilan forum discussion propranolol avec ou sans ordonnance trazodone hcl 50mg examens bactrim ds 180 mg achat pyridium en ligne paypal arret depakote et perte de poids lipitor pas cher marques vĂȘtements achat en ligne bupropion lp achat emsam en ligne canadien de la pharmacie prilosec vente atrovent en france acheter betapace en ligne par virement bancaire achat en ligne diflucan 200mg effets secondaires paroxetine hcl 20 mg achat en ligne periactin prix nobel levlen pas chers du tout synthroid generique pas cher en france achat en ligne flonase generique comment diminuer celexa 40 mg vente de prandin pas cher forum vente zyprexa velotab 5 mg quesque le medicament cytotec medicamento seroquel 50 mg augmentin provoque mycose ou acheter cytotec au maroc furosemide pas cher marocain acheter aciclovir sans ordonnance en pharmacie acheter kamagra en amsterdam acheter kamagra uk paypal pyridium pas cher en ligne ma banque ca-languedoc traitement sous clomid et ovitrelle vente libre finax espagne vente de precose en france acheter trazodone libido max chute cheveux finasteride acheter viramune sans ordonnance en espagne cozaar 50 mg cena vente plendil sans ordonnance en pharmacie wellbutrin 150 mg bid acheter lexapro pfizer france fincar vente libre pharmacie suisse acheter alavert achat en ligne brahmi plante grimpante hoodia pas cher forum wawa depakote gĂ©nĂ©rique vs marque vente omnicef suisse vente libre achat lasix 40 vente vermox achat en ligne fosamax douleurs articulaires et musculaires erythromycin pas cher forum auto generique shatavari pas cher en france nizoral pas cher maroc hĂ©bdo grossesse sous zyprexa 5 mg lariam pas cheres tfc achat en ligne paroxetine quebec achat actonel en belgique lipitor prix par pilule lisinopril mylan gĂ©nĂ©riques direccion cipro guillot acheter keflex pas cher en ligne flagyl et test de grossesse acheter amoxil sur internet forum acheter du zantac en ligne vente apcalis sx jelly diovan hct prix de dĂ©tail achat keftab gĂ©nĂ©rique en france vente libre viagra pharmacie zyprexa et anorexie mentale combien de temps le cytotec fait effet ce n'augmentin pilules ressembler Ă  acheter kamagra sur internet aide pour l'achat bystolic acheter prazosin 100mg pfizer achat promethazine en france livraison rapide inderal pas chere chaussure achat astelin gĂ©nĂ©rique en ligne zyprexa velotabs 5mg vrai antivert pas cher forum fabriquer du viagra maison voltaren 25 mg k celebrex pas cher inde vente altace prix achat diovan 100mg lincocin pas cher avion disparu ne gĂ©nĂ©rique accutane travail achat zebeta pharmacie france nimotop pas cher paris lamisil pas cher marques chaussures acheter cefadroxil posologie spasfon achat chloromycetin en ligne pas cher glycomet comprimĂ© de 500 mg acheter lanoxin en ligne forum achat en ligne indinavir quebecor reminyl pas cher livraison rapide a domicile vente pilex prix tinidazole pas chers est gĂ©nĂ©rique cialis ok achat en ligne celebrex comparaison generique ditropan pas cher en france prix tamoxifen de l'inde costco singulair prix viagra 100 mg oder levitra 20mg achat buspar posologie cĂ©lestĂšne acheter du clomid pas chere lexapro 20 mg nausĂ©es neurontin sevrage alcoolique peut on acheter du colchicine en pharmacie zofran pas cher maroc tĂ©lĂ©com jumeaux avec clomid 50 mg achat actonel belgique vente libre keflex 500 mg par voie orale capsule vente phenergan generique cialis pas cher pharmacie paris 15 achat en ligne ampicillin quebec lipitor ventes annuelles intoxication mĂ©dicamenteuse tegretol acheter pariet sur internet prednisolone mylan effets indĂ©sirables forum acheter gyne-lotrimin sans ordonnance zyban le prix achat alavert en ligne crestor 10 mg indication viagra gĂ©nĂ©rique blague femara pas cher en ligne jeux d'action gĂ©nĂ©rique finasteride 1mg acheter canada cialis pharmacie en ligne calan pas cher avion.fr ethionamide pas cher forum hardware achat en ligne ethionamide comparaison celebrex coĂ»t Ă  Ă©tats-unis achat en ligne avodart psaumes comment prendre le clomid pour tomber enceinte hydrea medicament dangereux ndc nombre de depo provera 150 mg ciprofloxacin 500mg de l'alcool lamisil pour les ongles doxycycline 100mg forte zetia pas cher forum wawa ashwagandha pas chers acheter du trental pfizer para quĂ© servir lexapro 20mg desyrel pas cher combien lisinopril 10 mg coĂ»t pletal pas cher en ligne jeux d'action achat micardis plus 80 12.5mg acheter du finax pas cher paris le plus bas prix cymbalta gĂ©nĂ©rique valtrex acheter achat stromectol en suisse magasin de meubles lacs italiens achat florinef pharmacie belgique efficacitĂ© propecia generique acheter du oxytrol pas cher vente atarax en ligne france doxycycline effets secondaires des pilules de contrĂŽle des naissances achat en ligne de acticin pour comment eviter les effets secondaires du viagra lamisil vente libre quebec achat zetia en ligne avis achat tenormin generique en france achat en ligne lexapro pas cher provera 10 mg et alcool achat pyridium en suisse romande rocaltrol pas cher avion papier puis-je prendre 2 singulair 10mg acheter sinequanon le gain de poids de 25 mg de zoloft flagyl er pas cher france canada streaming acheter abana sur internet explorer viagra oĂč acheter en australie achat en ligne dostinex pas cher vente isoniazid vrai vantin pas cher en france cialis pharmacie en ligne en inde peut on couper un comprimĂ© de cialis acheter noroxin livraison 48h chrono friche phenergan pas cher en ligne jeux d'action cialis 20mg pharmacie en ligne achat prevacid livraison rapide a domicile achat tadacip belgique vente libre peut on acheter du cytoxan en pharmacie sans ordonnance effet indĂ©sirable du micardis acheter micardis 40 mg comment commander plavix en ligne rue prix du viagra 100mg abilify et impuissance achat en ligne tofranil achat zyban gĂ©nĂ©rique prix prise de poids avec dulcolax plavix pas cher achat en ligne trileptal 300 film combien coumadin coĂ»t achat avalide gĂ©nĂ©rique en belgique achat en ligne de sinequan pfizer utilite du clomid achat en ligne alesse quebec ampicillin pas cher indeed vente strattera en espagne vente cialis en ligne france achat en ligne vasodilan quebecoise achat en ligne de diovan pour acheter metoclopramide en ligne avis douleur bas du ventre clomid achat en ligne betnovate crĂȘme anglaise acheter allopurinol posologie maxilase acheter du endep en belgique sans ordonnance acheter albenza 100mg pfizer voveran pas cher marques pages achat furosemide en ligne belgique casodex pas cher livraison gratuite est lamotrigine lamictal gĂ©nĂ©rique pour vente atarax pas cher ventolin coupons de rĂ©duction avapro pas cher maroc torrent achat en ligne avodart psa peugeot achat ventolin pas cher 30 livre sur 4 jr naturelles pilules comme viagra zyprexa pas cher vol algerie vente dapoxetine belgique pharmacie commandant cialis canada dapoxetine en pharmacie en malaisie acheter lasix pas cher trental pas cher france canada resultat achat en ligne buspar 1mg finasteride effets secondaires acheter bactrim en ligne forum viagra pour soirĂ©e finasteride 1 mg pharmacie canadienne effexor et wellbutrin ensemble vente neurontin sevrage tabac effexor 150 mg reviews ce n'zoloft coĂ»t austell ciprofloxacin 500mg achat en ligne flagyl eragon film ranitidine 150 mg utilisation Ă  long terme achat aristocort en pharmacie acheter etodolac pharmacie metformin prix par pilule 80 mg propranolol effets secondaires lexapro trouble d'anxiĂ©tĂ© sociale achat femcare en suisse lasix pas cher marques vĂȘtements trazodone pas cher en ligne de mire acheter du etodolac en ligne achat en ligne arava quebec remeron et alcool augmentin classe antibiotique avortement par cytotec 200 trandate intraveineux combien gĂ©nĂ©rique diovan coĂ»t lopid pas cher sans ordonnance exelon pas cher france canada 2015 viagra pas cher indesign combien est de 10 mg de lipitor acheter hytrin sans ordonnance en pharmacie vente raclette allegra beauty vente requip effets achat levothroid en suisse romande accutane 20mg journal seroquel et chaleur vente sinequan sans ordonnance pharmacie micardis comparaison des coĂ»ts de vente trileptal vidal.fr vente erythromycin difference speman pas cher en ligne jeux d'action achat naprosyn pharmacie acheter benicar en france paxil pas cher livraison rapide colis premarin comprimĂ© prix probalan pas cher inde achat famvir pfizer en ligne augmentin pour soigner une angine a quoi sert le mĂ©dicament prednisolone acheter abana pfizer en ligne bupropion xl gĂ©nĂ©rique marques le glucophage pour maigrir vente minocin pas cher achat de benicar en ligne prednisolone winthrop 20 mg comprimĂ© orodispersible ic ciprofloxacin hcl 500 mg buspar pas cher avion pas crestor et citron thuoc ventolin 2mg acheter fluoxetine en ligne pour l'emploi coĂ»t de neurontin Ă  costco vente cefixime biogaran gĂ©nĂ©riques metformin pas cher en ligne irantv zithromax posologie coqueluche peut acheter tetracycline sans ordonnance diltiazem hcl er 240 mg vrai doxazosin pas cher en france achat en ligne ciplox achat bupropion 150 mg sr onglet acheter carbozyne en ligne canada ginseng inde pas cher traitement par zyprexa achat dilantin gĂ©nĂ©rique tinidazole 300 mg utilise cytotec et bain effets indĂ©sirables neurontin achat en ligne augmentin 1g dosage vente du aspirin en pharmacie acheter Ă  bas prix viagra en usa doxycycline 100mg hyc prix acheter himcocid sans ordonnance en pharmacie vente flonase france ou assimilĂ© zyban inde pas cher est commande cialis en ligne juridique achat en ligne epivir-hbv quebec team acheter dipyridamole en belgique viagra et impuissance vente clozaril sans ordonnance femara et ostĂ©oporose achat synthroid pas cher effet acheter saw palmetto generique pas cher achat en ligne exelon novartis recrutement acheter sumycin feminin achat azulfidine belgique vente libre suhagra pas chers acheter betapace gĂ©nĂ©rique en pharmacie combien de temps effet zoloft neurontin guillain-barre syndrome vente lisinopril comparaison coĂ»t de clomid canada cymbalta duree de vie achat luvox pharmacie acheter du motrin pas cher forum achat roxithromycin pfizer achat aciphex en ligne en france cialis 20mg von lilly effexor effets secondaires long terme motrin coupon canada 2012 commander clomid en ligne zyprexa canadian pharmacy achat en ligne de femcare prix bupropion 75 mg de haut vente lynoral generique achat en ligne antivert pas cher effets secondaire du micardis qu'est-ce que la doxycycline mono 100mg cap acheter du viagra pas cher arreter propecia viagra coĂ»t en nouvelle-zĂ©lande achat en ligne bupron srlf flashconfs achat hytrin gĂ©nĂ©rique en belgique achat en ligne amaryl 2mg/500mg effexor durĂ©e effets secondaires achat prilosec pas cher 30 livre sur 4 jr achat calan en pharmacie sans ordonnance acheter venlor sur internet en suisse prednisolone effets secondaires chez le chien zetia 10 mg comprimĂ©s effets secondaires paroxetine hydrochloride 20 mg vs xanax acheter avapro en pharmacie sans ordonnance viagra gĂ©nĂ©rique de l'entreprise vente de duphalac generique achat indocin combien de zoloft pilules prend-il pour prendre de la hauteur kamagra livraison rapide forum achat en ligne de glucophage gĂ©nĂ©rique crestor et fertilitĂ© achat finast pharmacie acheter glycomet en france pas cher strattera pas chere cuisine effets secondaires du plavix quel est le nom gĂ©nĂ©rique ciprofloxacin cafergot pas cher en ligne de mire acheter du compazine pas cher paris nexium pas cher index
 
Common Law Review
 
Domù arrow Èlánky arrow Issue 8 - Contract Law arrow 13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration
13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration PDF Tisk E-mail

When values change

Re-negotiating Consideration

Tereza Šimanovská

 

1. Introduction

Throughout history, a number of common law doctrines have developed to determine whether a contract was validly concluded and whether it is enforceable in law. One such doctrine is the need for a contract to be supported by consideration.

The basic idea behind the doctrine of consideration is reciprocity – i.e. a person should not be allowed to enforce another”s promise unless he or she has given or promised to give something in exchange for that promise.1 In essence, consideration is the “value” or “price” that one contributes towards a bargain.

Consideration must also be provided when modifying a contract. This rule of the orthodox doctrine of consideration has recently undergone a very significant change and it may have cast doubt on the future of consideration itself. The issue concerns the nature of consideration upon the variation or re-negotiation of a contract and, more specifically, when one party is promised additional money to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation.

 

2. Re-negotiation of a contract – Need for fresh consideration

Until recently it was well-established that performance of a pre-existing contractual duty owed to the other contractual party could not amount to good consideration. In plain words, when someone merely performs what he was already bound to do, such performance is not good consideration to enforce a promise of extra money. He did not provide anything additional – he did not provide any consideration for the extra money paid by the other party. It can be said that the promisee does “the same for more”.2

In reality, however, contractual renegotiations are commonplace in the daily commercial practice of almost all industries: whilst performing a previously-concluded contract, circumstances may arise which force the parties to renegotiate their agreement and alter the original price. Indeed, it seems rather unfair to deny the parties such a possibility.

When parties decide to modify a contract they should bear in mind that, just as consideration was necessary to create the original contract, “fresh” consideration is required to effect a valid modification of that original contract. There are two ways to ensure that a promise for extra money is enforceable. Either one party does something “more” than was required by the original agreement or that original agreement is discharged by both parties and a new agreement concluded.3 Traditionally, the courts have been unwilling to imply that an original agreement was “torn up” and a new one concluded – this is a conclusion they are willing to reach only where the evidence clearly supports such a finding. Regardless of how artificial these two ways may appear, if the parties wish to alter the price stipulated in the original contract, they should ensure there is fresh consideration for the promise of such additional money.

3. Traditional doctrine of Stilk v Myrick

This aspect of the consideration doctrine originates from the case of Stilk v Myrick.4 Myrick was a captain on a ship who employed Stilk to work on a Baltic Sea voyage. During the voyage two members of the crew deserted and the master promised that the remaining sailors could share the deserters” wages amongst themselves if they sailed the ship back home. Upon arrival at the dock, the master refused to honour that promise and Stilk sued for the sum. His claim failed.

When explaining the grounds upon which the judgment was decided, it must be emphasised that this case was published in two separate law reports, both of which offered different ratios. Nevertheless, Campbell”s report has generally been considered correct, and its ratio accepted as the precedent governing this area of law.5 The main reason it gives for the failure of Stilk”s claim is that the agreement lacked consideration. The sailors were not entitled to the additional payment because they merely did what they were obliged to do by virtue of their original contract. They provided no new consideration for the captain”s promise of extra money.

The other source, the Espinasse report, says that the main reason for the result was public policy. It was undesirable that it should be open to the sailors in the future to exercise improper pressure on their master to increase their wages. This report makes no reference to the fact that lack of consideration would bar the claim, and instead focuses on the need to avoid what would in modern law be referred to as economic duress.6 Economic duress exists when one party illegitimately abuses his or her superior economic power to coerce the other party into agreeing to a particular set of terms.7 A contract entered into under economic duress is voidable and may be set aside by the court.8

In any case, it has always been the first report that was applied. The rule about the existing duty laid by the Campbell report was followed many times afterwards,9 but has always been somewhat controversial. It simply does not seem fair that a party can breach his or her promise and get away with it, even if the other party acted upon that promise in good faith.

There have been some voices criticising this rule. For example, Lord Denning tried to escape it because it can often lead to unfair results. He stated in Ward v Byham10 that “a promise to perform an existing duty,11 or the performance of it, should be regarded as good consideration, because it is a benefit to the person to whom it is given.” The promisor in fact benefited from the situation – he obtained “factual benefit”.12

Nevertheless, most of the judiciary were not willing to come to such radical conclusions. In Ward v Byham the remaining judges expressly refused Lord Denning”s revolutionary proposition. Throughout history, rather than going against the traditional doctrine, courts were often ready to find consideration even where one could say that there was none to be found. Sometimes it is said that courts “invented consideration” to abide by the orthodox doctrine.13

4. Revolution against the old approach: No legal benefit necessary

The controversial case of Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd.14 might be labelled as falling into this category. This decision has dramatically changed the traditional doctrine regarding pre-existing contractual duty and has cast great uncertainty over the future development of consideration in this area.

 

4.1 Williams v Roffey

The Roffey Brothers were builders who contracted with a housing association to refurbish a block of 27 flats. They sub-contracted the carpentry work to Williams for £20,000. Williams got into financial difficulties and it was apparent that he might not be able to complete the work on time. It was mainly because Wiliams had underpriced his contract. The second reason was deficiency in William”s supervision of his workers. Roffey Bros. became worried that they would be liable under a penalty clause in their main contract and promised Williams an additional sum of £10,300. This was to be paid at the rate of £575 per flat on completion. Williams finished eight more flats but only received £1,500. Williams ultimately sued Roffey Bros. for the remaining sum.

The main issue before the Court of Appeals was whether Williams provided consideration for the additional £10,300 promised by Roffey Bros. The court held that the agreement to pay the extra money was enforceable. This came as a great surprise. It defied the traditional rule set out in Stilk v Myrick. What was the consideration provided by Williams? He only did the work that he was bound to do by his original agreement – he only performed a duty already owed to Roffey.

 

4.2 New form of consideration: Practical benefit

In Williams v. Roffey, the court found valid consideration in the practical benefit that Roffey obtained by his agreement with Williams. So far the practical/factual benefit (Denning) has been refused as good consideration. The argument has always been that consideration must be something of value in the eyes of law – something that provides or brings about a legal benefit.

What was this practical benefit? It consisted of a number of factors. The court held that it was the fact that Williams continued his work and did not breach the sub-contract. Therefore, Roffey avoided the trouble of looking for somebody else to complete the work. Furthermore, Roffey avoided the penalty payment for the delay under the main contract. Also, by directing the claimant to complete one flat at a time, the defendant was able to organize their work with other subcontractors in a more efficient manner. It is clear that the logic of “factual benefit” earlier argued by Lord Denning was applied here. Even though there was no legal benefit to Roffey, the contractual modification, in fact, benefited Roffey.

It is questionable whether this reasoning about “practical benefits” is persuasive enough to disregard the need for a legal benefit and change this rule in such a dramatic way. When looking at each of the “practical benefits”, one realizes that they do not consist of anything additional. Roffey would have received all of these benefits under the original contract, even if it were not modified. In fact, all of these new “advantages” were the very reason why they concluded the original contract. Williams was hired as the subcontractor to do the work. Therefore, the main purpose here was not to look for anyone else to do the job. Similarly, the fact that Roffey did not have to pay the penalty because the plaintiff continued the work was the very reason that a subcontractor would have been hired initially. The question is: how can this count as a fresh consideration? Was this not yet another “invented consideration” by the courts?

 

4.3 Practical benefit justified by commercial reality

On the other hand, it can be argued that this pragmatic decision finally concedes what can be called “commercial reality”. After all, it is a common practice in the building industry for the main contractor to increase sub-contractors” payments if the parties see that the price is too low. As the counsel for the plaintiff argued, “It would be unfortunate if English law deprived an acceptable commercial practice, which both parties regard as beneficial, of legal effect.” Thus, the court should look at the situation as it stands and acknowledge what in fact is beneficial for the parties, as opposed to seeking a theoretical “legal benefit”. The preference should be given to what the actual intention of the parties was when renegotiating the contract, so that their intended agreement is given effect. Would it not be unfair to negate their clear arrangement that was entered into voluntarily? Russel LJ said: “Consideration there must be but courts should be more ready to find its existence as to reflect the intention of the parties.”

Obviously, there are two competing principles to be weighed regarding the doctrine of consideration. It can be said that modifications are in the public interest and both parties should be encouraged to bargain their way out of an unanticipated difficulty. On the other hand, it is also desirable to hold parties to the contractual terms of their bargain.15 Clearly, there are pros and cons to each of the two conflicting interests.

 

5. Potential escape from a contract as a value?

Another issue should be contemplated in this area. It was said that Williams suffered a detriment by continuing the work and not breaching the contract. His counsel argued “he (Williams) might have been better off by breaking the contract, getting higher paid work elsewhere and paying such damages as the contractor can recover against him”.16 Can this constitute good consideration? Can this be anything of value in the eyes of law? This proposition seems to undermine the sanctity of contracts. It is an old principle of law that people should be held to their bargains – Pacta sunt servanda. Therefore, the legal practice should promote this principle and not acknowledge that a threatened breach of contract is a viable basis for finding consideration. Such reasoning does not seem correct as a part of legal practice.

Threatening with breach of contract to increase the agreed price is indeed walking on thin ice. As mentioned above, agreements that are achieved by illegitimate pressure exercised by the party with greater economic power can be set aside on the grounds of economic duress.17 It was very important that in Williams v Roffey duress was not established on the facts of the case. The main reason that the judgment was given for Williams was almost certainly because duress was not involved. Roffey called for the meeting because it was obvious that the work would not be finished as planned. Williams did not explicitly threaten with breach of contract.

 

6. Consequences of the new approach to consideration

Undoubtedly, Williams v Roffey significantly widened the scope of the doctrine of consideration. Promises to perform existing duties can now be good consideration when they lead to practical benefit. As the doctrine of duress is a relatively new concept (first acknowledged in 1976), in the past, courts used consideration in situations that would nowadays be judged in terms of duress. In situations like those in Stilk v Myrick, the judge could not avail himself of economic duress and instead used lack of consideration as the reason for his judgment. Thus, a case like Stilk would be decided differently today. Most likely, it would be brought as a duress case and not necessarily fail for lack of consideration. It could be stated that the Court of Appeals followed the reasoning from the Espinasse report.18

 

6.1 Reconciliation of Stilk v Myrick and Williams v Roffey

It would seem that Williams v Roffey overruled Stilk v Myrick, but the court emphasized that Stilk still remains good law and distinguished Williams v Roffey. Glidwell LJ said that Williams v Roffey does not contravene the principles from Stilk, but that it “refines and limits” the application of them. However, it is not wholly clear from the judgment on what basis the court arrived at this conclusion. The judges argued that the rigid approach to consideration in Stilk was only a product of the special conditions of the seafare in the 18th century, and that it was too harsh to exist without changes in the modern day. However, the two cases are very similar. Myrick also obtained practical benefit because the sailors continued performance of their contract. Furthermore, Williams v Roffey was later applied in an employment case19 where it was held that when an employee”s wage is increased, sufficient consideration for the increase is the fact that the employee continues his or her work and does not try to bargain for more money.20 Is this not exactly the same situation as in Stilk?

Even if the court was so resolute that Stilk has not been overruled, it seems difficult to defend this idea for much longer. The conclusion could be drawn that the only principle that has survived the attack of Williams v Roffey is that consideration is still required when modifying a contract, while Stilk has been overruled as to what counts as fresh consideration.21

6.2 Application in day-to-day business

It is without a doubt that “practical benefit” is now a recognized category that can be used in practice to establish consideration. Lawyers arguing enforcement of promises for extra payment when the consideration is of doubtful value should avail themselves of “practical benefit” and argue that effect should be given to “commercial reality.” Furthermore, lawyers should argue that it is in the interest of the parties to reach a viable solution that is acceptable to everyone. It is, after all, in the public interest to bargain one”s way out of a stalemate rather than end up in a costly litigation process.

On the other hand, it has become more difficult for the opposing party to attack such contractual modifications because it is no longer so simple to plead lack of consideration where some sort of benefit can be found. It should be argued that there is no legal or practical benefit, and therefore no consideration. The security of contracts should be emphasized – people should get what they bargain for and not be pushed to pay more if difficulties arise. Any sign of duress makes such modification unenforceable. Therefore, one should always look at the process of renegotiation. Simply, was there any sign of improper pressure from the party who was in the stronger contractual position? If so, economic duress should be pleaded as a vitiating factor to the promise.

Williams v Roffey has since been applied in two cases,22 both dealing with renegotiation of commercial contracts. In each case it was held that consideration lay in the “practical benefit” that one party obtained because the other party did not breach the contract and continued its performance.23

 

7. Conclusion: What is the future of consideration?

A new liberal approach has been set. Courts are now more willing to find consideration just to give effect to what they perceive as the actual intent of the parties. This tolerant attitude is counter-balanced by the use of duress as the tool to limit bargains that have been achieved by improper means. The issue is whether this situation is wholly satisfactory. Courts have not been clear enough about the future application of this new approach, and it is evident that the doctrine of consideration in this area has been plunged into confusion.

These reflections might lead to a more revolutionary interpretation of Williams v Roffey. Is there really a need for consideration when varying a contract? American law, for example, does not require it.24 Maybe it is finally time to stop being too afraid of changes and to move ahead. After all, is this not the real unexpressed meaning of Williams v Roffey? It seems that law would become more efficient without the formalistic burden of consideration when modifying a contract.

Reflections about contractual modifications might logically lead us even further. Is consideration necessary at all? It appears that consideration as a principle is still adhered to, but this effort has become somewhat forced. The civil law system can do well without consideration. There exists an increasing hostility towards the old doctrine. It has become more of a technical obstacle than a useful and essential tool. Maybe the modern law should finally get rid of this ancient principle and replace it with more effective doctrines.

Were the judges too afraid to explicitly admit that Williams v Roffey might be the beginning of the end of consideration?

Tereza Šimanovská is a second-year law student at the Faculty of Law, Charles University in Prague. She has spent one year in London, where she studied at the Faculty of Law at the University of Westminster.

 

 

 

Bibliography


Atiyah P S, Essays on Contract, 1st Edition, Reprinted (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2001)


Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005)


McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005)


Noble M, For Your Consideration, November 8 1991, New Law Journal, Butterworth &Co (Publishers) Ltd


Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005)


Treitel G, Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2002)

 

 

...................

1 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 85

2 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp147

3 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 96

4 Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Camp 317 and 6 Esp 129

5 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 95

6 Ibid

7 Ibid pp 358

8 Nevertheless, there is no evidence that the sailors in Stilk v Myrick actually used any pressure to get the extra money. On the contract, it was Myrick himself who promised the increase of wages because he needed to get the ship home. Thus, whilst no actual duress was proved in this, the decision aimed to pre-emptively prevent such situations occurring in the future.

9 For example Atlas Express v Kafco [1989] QB 833

10 Ward v Byham [1956] 1 WLR 496

11 However, here Lord Denning was concerned with a pre-existing duty deriving from public law, not a duty owed under a contract.

12 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp 145

13 Prof Treitel as cited in McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 86

14 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

15 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 99

16 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

17 However, a distinction should be made between threats of breach of contract that amount to economic duress and behaviour that only amounts to acceptable commercial pressure. It should be highlighted that at the moment the law is not very clear about where the exact borderline lays. It seems that not all threats of breach of contract are automatically illegal.

18 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 100

19 Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications [1993] IRLR 383

20 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

21 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp153

22 Anangel Atlas Compania Naviera SA v Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co Ltd (no 2) [1990] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 526; Simon Container Machinery Ltd v Emba Machinery AB [1998] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 429

23 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

24 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 102.

 
< Pűedch.   Další >