Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/php-tmp/upload) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 348

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/cz/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/webs/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361

Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/local/www/wp-config.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT) in /usr/local/www/webs/cz/society/review/templates/infinitelysimple/index.php(28) : eval()'d code(1) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code on line 361
glucophage xr 500mg perte de poids version générique pour advair acheter venlor sur internet regarder télévision achat nizoral en france rapide trandate pas cher forum des générique motrin femme prend viagra vente detrol en ligne france pamelor pas cher avion playmobil comment utiliser du kamagra toradol pas cher france canada 2015 ashwagandha pas cher france canada foot feminin achat en ligne biaxin antibiotique vente de desyrel en france hyzaar pas cher forum hardware doxycycline achat en ligne prednisone et retention d'eau acheter aleve pharmacie en ligne ovulation avec serophene achat de dilantin en france ciprofloxacin diarrhée du voyageur zovirax oculaire achat prednisone en ligne forum achat lamictal générique en france acheter keflex forum avis vente ampicillin en tunisie tegretol pas cher maroczik pas de regles quand prendre clomid acheter alavert sur internet regarder télévision cialis generico forum commande viagra en ligne france achat en ligne de buspar pour vente norvasc levitra diamox effets indésirables vente confido suisse esidrex 25 mg d'hydrochlorothiazide norvasc 5 mg reactii indésirables acheter du viagra en liège achat en ligne de nootropil pour achat de calan pfizer achat xeloda forum zyprexa 10 mg comprimé d'image absence de glaire avec clomid achat phenergan générique en ligne difference entre le viagra et le levitra sumycin pas cher voyage vente celadrine médicament plavix effets secondaires acheter lasix sans ordonnance achat lamisil acheter ceftin en ligne avis pyridium pas cher en ligne ma banque ca-languedoc vente femcare en ligne achat en ligne baclofen vente tulasi pas chers clonidine pas cher livraison rapide a domicile duphaston clomid traitement prednisolone 20mg effet secondaire orlistat c'est quoi achat suhagra en france livraison rapide accutane avant apres vente triamterene générique vente zyrtec en pharmacie achat aleve pfizer vrai dipyridamole pas cher paris micardis et alcool achat en ligne unisom achat achat en ligne chloramphenicol sigma makeup cymbalta maux de tete zocor effets indésirables achat anacin canada acheter du nizagara en pharmacie sans ordonnance problèmes avec coreg générique micardis pas cher france canada hockey vente indinavir generique vente de prazosin pas cher vente celexa en ligne augmentin xr générique kytril pas cher maroczik reconnaitre faux cialis cytotec voie génitale achat en ligne luvox achat trandate vente roxithromycin en belgique acheter citalopram generique pas cher vente de anacin pfizer acheter du benzac en belgique générique pour les médicaments cymbalta le gain de poids de 25 mg de zoloft générique viagra sens achat aricept en pharmacie aygestin pas cher en pharmacie lariam générique achat actos acheter silagra pharmacie en ligne vente glycomet en france acheter topamax original prix acheter ranitidine mylancome quand cymbalta générique aller 2013 effets secondaires zyprexa velotab 10 mg fluoxetine pour le syndrome prémenstruel générique xenical (orlistat) 120 mg achat saw palmetto pas cher paris vente flagyl er comparaison cialis lilly pas cher personne 2,5 mg lexapro de chlorhydrate de bupropion xl 150 mg et alcool achat en ligne de acticin pour achat en ligne bupropion zyban effets 2 mg abilify critiques effets secondaires de paroxetine vente de nizoral pas cher en france cephalexin lupin 500 mg effets secondaires orlistat pas cher en ligne sur viber comment acheter plavix sans ordonnance peut on acheter du micardis en pharmacie sans ordonnance achat en ligne de ponstel pour ranitidine 150 mg utilisation à long terme prometrium pas cher en ligne sur viber clopidogrel formulaire remboursement acheter arimidex sur internet je suis en alerte vente de cyklokapron en pharmacie sûr de prendre viagra 150mg acheter levitra sur internet regarder télévision hydrea medicament dangereux arava doctissimo betnovate pas cher france canada resultat prise clomid mais enceinte avant augmentin 156 mg dose acheter ethionamide en pharmacie forum lipitor prix par pilule courbe plate sous clomid achat premarin effet indésirable augmentin bebe effet secondaires evista acheter zyvoxide produit meme effet que le viagra propranolol er 80 mg migraine depakote er générique coût avalide pas cher indexnikah levlen pas cher vol algerie minocycline pas cher en ligne jeux multijoueurs coût cialis viagra acheter urispas sur internet forum serpina pas cher livraison rapide fleurs vente pyridium generic levitra 10 mg 4 cp pro vente de prandin pas cher forum peut acheter vasotec sans ordonnance guillaume de calan achat en ligne de digoxin générique levlen pas chers du tout acheter glycomet en france pas cher ventolin inhalateur coût faut il ordonnance pour cialis vrai proscar pas cher forum generique erexor pas cher vente de viagra et cialis vente de erexin-v pas chere stromectol fait effet combien de temps vente appartement calanques marseille metformine er 500mg quand prendre minomycin pas cher paris nice cymbalta 30 mg ne ilacıdır vente de danazol generique achat en ligne oxytrol bourges centre 90 mg armour synthroid équivalent nom générique pour claritin d topamax pas cher france canada foot feminin achat en ligne noroxine costco pharmacie plavix lioresal pas cher avion corée générique tricor prix acheter amaryl pas cher et rapide achat fertomid belgique acheter avodart pfizer sans ordonnance acheter alesse sur internet explorer singulair prix le plus bas vrai aristocort pas cher paris escitalopram teva 10 mg cena protonix ec 40 mg achat sumycin paris costco prix en pharmacie propecia rue prix du viagra 100mg vente atorlip-10 levitra zithromax posologie coqueluche où puis-je acheter dramamine pour les chiens acheter du viagra en belgique methotrexate acide folique ou folinique achat en ligne exelon novartis recrutement achat periactin en suisse résultat des elections en françe associer priligy et cialis achat strattera en pharmacie sans ordonnance viagra coût en nouvelle-zélande acheter lamisil pilules canada achat eulexin en ligne en france urispas pas cher forum doctissimo zanaflex 4 mg de dosage vrai lasix pas cher provera marne la vallée achat en ligne zyprexa velotab 15mg acheter xalatan ligne forum uroxatral pas cher maroc torrent achat en ligne finast vente acheter lotrisone ligne forum où puis-je commander periactin en ligne trimox pas cher france canada foot feminin imitrex pas cher france canada foot feminin himplasia pas cher avion télécommandé vente evista biphosphonate perfusion keflex pas cher france canada foot feminin achat en ligne prednisone quebec achat saw palmetto acnease achat viagra paris actavis bupropion xl 150 mg achat zyban en ligne belgique acheter paxil ligne forum le métronidazole ou tinidazole) pilules plavix et estomac buspar pas cher avion.fr acheter proventil feminin vente geriforte belgique pharmacie finpecia pas cher france canada hockey la fin de l'ovulation sur clomid 50mg clomid 100mg sopk acheter maxalt livraison 48h chrono peugeot beaucoup ne clopidogrel royaume-uni coût zyprexa drogue dure achat cialis original en france à l'heure allemande arte vente desyrel en belgique vente de cipro pas cher paris mangue et coumadin viagra pas cher en ligne achat entocort pharmacie belge acheter elimite livraison 48h chrono effets secondaires risperdal 25 mg achat trazodone en ligne avis prix du moduretic jumeaux avec clomid 50 mg achat lynoral générique en france vente trental indication pradaxa effexor effets secondaires long terme enceinte sur clomid 50mg achat en ligne bupropion lpg acheter proscar sans ordonnance en espagne vente fucidin generique vente tegretol en france achat en ligne tetracycline posologie euphytose albendazole pas cher avion corée dramamine pas cher voyage achat augmentin 1g sachet le médicament zyrtec ponstel pas cher en france où acheter tretinoin gel en ligne acheter silagra en ligne sur viber vrai albenza pas cher en france acheter fluoxetine livraison 48h chrono 2 achat en ligne shallaki generique combien de temps effet zoloft achat en ligne de ophthacare masculin royaume-uni cialis générique en ligne achat en ligne paxil progress provera pas cher paris nice vente de cholestoplex en france estrace crème générique disponible benadryl troubles du mouvement pourcentage reussite cytotec risperdal et fievre cat costa o pastila de cialis comment obtenir lamisil pilules achat urispas 100mg pfizer vrai danazol pas cher en france allegra générique d costco acheter benicar sur internet forum amitriptyline 25 mg indications ovulation de mauvaise qualité et clomid myambutol pas cher index risque arret risperdal zaditor pas chere pfizer générique advair 750 mg de metformine sopk vente chloramphenicol lipothin vente libre suisse cout boite viagra prix du viagra en france en pharmacie evista pas cher indemnités achat en ligne nizoral 200 mg vente forzest en ligne france acheter cymbalta effets indesirables acheter zestoretic sur internet achat en ligne penegra generic achat albenza en suisse ou au surinam levlen pas cher indemnisation remeron pas cher forum construire vrai pletal pas cher forum traitement flagyl ovule achat en ligne claritin quebecoise de chlorhydrate de bupropion sr 150 mg achat zithromax en ligne achat en ligne clonidine acheter pariet en france livraison rapide achat cephalexin posologie maxilase va celebrex générique disponible annonce vente arava tunisie achat en ligne zyrtecset achat oxytrol en ligne forum erythromycin inde pas cher indocin pas cher forum downparadise acheter flagyl er en ligne canada estrace costco crise d'angoisse malgré effexor voveran pas cher ici mag achat lisinopril canada achat en ligne mentat vente walgreens accutane prix acheter nitrofurantoin en ligne finasteride propecia generico achat de cabgolin en france achat en ligne artane danger zyloprim pas cher en ligne sur viber des photos de pilules neurontin la garantie de livraison le lendemain kamagra doxycycline biogaran 50 mg comprimé pelliculé ce n'zocor 40 mg ressembler avis sur le cialis 10mg clonidine pas cher avion télécommandé vente de carbozyne pas cher paris est nexium otc la même que sur ordonnance posologie aciclovir crème finasteride perte de poids achat actos générique en belgique acheter altace en france pas cher bystolic pas cher maroc carte zovirax pommade et grossesse duphaston aspirin ceftin vente libre pharmacie suisse trandate pas cher achat atarax pas cher en france metformin kyste ovarien ranitidine mg par kg erythromycin 500 mg doziranje acheter omnicef sur internet sur l'internet trazodone pas cher en ligne de mire effet cialis sur femme acheter du viagra en malte sous clomid et provames crestor 5 mg en espanol ordonnance zoloft en ligne canada ciprofloxacin hexal 500 mg calan pas cher avion.fr vente allegra sans ordonnance en pharmacie c'est quoi le risperdal acheter atarax 25mg indications site serieux vente kamagra est cardizem générique les poissons mycin erythromycin 250 mg 60 comprimés vente minocycline lyme vrai carbozyne pas cher forum achat en ligne propranolol posologie ralista pas cher en ligne jeux gratuits zenegra pas cher marques chaussures achat differine en ligne ma banque ca-languedoc acheter tadacip en pharmacie forum acheter cabgolin feminin proscar pas cher en ligne ma banque ca-languedoc retard sous duphaston et clomid vente cozaar chine coût de depo provera en afrique du sud vente zetia achat lopressor générique en belgique achat lisinopril pas cher paris betnovate pas cher avion disparu achat florinef pharmacie belgique coût de prometrium 100mg puis-je prendre des pilules de régime avec cymbalta acheter phenergan avec de la codéine sirop en ligne acheter cardura sans ordonnance en belgique strattera 80 mg par rapport à adderall achat en ligne ceftin quebecos acheter du carbozyne pas cher sur internet achat en ligne styplon difference ne exelon ont un générique quelle est la forme générique de augmentin vente rosuvastatine vidal vente ranitidine mylan laboratoire acheter reminyl sur internet en suisse cytotec en pharmacie clics achat en ligne alesse 28 avril achat fluoxetine en ligne en france achat uroxatral en belgique lamisil comprimé avis ce qui est la doxycycline hyclate 100mg comprimés utilisés pour vrai zestoretic pas cher achat v-gel générique en belgique acheter saw palmetto pfizer belgique acheter torsemide sur internet sur l'internet infarctus du myocarde et cialis acheter anafranil pas cher sans ordonnance acheter voltaren gel de la nouvelle-zélande acheter moduretic posologie smecta acheter pamelor feminin peut acheter suprax sans ordonnance vente de skelaxin generique acheter serophene generique pas cher premarin pas cher forum voyage colospa pas chere achat estrace pas cher en belgique achat oxytrol pas cher 30 livre sur 4 jr vente chloramphenicol vidal acheter viagra le vrai generique anacin pas cher forum achat floxin en suisse résultat des elections en françe oxytrol pas cher france canada zithromax coût canada eurax pas cher marques houston achat en ligne flomax 0.4mg achat lioresal novartis plendil pas cheres tfc viagra sans avis medical celexa dosage pour le trouble panique lipitor effets secondaires trouble du sommeil tretinoin bnf vente sinequan en ligne france achat en ligne aldactone indication temporelle cleocin pas cher avion rafale lariam effets secondaires vente amaryl tunisie achat en ligne paxil progress optique démangeaisons après prise de stromectol zovirax pas cher inde singulair 20 mg dose achat en ligne zocor vidalonline ordonnance non nizoral cream achat en ligne fosamax comparaison celebrex pas cher france canada hockey acheter ranitidine forum discussion achat en ligne de estrace féminin vrai dramamine pas chere nolvadex comprimés 40mg des noms génériques pour alesse contrôle des naissances acheter aldactone en ligne upmc metoclopramide pas cher en ligne upmc achat allegra generique 30 mg cymbalta vs 60 mg acheter reminyl sur internet regarder télévision claritin 10 mg de gré à gré acheter ayurslim forum discussion acheter bupropion pfizer ranitidine 150 mg tablette bon site pour viagra acheter avodart pharmacie française barcelone effexor vente 2013 cialis at walmart pharmacy achat urispas livraison rapide a domicile viagra femme prix zyprexa 2 5 mg forum sotalol betapace 80 mg achat abana kastamonu roumanie toradol pas cher france canada coupe du monde acheter zoloft en ligne avis acheter du epivir-hbv en pharmacie sans ordonnance mircette pmdd acheter du amaryl en pharmacie en france xenical et thyroide dr mitry artane diltiazem pommade prix acheter menosan ligne forum traitement sous clomid et ovitrelle sinemet pas cher marques pas effets secondaires de isotretinoin capsules usp 10 mg tinidazole 500mg indication proventil pas cher forum auto achat levothroid generique en france achat en ligne aricept quebec team mécanisme d'action colchicine goutte enceinte premier mois sous clomid augmentin vidal effet secondaire acheter celadrin original prix vente probalan en pharmacie viagra feminin naturel achat viagra pas cher effet benfotiamine pas cher maroc peut on acheter du colchicine en pharmacie est de 200 mg de benadryl surdosage achat albendazole en ligne en france pouvez-vous acheter chloramphenicol gouttes auriculaires sur le comptoir acheter ophthacare en france livraison 48h chrono levothroid pas cher livraison rapide fleurs celexa et pilule contraceptive medicamentos crestor 10 mg probalan pas cher inde achat en ligne de dutas générique ville de calan plavix générique à partir du canada fluoxetine pas cher en ligne vente de shallaki en pharmacie acheter suhagra pas cher en ligne finasteride 5 mg uk acheter tetracyclines effets
 
Common Law Review
 
Domů arrow Články arrow Issue 8 - Contract Law arrow 13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration
13: Tereza Šimanovská - When values change: Re-negotiating Consideration PDF Tisk E-mail

When values change

Re-negotiating Consideration

Tereza Šimanovská

 

1. Introduction

Throughout history, a number of common law doctrines have developed to determine whether a contract was validly concluded and whether it is enforceable in law. One such doctrine is the need for a contract to be supported by consideration.

The basic idea behind the doctrine of consideration is reciprocity – i.e. a person should not be allowed to enforce another”s promise unless he or she has given or promised to give something in exchange for that promise.1 In essence, consideration is the “value” or “price” that one contributes towards a bargain.

Consideration must also be provided when modifying a contract. This rule of the orthodox doctrine of consideration has recently undergone a very significant change and it may have cast doubt on the future of consideration itself. The issue concerns the nature of consideration upon the variation or re-negotiation of a contract and, more specifically, when one party is promised additional money to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation.

 

2. Re-negotiation of a contract – Need for fresh consideration

Until recently it was well-established that performance of a pre-existing contractual duty owed to the other contractual party could not amount to good consideration. In plain words, when someone merely performs what he was already bound to do, such performance is not good consideration to enforce a promise of extra money. He did not provide anything additional – he did not provide any consideration for the extra money paid by the other party. It can be said that the promisee does “the same for more”.2

In reality, however, contractual renegotiations are commonplace in the daily commercial practice of almost all industries: whilst performing a previously-concluded contract, circumstances may arise which force the parties to renegotiate their agreement and alter the original price. Indeed, it seems rather unfair to deny the parties such a possibility.

When parties decide to modify a contract they should bear in mind that, just as consideration was necessary to create the original contract, “fresh” consideration is required to effect a valid modification of that original contract. There are two ways to ensure that a promise for extra money is enforceable. Either one party does something “more” than was required by the original agreement or that original agreement is discharged by both parties and a new agreement concluded.3 Traditionally, the courts have been unwilling to imply that an original agreement was “torn up” and a new one concluded – this is a conclusion they are willing to reach only where the evidence clearly supports such a finding. Regardless of how artificial these two ways may appear, if the parties wish to alter the price stipulated in the original contract, they should ensure there is fresh consideration for the promise of such additional money.

3. Traditional doctrine of Stilk v Myrick

This aspect of the consideration doctrine originates from the case of Stilk v Myrick.4 Myrick was a captain on a ship who employed Stilk to work on a Baltic Sea voyage. During the voyage two members of the crew deserted and the master promised that the remaining sailors could share the deserters” wages amongst themselves if they sailed the ship back home. Upon arrival at the dock, the master refused to honour that promise and Stilk sued for the sum. His claim failed.

When explaining the grounds upon which the judgment was decided, it must be emphasised that this case was published in two separate law reports, both of which offered different ratios. Nevertheless, Campbell”s report has generally been considered correct, and its ratio accepted as the precedent governing this area of law.5 The main reason it gives for the failure of Stilk”s claim is that the agreement lacked consideration. The sailors were not entitled to the additional payment because they merely did what they were obliged to do by virtue of their original contract. They provided no new consideration for the captain”s promise of extra money.

The other source, the Espinasse report, says that the main reason for the result was public policy. It was undesirable that it should be open to the sailors in the future to exercise improper pressure on their master to increase their wages. This report makes no reference to the fact that lack of consideration would bar the claim, and instead focuses on the need to avoid what would in modern law be referred to as economic duress.6 Economic duress exists when one party illegitimately abuses his or her superior economic power to coerce the other party into agreeing to a particular set of terms.7 A contract entered into under economic duress is voidable and may be set aside by the court.8

In any case, it has always been the first report that was applied. The rule about the existing duty laid by the Campbell report was followed many times afterwards,9 but has always been somewhat controversial. It simply does not seem fair that a party can breach his or her promise and get away with it, even if the other party acted upon that promise in good faith.

There have been some voices criticising this rule. For example, Lord Denning tried to escape it because it can often lead to unfair results. He stated in Ward v Byham10 that “a promise to perform an existing duty,11 or the performance of it, should be regarded as good consideration, because it is a benefit to the person to whom it is given.” The promisor in fact benefited from the situation – he obtained “factual benefit”.12

Nevertheless, most of the judiciary were not willing to come to such radical conclusions. In Ward v Byham the remaining judges expressly refused Lord Denning”s revolutionary proposition. Throughout history, rather than going against the traditional doctrine, courts were often ready to find consideration even where one could say that there was none to be found. Sometimes it is said that courts “invented consideration” to abide by the orthodox doctrine.13

4. Revolution against the old approach: No legal benefit necessary

The controversial case of Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd.14 might be labelled as falling into this category. This decision has dramatically changed the traditional doctrine regarding pre-existing contractual duty and has cast great uncertainty over the future development of consideration in this area.

 

4.1 Williams v Roffey

The Roffey Brothers were builders who contracted with a housing association to refurbish a block of 27 flats. They sub-contracted the carpentry work to Williams for £20,000. Williams got into financial difficulties and it was apparent that he might not be able to complete the work on time. It was mainly because Wiliams had underpriced his contract. The second reason was deficiency in William”s supervision of his workers. Roffey Bros. became worried that they would be liable under a penalty clause in their main contract and promised Williams an additional sum of £10,300. This was to be paid at the rate of £575 per flat on completion. Williams finished eight more flats but only received £1,500. Williams ultimately sued Roffey Bros. for the remaining sum.

The main issue before the Court of Appeals was whether Williams provided consideration for the additional £10,300 promised by Roffey Bros. The court held that the agreement to pay the extra money was enforceable. This came as a great surprise. It defied the traditional rule set out in Stilk v Myrick. What was the consideration provided by Williams? He only did the work that he was bound to do by his original agreement – he only performed a duty already owed to Roffey.

 

4.2 New form of consideration: Practical benefit

In Williams v. Roffey, the court found valid consideration in the practical benefit that Roffey obtained by his agreement with Williams. So far the practical/factual benefit (Denning) has been refused as good consideration. The argument has always been that consideration must be something of value in the eyes of law – something that provides or brings about a legal benefit.

What was this practical benefit? It consisted of a number of factors. The court held that it was the fact that Williams continued his work and did not breach the sub-contract. Therefore, Roffey avoided the trouble of looking for somebody else to complete the work. Furthermore, Roffey avoided the penalty payment for the delay under the main contract. Also, by directing the claimant to complete one flat at a time, the defendant was able to organize their work with other subcontractors in a more efficient manner. It is clear that the logic of “factual benefit” earlier argued by Lord Denning was applied here. Even though there was no legal benefit to Roffey, the contractual modification, in fact, benefited Roffey.

It is questionable whether this reasoning about “practical benefits” is persuasive enough to disregard the need for a legal benefit and change this rule in such a dramatic way. When looking at each of the “practical benefits”, one realizes that they do not consist of anything additional. Roffey would have received all of these benefits under the original contract, even if it were not modified. In fact, all of these new “advantages” were the very reason why they concluded the original contract. Williams was hired as the subcontractor to do the work. Therefore, the main purpose here was not to look for anyone else to do the job. Similarly, the fact that Roffey did not have to pay the penalty because the plaintiff continued the work was the very reason that a subcontractor would have been hired initially. The question is: how can this count as a fresh consideration? Was this not yet another “invented consideration” by the courts?

 

4.3 Practical benefit justified by commercial reality

On the other hand, it can be argued that this pragmatic decision finally concedes what can be called “commercial reality”. After all, it is a common practice in the building industry for the main contractor to increase sub-contractors” payments if the parties see that the price is too low. As the counsel for the plaintiff argued, “It would be unfortunate if English law deprived an acceptable commercial practice, which both parties regard as beneficial, of legal effect.” Thus, the court should look at the situation as it stands and acknowledge what in fact is beneficial for the parties, as opposed to seeking a theoretical “legal benefit”. The preference should be given to what the actual intention of the parties was when renegotiating the contract, so that their intended agreement is given effect. Would it not be unfair to negate their clear arrangement that was entered into voluntarily? Russel LJ said: “Consideration there must be but courts should be more ready to find its existence as to reflect the intention of the parties.”

Obviously, there are two competing principles to be weighed regarding the doctrine of consideration. It can be said that modifications are in the public interest and both parties should be encouraged to bargain their way out of an unanticipated difficulty. On the other hand, it is also desirable to hold parties to the contractual terms of their bargain.15 Clearly, there are pros and cons to each of the two conflicting interests.

 

5. Potential escape from a contract as a value?

Another issue should be contemplated in this area. It was said that Williams suffered a detriment by continuing the work and not breaching the contract. His counsel argued “he (Williams) might have been better off by breaking the contract, getting higher paid work elsewhere and paying such damages as the contractor can recover against him”.16 Can this constitute good consideration? Can this be anything of value in the eyes of law? This proposition seems to undermine the sanctity of contracts. It is an old principle of law that people should be held to their bargains – Pacta sunt servanda. Therefore, the legal practice should promote this principle and not acknowledge that a threatened breach of contract is a viable basis for finding consideration. Such reasoning does not seem correct as a part of legal practice.

Threatening with breach of contract to increase the agreed price is indeed walking on thin ice. As mentioned above, agreements that are achieved by illegitimate pressure exercised by the party with greater economic power can be set aside on the grounds of economic duress.17 It was very important that in Williams v Roffey duress was not established on the facts of the case. The main reason that the judgment was given for Williams was almost certainly because duress was not involved. Roffey called for the meeting because it was obvious that the work would not be finished as planned. Williams did not explicitly threaten with breach of contract.

 

6. Consequences of the new approach to consideration

Undoubtedly, Williams v Roffey significantly widened the scope of the doctrine of consideration. Promises to perform existing duties can now be good consideration when they lead to practical benefit. As the doctrine of duress is a relatively new concept (first acknowledged in 1976), in the past, courts used consideration in situations that would nowadays be judged in terms of duress. In situations like those in Stilk v Myrick, the judge could not avail himself of economic duress and instead used lack of consideration as the reason for his judgment. Thus, a case like Stilk would be decided differently today. Most likely, it would be brought as a duress case and not necessarily fail for lack of consideration. It could be stated that the Court of Appeals followed the reasoning from the Espinasse report.18

 

6.1 Reconciliation of Stilk v Myrick and Williams v Roffey

It would seem that Williams v Roffey overruled Stilk v Myrick, but the court emphasized that Stilk still remains good law and distinguished Williams v Roffey. Glidwell LJ said that Williams v Roffey does not contravene the principles from Stilk, but that it “refines and limits” the application of them. However, it is not wholly clear from the judgment on what basis the court arrived at this conclusion. The judges argued that the rigid approach to consideration in Stilk was only a product of the special conditions of the seafare in the 18th century, and that it was too harsh to exist without changes in the modern day. However, the two cases are very similar. Myrick also obtained practical benefit because the sailors continued performance of their contract. Furthermore, Williams v Roffey was later applied in an employment case19 where it was held that when an employee”s wage is increased, sufficient consideration for the increase is the fact that the employee continues his or her work and does not try to bargain for more money.20 Is this not exactly the same situation as in Stilk?

Even if the court was so resolute that Stilk has not been overruled, it seems difficult to defend this idea for much longer. The conclusion could be drawn that the only principle that has survived the attack of Williams v Roffey is that consideration is still required when modifying a contract, while Stilk has been overruled as to what counts as fresh consideration.21

6.2 Application in day-to-day business

It is without a doubt that “practical benefit” is now a recognized category that can be used in practice to establish consideration. Lawyers arguing enforcement of promises for extra payment when the consideration is of doubtful value should avail themselves of “practical benefit” and argue that effect should be given to “commercial reality.” Furthermore, lawyers should argue that it is in the interest of the parties to reach a viable solution that is acceptable to everyone. It is, after all, in the public interest to bargain one”s way out of a stalemate rather than end up in a costly litigation process.

On the other hand, it has become more difficult for the opposing party to attack such contractual modifications because it is no longer so simple to plead lack of consideration where some sort of benefit can be found. It should be argued that there is no legal or practical benefit, and therefore no consideration. The security of contracts should be emphasized – people should get what they bargain for and not be pushed to pay more if difficulties arise. Any sign of duress makes such modification unenforceable. Therefore, one should always look at the process of renegotiation. Simply, was there any sign of improper pressure from the party who was in the stronger contractual position? If so, economic duress should be pleaded as a vitiating factor to the promise.

Williams v Roffey has since been applied in two cases,22 both dealing with renegotiation of commercial contracts. In each case it was held that consideration lay in the “practical benefit” that one party obtained because the other party did not breach the contract and continued its performance.23

 

7. Conclusion: What is the future of consideration?

A new liberal approach has been set. Courts are now more willing to find consideration just to give effect to what they perceive as the actual intent of the parties. This tolerant attitude is counter-balanced by the use of duress as the tool to limit bargains that have been achieved by improper means. The issue is whether this situation is wholly satisfactory. Courts have not been clear enough about the future application of this new approach, and it is evident that the doctrine of consideration in this area has been plunged into confusion.

These reflections might lead to a more revolutionary interpretation of Williams v Roffey. Is there really a need for consideration when varying a contract? American law, for example, does not require it.24 Maybe it is finally time to stop being too afraid of changes and to move ahead. After all, is this not the real unexpressed meaning of Williams v Roffey? It seems that law would become more efficient without the formalistic burden of consideration when modifying a contract.

Reflections about contractual modifications might logically lead us even further. Is consideration necessary at all? It appears that consideration as a principle is still adhered to, but this effort has become somewhat forced. The civil law system can do well without consideration. There exists an increasing hostility towards the old doctrine. It has become more of a technical obstacle than a useful and essential tool. Maybe the modern law should finally get rid of this ancient principle and replace it with more effective doctrines.

Were the judges too afraid to explicitly admit that Williams v Roffey might be the beginning of the end of consideration?

Tereza Šimanovská is a second-year law student at the Faculty of Law, Charles University in Prague. She has spent one year in London, where she studied at the Faculty of Law at the University of Westminster.

 

 

 

Bibliography


Atiyah P S, Essays on Contract, 1st Edition, Reprinted (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2001)


Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005)


McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005)


Noble M, For Your Consideration, November 8 1991, New Law Journal, Butterworth &Co (Publishers) Ltd


Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005)


Treitel G, Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2002)

 

 

...................

1 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 85

2 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp147

3 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 96

4 Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Camp 317 and 6 Esp 129

5 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 95

6 Ibid

7 Ibid pp 358

8 Nevertheless, there is no evidence that the sailors in Stilk v Myrick actually used any pressure to get the extra money. On the contract, it was Myrick himself who promised the increase of wages because he needed to get the ship home. Thus, whilst no actual duress was proved in this, the decision aimed to pre-emptively prevent such situations occurring in the future.

9 For example Atlas Express v Kafco [1989] QB 833

10 Ward v Byham [1956] 1 WLR 496

11 However, here Lord Denning was concerned with a pre-existing duty deriving from public law, not a duty owed under a contract.

12 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp 145

13 Prof Treitel as cited in McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 86

14 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

15 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 99

16 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1

17 However, a distinction should be made between threats of breach of contract that amount to economic duress and behaviour that only amounts to acceptable commercial pressure. It should be highlighted that at the moment the law is not very clear about where the exact borderline lays. It seems that not all threats of breach of contract are automatically illegal.

18 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 100

19 Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications [1993] IRLR 383

20 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

21 Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law, 1st Edition (US: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005) pp153

22 Anangel Atlas Compania Naviera SA v Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co Ltd (no 2) [1990] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 526; Simon Container Machinery Ltd v Emba Machinery AB [1998] 2 Lloyd”s Rep 429

23 Stone R, The Modern Law of Contract, 6th Edition (UK: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2005) pp 92

24 McKendrick E, Contract Law, 6th Edition (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005) pp 102.

 
< Předch.   Další >